It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Queen to make historic UN address and appeal for 'world peace'

page: 5
22
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:58 AM
link   
I have to say that half of the people posting here seem like idiots. Are you really that blind or upset?

Queen (famous icon globally known, despite who is pulling the strings) + her biggest speech ever (importance) + at the UN (to whole world) + about world peace (unity, peace, love) = UFO/ET Disclosure to soon follow.

You have to ask:
Why now? Why now with all the things happening? Why not a year ago? Why not after 9/11 or some other day? What will the implications be? Our space brothers asked us to put away evil and hate, to learn to love, put aside nuclear weapons, live in peace. All this is coming full circle slowly, but surely. Just look around you. 10 years ago people would laugh about aliens, now they are trying to find them as soon as possible...Phobos, exoplanets, conferences, ESA, NASA, Mars, Titan, etc.

This speech will be seen by hundreds of millions of people around the world. It will be on every news station, LIVE! This speech will be something more important than Obama talking on FOX News about the US or whatever.

Everyone knows who's the Queen, no matter if they like her or not, they know her and that's what counts, not how old she is or whatnot!

I'm sure other countries will respond to her call in one way or another. The fact is, Disclosure can happen in this timeframe and will happen within 2013. It might even happen this year depending on how things turn out. But you have to put the puzzle together to understand what this speech means. It's like the oil spill, but the exact opposite. Just listen to what she has to say if you care and let's see when we will meet our space family.


[edit on 28/6/10 by Cybernet]




posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 07:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 



Nice to see someone else with an open mind.


At 84 year old, I can't see her travelling all that way to deliver a speech just because she's told to.

I have noticed recently at a lot of her public appearances that she seems to be getting sick and tired of all the carry on going on in the world.

She, IMO, is trying to use whatever influence she has left to do some good.


[edit on 28/6/10 by woogleuk]



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 07:27 AM
link   
If she has something sensational and world changing, if she gives up her millions for the cause of world peace, if she suggests that the troops should return from the warzone or....even if she has some positive words to say in relation to peace..something practical and not hypocritical...I, for one will listen, until I see this Ill read between the lines..and remauin jaded and cynical!! Seriously what use is this women that would change the course of any conflict and deliver us peace?? Who's listening to her?



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 07:40 AM
link   
reply to post by grantbeed
 


Her appeal isn't very urgent it seems...nothing that important to say worth giving up the summer vacation.

At least she's keeping it real in all her fakeness.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 07:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Anam Gra
 


I am a firm believer in wealth re-distribution, I am curious why you single The Queen out?

And if she is so useless and un-influential why are you so passionate in your dislike and disdain for her?



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   
Why is it that I get the feeling that this is in reality not a message of peace but a message to the rest of the PTB to start something yet to be determined. Just a gut feeling. It will be interesting to see what key words she uses and hand motions. It just does not sit right with me.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 08:40 AM
link   
Righty O here we go. First for your consideration is the Oath of Allegiance. This oath is sworn by every serving member of HM Forces.


" I ....insert name..........Swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and Successors and that I will as in my duty bound honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors in Person, Crown and Dignity against all enemies and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors and of the Generals and Officers set over me."

Whenever you see a crown on an official emblem of any office in the United Kingdom or Commonwealth you can be assured she has control and final say in any matters concerning that office. She is the largest landowner in the world, and true wealth and power comes from land. In fact every pleb who considers they have bought and paid for land in any of Her Colonies should take a look at their deeds, you will find you are listed as Tenant, then go look up the definition of the word Tenant.

She is also the major shareholder in the Bank of England, the benchmark institution of Central Banking. She has major shares in the arms production industry throughout the Commonwealth, with a particular interest in landmines. In fact if you really want to know why Diana was snuffed do some research into her campaigning against landmines in the build up to that fateful night in Paris. Imagine what the Don of a Mafia family would do to an embarrassing wife of a member of the Mob who threatened one of their earners and you should start to see the truth.

On a personal note she is a vile, vindictive, ruthless and tight fisted woman, who pays her staff peanuts and keeps everything she is given as gifts. In fact she never throws out any of her clothing, imagine how much money could be created for charity by the auction of her unwanted items, why I bet there's a few members here would pay a pretty penny for her granny pants. She has as much interest in peace as McDonalds has in vegetarianism.

The conclusion is thus, if you want to make War you better be screaming Peace, you want a War Hawk you better give them the Noble prize, you want your Subjects to allow you to send their sons to murder little black people and come home scarred, maimed, mentally unstable or in a nice black bag, you better get your wrinkly arse to the UN and chuck out some rhetoric.


Gentlemen, The Queen...



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:07 AM
link   
reply to post by grantbeed
 


You do realise that it is the UK government that has sent the troops into Afgan and Iraq, not the Queen or the Royal family, who have very little to no power or say in the running of the country and certainly cannot control where the troops are deployed.

The Queen is a figurehead. The Prime Minister runs the country as leader of the ruling political party.

So, where exactly is the hypocracy? The Queen didn't order the troops in, so why shouldn't she appeal for peace?



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:20 AM
link   
reply to post by nik1halo
 


Please read my post previous to your last. You will see that the British Military is the sole property of Her Majesty and should the British Government wish to use it they would absolutely need Her permission.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by SOXMIS

Please read my post previous to your last. You will see that the British Military is the sole property of Her Majesty and should the British Government wish to use it they would absolutely need Her permission.


