Just being NEAR the G20 Summit Zone can get you ARRESTED!, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 08:17 AM by acrux
reply to post by bestideayet

The province has secretly passed an unprecedented regulation that empowers police to arrest anyone near the G20 security zone who refuses to identify themselves or agree to a police search.

What distance do they regard as near.


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 08:48 AM by tribewilder
reply to post by acrux



Under the new regulations, anyone who comes within five metres of the security area is obliged to give police their name and state the purpose of their visit on request. Anyone who fails to provide identification or explain why they are near the security zone can be searched and arrested.


source


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 09:00 AM by acrux
reply to post by tribewilder

Under the new regulations, anyone who comes within five metres of the security area is obliged to give police their name and state the purpose of their visit on request. Anyone who fails to provide identification or explain why they are near the security zone can be searched and arrested.


Don't get me wrong, I depise authority too, but to stay outside the 5 metres wouldn't be that hard & still protest about these "G20 shower of bastards", would it?


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 10:01 AM by Venetian
Just read this on the Toronto Star blog section:

06/26/2010 Live blog: Saturday, June 26 10:35 a.m.

Toronto

CP24 reports car near Sherbourne and Gerrard pulled over, police find weapons cache: Nail gun, shovels, axe, bullet proof vest, gas mask. Driver of car is young man from Saskatoon who said he was in Toronto to do his job, which is to protest the new world order.


Source:
Toronto Star

Have to say, it's people like the nutcase described above who is only feeding the mainstream media to classify truthers as terrorist threats. The truth/disclosure movement should be exercised peacefully to get any kind of positive coverage in the news, in my opinion. Having said that, I have noticed that the Canadian media are pretty much mocking the protests instead of being impartial. I have yet to see anything mentioned on the G8 or G20 on US news outlets - they seem to be focusing on Petraeus and other stories more.

On a side note: this morning at around 09:45 EST, I saw six military Chinook helicopters fly from north-west (Huntsville, ON) to south-east (Toronto, ON).

[edit on 26-6-2010 by Venetian]


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 12:10 PM by Patriotgal
reply to post by acrux



Mmm... I have a rifle, accurate (for a torso shot), to 1500M. THAT "close-enough", for you? Of course, my airplane, has a BIT more range.


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 04:12 PM by ipsedixit
It is just after 5:00 PM here in Toronto and I just got back from the pub where I was having a beer and a burger and watching the end of the US/Ghana soccer match at the World Cup.

Just to set the scene a little. The pub was populated by the usual group of semi-sloshed regulars, who were all cheering for the Americans. The reason for this is that the barmaid, who is the mascot of the place, adored by all, including me, is a girl from Detroit. She is everything one could ever wish for in a barmaid. A tall, slim and stacked beauty, shining with low class allure. She has everyone wrapped around her fingers.

I was cheering, very discreetly, for Ghana.

In overtime Ghana went ahead on a great goal, after the US came into the overtime period playing very tentatively. (Ghana came out like a top NHL team going into overtime . . . all guns blazing! It paid off.)

Anyway, they took a moment to cut to the CBC news where things have erupted in Toronto. There was footage of a burning police car. As soon as that came on the screen the whole pub erupted in cheers! It was hilarious.

(Cut to nerdy academic voiceover.) "What does that tell us about society today, Dr. Melvin?"

"I think it shows very clearly that the people regard the police as a group that does not serve their interests. I would guess that many pubgoers secretly wish that they were less inebriated, that they had less of a need for anaesthesia and that somehow the police are seen as the hired minions of a class that has little regard for the ordinary working man and that . . ."

"Thankyou Dr. Melvin. Now back to the game."



[edit on 26-6-2010 by ipsedixit]


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 08:18 PM by ipsedixit
Just heard the news on the radio. We are up to four police cars torched at this time (9:07 PM) and thirty three people arrested. Police have said that they are willing to sacrifice hardware to protect lives, including those of the "peaceful" protesters. The police chief is going to give a press conference at any time now. The mayor is blaming the violence on protesters from out of town.

As I write a radio reporter is accusing a labour leader of knowing in advance that the violence would break out "that's why we spent the billion dollars", "I think we know why they had to spend the money, because of these idiots as you (labour leader, Sid Ryan of the Amalgamated Transit Workers Union) said."

The press are definitely trying to justify this spending.

(How many police cars does a billion dollars pay for?)

The labour leader is saying that these meetings ought to be held at the UN or somewhere where other countries could participate as well as the "20".

(This sort of thing happens over and over. I'm beginning to think that the powers that be actually want this sort of uproar to take place. It justifies spending to ramp up the security state. It couldn't work better for advocates of a police state.)

Update from the police chief. Seventy-five people have been arrested. They are going to go after known leaders of violent groups of protesters.


Note: the only direct quotes in the above are from a radio reporter.

[edit on 26-6-2010 by ipsedixit]


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 09:45 PM by acrux
reply to post by Patriotgal
Mmm... I have a rifle, accurate (for a torso shot), to 1500M. THAT "close-enough", for you? Of course, my airplane, has a BIT more range.


Now, now play nice children.


reply posted on 26-6-2010 @ 11:55 PM by whatukno
reply to post by ipsedixit



Interesting.



Reports say black-clad demonstrators broke off from a crowd of peaceful protesters at the G20 summit in Toronto, torching a police cruiser in the financial district and smashing windows with baseball bats and hammers.


Seems to me that the extra police presence is quite justified.

This isn't freedom of speech, this isn't peaceful protests, this is rioting.



You all can't tell me this is all the work of "provocateurs" I don't believe that these rioters need any provocation. I believe that groups go to the G20 summit for the expressed purpose to start a riot. They aren't police in disguise, they aren't secret agents, they are the protesters themselves, who had the intent to do this the entire time.

While I believe that many go to protest peacefully, many others go just to break stuff, start a riot, and then whine and cry when police fight back.

[edit on 6/27/2010 by whatukno]


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 12:47 PM by ipsedixit
reply to post by whatukno


I've been listening to a little of the radio programming today and what I have heard leads me to believe that this so called "Black Bloc" among the protesters are a group much like Al Quaeda, i.e., they are composed of assets of the powers that be and of dupes.

They are in Toronto on the suffrance of the authorities for the purpose of creating a climate of opinion in this city that we need more police presence, more surveillance cameras and that spending massive amounts of money on that sort of thing is justified.

Last night Sid Ryan of the Amalgamated Transit Workers Union called those people idiots. Last night some of them were smashing windows, and breaking into cars owned by the public. Well nobody is that stupid. Nobody is that much of an idiot not to be able to realize the effect of what they are doing. They absolutely know what they are doing.

They are doing their damnedest to turn Toronto into a city just like London in the UK. A security state city.

Why are they doing it? Because money is made doing it. Why are we told that Al Quaeda knocked down the World Trade Center? Because money can be made from it and has been made from it.

Wake up fools. You are being taken to the cleaners again.

For a billion dollars they could have put plywood over every window in Toronto. For a billion dollars they could have infiltrated these groups and arrested the ringleaders several summits ago.

They don't want to control this phenomenon. They want to continue to make use of it as they have made use of Al Quaeda. Wake up people before you give your jailers another big raise in pay.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags