It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Lets instead take a mentally ill persons word for it that humans came about as a matter of coincidence and that a humans Consciousness does not .
Trying to discredit a scientist by calling him mentally ill? Not only does that show disrepect to the scientists.. but it also disrepects people with mental illnesses.
Just because someone is depressed or suicidal does not mean they are deluded or wrong.. and it certainly does not invalidate their previous scientific accomplishments.
Bad form.
[edit on 26-6-2010 by riley]
Originally posted by ChrisBenoit
I'd still much rather believe a sick man of science than a delusional man of religion.
Science has never started wars in the name of theories.
You don't hear about physics students being molested by their professors in the news.
You don't hear about biology majors blowing themselves up in a crowded city center in the name of evolution.
Stupid science- why would anyone want to believe in substantiated facts.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The Universe is pure perfection, beautiful and wonderful to those who understand it and its rules and also the karmic purpose of incarnating onto these training-grounds of choice called Earth.
the primate family of mammals (eg chimpanzees, gorillas etc) all have 48 chromosomes, with the only exception being humans who have 46. However, human beings share 98% of the 20,000 + genes with the rest of the primate family.
However, this is not to say that 98% of the total 3 Billion bases of DNA of human beings is the same as the total 3 Billion bases of other primates. The “junk DNA” of human beings, which constitutes the vast majority of DNA is substantially different in many parts to primates.
What is without question is that human beings are different to other primates in many respects, the most striking being the statistically unique number of extinction level anomalies found in humans and no other species to have ever existed on planet Earth!
These include:
+ The oversize head of new born babies relative to the birth canal of female humans- a genetic anomaly that has been present since the origin of the species;
+ The ability to choke on food- given the human mouth does not allow a person to breath and swallow at the same time- a genetic anomaly that has been present since the origin of the species;
+ The absence of a bone within the male human penis which means copulation requires a significantly longer period of time that a male and female are vulnerable to attack than any other known species- a genetic anomaly that has been present since the origin of the species;
+ The absence of significant hair on the human body which means humans require clothing to avoid hypothermia and dehydration in the open and increased risk of viral/bacteria attack - a genetic anomaly that has been present since the origin of the species;
+ The extremely poor repair qualities of human skin, worse than any known mammal meaning even a relatively small event for other species with strong, resistant skin can prove fatal to humans a genetic anomaly that has been present since the origin of the species.
Any one of these genetic anomolies should have been enough to create such a disadvantage to the human species to render it extinct. But excluding any notion of civilization, the existence of no less than five such genetic anomolies in one species means the human race should simply not exist- for it defies the laws of evolution to think a species could survive "natural selection" and at the same time have so many defects promoting its extinction.
evilone-org
Could any sane person assert that as a fact? So for me, just recently learning that Darwin had severe issues, was a relief.
Originally posted by Daniem
It's usually not the teacher that's considered the mentally challenged...
So what you're realy saying is that everyone who believes in Darwins idea about evolution are insane (?)
You have successfully offended those who believe in evolution. What a dissapointing day it is when mods of ats can make such hateful threads.
The really interesting question is if jesus was mentally ill, would that make his message of peace and love any less valid?
Originally posted by Deuteronomy 23:13
I don't believe in evolution for the following reason. Evolution implies that a chicken can lay an egg and a duck will be born from it.
Originally posted by Prosecutor
Actually it sheds light on a man who was NOT a scientist
and how it disrespects the mentally ill is anyone's guess. What should he have done? Used a more sugar coated and politically correct term for the word?
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Skyfloating
All other theories are simply that, theories with no proof whatsover, and so leaps of faith are required if anyone is to place any belief in them.
A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
Example: It is known that on June 30, 1908 in Tunguska, Siberia, there was an explosion equivalent to the detonation of about 15 million tons of TNT. Many hypotheses have been proposed for what caused the explosion. It is theorized that the explosion was caused by a natural extraterrestrial phenomenon, and was not caused by man. Is this theory a fact? No. The event is a recorded fact. Is this this theory generally accepted to be true, based on evidence to-date? Yes. Can this theory be shown to be false and be discarded? Yes.
Originally posted by plutoxgirl
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The Universe is pure perfection, beautiful and wonderful to those who understand it and its rules and also the karmic purpose of incarnating onto these training-grounds of choice called Earth.
Very well said. I agree completely.
And starred and flagged the thread.
Darwin?? seriously people still belive in that?.....pfff.
Originally posted by Annee
I was very religious the first half of my life. But - then it dawned on me - I was assimilated.
I did not choose to believe in a god.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Just as a matter of interest in pointing out the difference between materialists/atheists and spiritualists:
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
There are MANY who are Spiritual Atheists, lacking a belief in a deity, but believing in a spiritual realm of some sort.