It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Yeah ok, firstly it's Stephen Hawking, not Hawkins.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Secondly the idea he abuses his condition is ridiculous, how exactly does he do that, he's unable to move and just spends his time doing talks.
Not to mention how utterly heartless this comment was.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Moreover, the ancient religions are often an attempt to describe evolution, (man being made from dust sparked to life by god, primordial soup being sparked to life by lightning) and people on both sides of the fence are too dogmatic to realize there is no conflict here, people.
Most religious traditions are chock full of "how to play the game of natural selection as an individual or group" style rules. Its unfortunate the unthinking on both sides cannot see that.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
You obviously haven't read Darwins book because modern science has discounted numerous parts of it. Darwins basic premise was correct, that species accumulate small changes and eventually become so different from their ancestors they can be considered a seperate species.
Modern science has found other parts of Darwins book to be incorrect, they didn't simply build on his theory, they tested it thoroughly. The fact we share very similar genetic material with our closest relatives is further proof of Darwins theory, proof he coudln't even conceive of at the time.
Originally posted by thomas_
And please don't twist things around to say that mocking his condition because I'm not by any means. I just can't say that I feel sorry for him while there are far way more people in this world that share his exact same condition or worst and yet don't manage to live like him nor can afford and enjoy his gizmos and health care.
Originally posted by EYEofSAURON
Wow, that is pretty hateful thing to say about someone! A moron? Gee you must be a christian!
Originally posted by thomas_
And please I don't need to present proofs to disprove a THEORY, theories are no facts. Theories are constructions made over a pre-existent knowledge base that might be correct or not. If you want to know what I consider holes in the human evolution theory a quick google search should be sufficient and it's not up to me to do that for you.
Originally posted by thomas_
You're free to question and accept whatever you want, and I don't want to change the way you think.
But am I entitle to disagree with what science says or not?
Originally posted by thomas_
Or I'm simply obligated to accept theories as facts just because someone said so and replace my own judgement, knowledge, logic and way of thinking for theirs?
Originally posted by thomas_
It certainly would make things easier but I don't like to be economical when it comes to thinking.
Originally posted by thomas_
I know that if was up to you most people would leave the thinking part to others and simply live by other's ideas and ideals. I'm sorry but that doesn't and never worked for me.
Originally posted by Prosecutor
Originally posted by lifecitizen
Mentally ill or not, I will still believe in Darwins theory of evolution as opposed to a invisible magic sky fairy that is coming back to save us.
Intelligent people can't suffer from neurosis? is it limited to dumb people?
I never heard of a religion with an invisible sky fairyCan you elaborate on that more, or would that press the issue getting you to be more specific about what your real intention to insult a group of people for their beliefs?
Don't sugar coat it, take a real stand, have some guts man. Don't hide behind cutsey sarcasm and terminology you had to borrow from so called "free thinkers" and just call everyone who isn't an atheist "stupid". does that about sum YOU up. Soon atheists will kill free speech and that "free thought" they can't seem to find unless they read it from another religion hating website, will evolve into the belief police ignoring their own imbecilic beliefs evolution being one of them
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Moreover, the ancient religions are often an attempt to describe evolution, (man being made from dust sparked to life by god, primordial soup being sparked to life by lightning) and people on both sides of the fence are too dogmatic to realize there is no conflict here, people.
However, on a cautionary note, I do fear that in this age of specialism, we are in danger of losing touch with the connectivity of all things. The dissension between the 'spiritual' and the 'scientific' is just one example of this, I believe.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Hopefully if an argument begins for ending the war between the spiritual and secular in earnest, perhaps we can return to that accelerated path for knowing truths, this time with the technology to make it useful to us in material ways.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Err yes actually it is up to you, if you make a claim that something is wrong then it is up to you, making the positive claim to provide evidence for that opinion if you wish others to accept it. To me this seems like you are trying to squirm your way out of it.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Furthermore theories are collections of facts, a framework in which facts fit and support one another. The fact you don't even understand that suggests you have no knowledge of what theory means within a scientific context and therefore your opinion means very little.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Entitled? Absolutely you are. I am also entitled to say that you are absolutely wrong and nearly every scientist out there also says you're wrong. Basically you are bashing your head off of a wall of reality and refusing to admit the wall is there. If you want to live like that then fine but it's people like you who thought the Earth was the centre of the universe and refused to accept the evidence to the contrary and this will hold civilization back.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Again you are not obliged but the logical thing when presented with evidence is to accept it, going against this is not logical.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Actually it is far more difficult to accept new evidence than it is to carry on believing what you do in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Nope that's not what i believe. Everyone should consider the facts and they are entitled to carry on believing whatever they wish. However when it comes to scientific advance and what kids are taught in schools then i say leave it to the people who have spent a long time studying the evidence and formulating theories to explain it.
Still the point of this thread, as you yourself made clear was to discuss Darwin so lets get back to it shall we.
Originally posted by thomas_
Sorry my friend but theories are theories no matter their context, otherwise they would be facts and explain things fully. Even if composed by collection of facts they don't have enough of those facts to become a FACT otherwise they wouldn't be THEORIES period.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by thomas_
Sorry my friend but theories are theories no matter their context, otherwise they would be facts and explain things fully. Even if composed by collection of facts they don't have enough of those facts to become a FACT otherwise they wouldn't be THEORIES period.
I just won't bother with you further as you are unable to understand the difference between theory in the usage of the common individual and the use of the word in a scientific context. In science a theory is given a higher level of respect than a simple fact because a theory takes a load of facts and puts them together into a cohesive framework. The theory is then a fact as it is made of facts. You do understand that the idea of critical mass is a theory yes? Yet we have used that theory to set off nuclear bombs, but it's still a theory.
If you can't comprehend this simple fact then it can be accepted you are simply ignorant of science and therefore your opinion can be ignored.
Originally posted by thomas_
You can't try as much and as hard as you can, but there are enough inconsistencies in the human evolution theory for any intelligent person to question. In the very same way that there is enough holes and inconsistencies in any religious books for one to question it or not accept it.