It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You said that if it was a natural collapse, it should lean in the direction of the damage. It leaned slightly in the direction of slight damage it received from 1's collapse. Proving your thought to be correct. Now you're backpedaling. Hypocrite.
They cannot explain vaporization of the steel...
Originally posted by richierich
We KNOW that we have a massive amount of hard evidence, and that any fair and honest investigation would lead to only ONE conclusion:
The Official Story is an insult to the informed mind. Period.
Why waste time trying to educate those who do not want to be educated? The Official Story cultists cannot and never will answer the hard questions. They cannot, so all they do is try and distract and confuse the casual reader to make it hard to believe the truth.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Doctor Smith
Do you really believe that a 47 story building has enough structural integrity to "fall over like a domino" of are you basing this opinion on Hollywood disaster movies?
The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Give it up,
WW. Jones not only has an agenda
he is completely out of his depth when it comes to analytical chemistry. The science in the paper is so bad he had to pay to get it published and the only peer review it received was the Bentham owner peering into the envelope to review the check.
Jones couldn't find thermite if it was burning in his back pocket.