The catch is that she would not be allowed, in practice, to refuse permission.
You're confusing theory with reality.
The great mystery of the British constitution is that the Queen has absolute power, as long as she doesn't try using it.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:28 AM
link   
reply to post by grantbeed
 


It infuriates me when people dont understand the reasons why we are in Afghanistan, you do realise if we didn't head over there then many more terrorist attacks would of occured in the U.K right? Withdrawing the troops without the job being finished would trivialise the entire effort.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:32 AM
link   
I'm disapointed in the way people on ATS have turned this place into one mass bridge for all the trolls to live under!!!

This is a thread talking about the Queen making a speech at the UN, all thats come out so far is that you're all haters with not much to say on the subject at hand, like most threads on ATS these days, just people shouting utter rubbish and turning ATS into some kind of childish bitching match.

Are any of you actually intrested in what she might have to say!!

[edit on 28-6-2010 by Kurokage]



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by DISRAELI
 


I'm sorry but you are confusing theory with reality. The Oath of Allegiance is a legal requirement so that you may be tried for treason, desertion, refusal to obey orders etc. I see no mention of the British Government in there. I have had many conversations with former comrades with regards to this Oath, including a high ranking officer in the SIB of the military police, and while it may appear to the public the Queen has no power the truth is far more telling. Nice try though.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Really hypocritical for one of the NWO head honchos to call for World Peace! I think the Peace they want is for the people to quit struggling and go peaceably to destruction.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:36 AM
link   
reply to post by SOXMIS
 


That is nothing more than pomp and circumstance. The whole country is founded on it. It's the remnants of a long dead empire and it may be true that the Queen does own the majority of the land, but mostly in writing only. The law of the land protects the rights of the individual. I own my home. It cannot be taken off me without full reimbursement, if I wish to leave it to my daughter after my death, then that is what will happen.

There are so many ancient parts of the British law that are still law, but simply don't apply in the modern world. Do you really think the Lord of the Manor still drives his his sheep through the town square to market? No, but he's got the right to by law, although I'm pretty sure if he tried, he would be arrested for obstructing the traffic.

The Queen is mostly impotent in the general running of the country. Parliament, the ruling party and the Prime Minister run the UK, officially. The UK may be a Monarchy, but it is first and foremost a Democracy and has survived for hundrends of years as such.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by DISRAELI

Originally posted by SOXMIS

Please read my post previous to your last. You will see that the British Military is the sole property of Her Majesty and should the British Government wish to use it they would absolutely need Her permission.


The catch is that she would not be allowed, in practice, to refuse permission.
You're confusing theory with reality.
The great mystery of the British constitution is that the Queen has absolute power, as long as she doesn't try using it.


That's true, if she did try to flex har Royal muscles, she'd be kicked off the throne faster than a fart in a wind tunnel!



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:39 AM
link   
reply to post by woodwytch
 


Try taking a breath there friend!!

If you re-read my post you will notice that I'm talking about the the whole worlds goverments here not just our little country, and that people around the world are starting to get fed up with not being heard.

Whats done is done, I do not have a time machine to go back and change British history, thats why I stated that atleast something good came out of it's past like the commonwealth.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by nik1halo
reply to post by SOXMIS
 


That is nothing more than pomp and circumstance. The whole country is founded on it. It's the remnants of a long dead empire and it may be true that the Queen does own the majority of the land, but mostly in writing only. The law of the land protects the rights of the individual. I own my home. It cannot be taken off me without full reimbursement, if I wish to leave it to my daughter after my death, then that is what will happen.

There are so many ancient parts of the British law that are still law, but simply don't apply in the modern world. Do you really think the Lord of the Manor still drives his his sheep through the town square to market? No, but he's got the right to by law, although I'm pretty sure if he tried, he would be arrested for obstructing the traffic.

The Queen is mostly impotent in the general running of the country. Parliament, the ruling party and the Prime Minister run the UK, officially. The UK may be a Monarchy, but it is first and foremost a Democracy and has survived for hundrends of years as such.


Im sorry but you lost me at ..in writing only. The idea that the Government rules the country is absurd. All they do is manage the country and give serfs the illusion of choice and say in how it is managed. Democracy is just a word, to understand it's meaning I suggest you go to the source and read Plato's Republic. You will see it was never meant to be for the people, only to keep them docile, ignorant and happy.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Cant we all just get along?... NO!

IMO the world is so messed up it is to late for world peace without one last big war to get everyone singing to the same tune



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 09:58 AM
link   
reply to post by SOXMIS
 


So what do you really think would happen if the queen suddenly decided that she wasn't going to comply with parliament anymore? She would be removed from the throne! We kicked the Royals out of the country once before. It is the power of the English Royal Family that is the illusion. They were ALLOWED to return to the throne in order to overthrow the despot Cromwell and his vile idiot son.

Just because something is written on a piece of paper somewhere doesn't mean that that writing can magically affect reality. On paper, the Queen owns vast swathes of the English Countryside, but the reality is that if my house is on some of that land, then I am still the one occupying it and the Queen herself is powerless to remove me from it on a whim. The government however is a different matter altogether...



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join