Originally posted by 2009

Originally posted by rustiswordz
I agree with the NSA principal. there are too many people in this world and Africa/Sth America and Middle east nations have no useful presence in the world except to drain valuable resoursed the west could use.

They are lost causes, the lame dogs of the world. Time to take the lame dogs out to the farmers barn with a shotgun im afraid.

wow...your post shows your total lack of humanity.... i agree that there are too many people in the world, but kill em all is just not the answer. rustiswordz, try to put yourself in their situation, their life. it's easy to judge people from our perspective, but it's time to shift our understanding to theirs.

if we have to resort to massive genocide in order to let the bad guys live, i will NOT take place in it

I apologise if my bluntness has offended people but i stand by my comments.

The wests decades long attempts at trying to stop war in palestine/middle east, disease and famine in africa, drugs in south america has failed EVERYTIME.

And now with the worlds population ever increasing rapidly and resourses dwindling any further attempts to remedy these situations will involve the utter waste of resourses that we need here in the west. A futile exersise wich will bring us down to their level. Fact is lthe west has had its dark ages, its fudal times. Most of these poor places are still 500/600 years behind the west mentally, and we have given these wreches AK47's and Tanks instead of spears and bows/arrows. God forbit if they ever get nukes, because they arnt mentally stable enough not to use them first.

It boils down to survival of the fittest, them or us. And i dont want it to be us. No way.

i agree that the world's population is way out of control...
the way to slow and then reverse the population is to make it pointless to have more than 2 children (this idea would only work in the west)
child benefits would should only be paid to first 2 children, the second child only gets half the finacial support that the first child gets.
This a bloodless and humain way to reduce the western population
the middle east is more difficult as child support doesn't exist,

population movement should also be limited as this would stop countries such as Britain becoming over populated on such a small island

if this post is offensive to anyone i'm sorry, i'm trying to be practical
'you sometimes have to be cruel to be kind'

[edit on 26-6-2004 by UK Wizard]

Please note thae the U.S. Government removed the Native American from our shores with little or no hesitation. It would also be done to other area's of the world with no feeling of regret. Only on a more "low Key" level. Consider the Life Boat Syndrome...

Almost every problem affecting the world today can be attributed in one way or another to human overpopulation.

It's all right saying it will stabilise by 2050, but it's already far too high.

The introduction of a lethal virus, to decimate, but not entirely destroy, humankind is a logical solution. But I think we need to worry far more about 'Mother Nature' producing the virus, rather than some mythical NWO group. AIDS and SARS may just be dry runs for the real thing....

Originally posted by rustiswordz
God forbit if they ever get nukes, because they arnt mentally stable enough not to use them first.

It boils down to survival of the fittest, them or us. And i dont want it to be us. No way.

by 'us', do you mean people who agree with you? humans? humans that are not 'challenged' in some way? north americans? americans? just whites?
you know, nukes don't just blow stuff up, they also leave a legacy of infertility. when you say 'survival'. are you talking in terms of years or thousands of years? you should go visit chernobyl, sometime. that is the best painting of a post nuclear future we have. NOBODY is mentally stable enough to use them first.

there ARE too many people in the world. i wanted to eat six hamburgers yesterday, and i only got four. what happened to the rest????
someone ELSE ate them! hungry people who had the nerve to try and enjoy life. stupid barbarians. so, i killed them, like any civilised person would have. first i had to torture them so they would admit that they were guilty of, ....ummmm, ....guilty of......, ummmmmm, .....of living?

p.s. if i had the unmitigated gall to think i should be making GOD'S decisions for it, YOU would be on my expendable list. why? inability to see the big picture, violent mindset, and therefore, a danger to the continued healthy existence of the human race.

Thats why in ther lottery of life im in the millionaires row living in a comfortable western society and i dont want to give it up.

Depopulation is clearly an agenda of the Rockefeller - IG Farben industrial-pharmaceutical cartel. Their plans fit nicely with those of the Council on Foreign Relations, of which almost anyone of any status in economics and/or politics finds membership. Coincidence? I think not.

Eugenics has been around since the early years of the last century and foreign policy is directly influenced by this ideology.

Sterility, vaccinations, fabricated diseases and ailments, droughts, famine, wars.....they all play a part.

The 'world' cannot sustain the economic consumption of the first world and by circumstance, the majority of the resources WE need are found in the third world.

Look into the 'Georgia Guidestones'
A 'mini-stonehenge located in Georgia with a number of inscriptions. Nobody knows, or is willing to say, who financed or initiated this project but I do find it curiously coincidental that the very first line inscribed on these stones states "...Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature..."

Interesting.

This is probably the most important topic on the board - not because of the problem, but because the depopulating main event is very near.

marg6043 has a good grasp of what's going on, but NetChicken demonstrates once again just how far behind the curve he is living.

One thing should be clear, though. There is no population problem, per se. Less than an hour's drive from almost any U.S. city and you are looking at open land, and the Fed has locked up more land than can be imagined. There is certainly overcrowding in a few cities, but this is because of social structure. In other countries tales of famine, etc., can almost all be traced back to local government programs, or government corruption in general.

To understand the overpopulation concept, you must first recognize that it is probably our oldest running PR campaign - having begun as soon as the demographic problems created by the Baby Boomers were recognized. They were fine, of course, as long as they were producing and paying into the system. All the pressure was directed at preventing them from creating baby baby boomers to follow in their footsteps. Unfortunately, this worked too well, especially with Vietnam to thin the ranks of their kids. Now a demographic problem has turned into an economic nightmare.

The baby boomers are about to retire and in the U.S. alone will represent a minimum drain of thirty billion dollars a month on Federal programs and private pension and insurance funds. They didn't have enough kids to support them in a system based on stealing from your grandchildren to finance your retirement. Having paid in to the system all their lives, their fate is to be killed off before they can reverse the flow. Like everything else, it's all about MONEY.

Their replacements, young families with good work ethic and healthy birth rate are already in place, about twenty million having been imported from Mexico. Watching for clues, I believe the great die-off is scheduled to begin in late December. This will be global, for sure, and result in a 2.5 to 5% death rate in most countries. However the countries which adopted socialism, as demonstrated by social security and medicare-type programs, have been setting up their populations for a much bigger hit, 7.5 to 10% or more, by spraying them with immune-suppressing chemicals for almost six years.