David Icke…..Ufology’s Worst Ambassador, page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 02:25 PM by Mumbotron
You obviously do not know what you are talking about .
www.abovetopsecret.com... here's a good thread about the Franklin affair (proven child sex scandal in the white house). As far as the Satanism goes... it would be more accurate to call it Luciferianism and I would start by looking up the terms : Albert Pike and Lucifer in your web search . I'll have to go with maybe not on this one.

edit to add: Icke is a disinformation artist because he adds the reptilian shape shifter mumbo-jumbo to the mix which makes it all sound like lies.

[edit on 07/17/2009 by Mumbotron]


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 03:59 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by RyannVonDoom



The lottery is not evolution and research. It has no cycle. It has no pattern. It has nothing to predict. So that is a straw man fallacy.

Elixir of life? Micro probes which attract free radicals + stem cells. Know why I know that? Research.

Riddle of steel? All I know is that's a video game. wtf?

10,000 years ago thee world was falling out of an ice age.

67 million years ago the world was a wasteland with lots of wind, birds, fish, and a few shrews.

Knowledge defeats ignorance. Simply put, the human form sucks. This is why we use tools to do things, not our bodies.

There have been millions upon millions of species on earth. only 1% of life forms ever on Earth are alive today. So take the vast diversity of life today, and times it by 100. That is all the life forms of Earth.

Of those life forms, only 3 or 4 have had the human form.

Of those 3 or 4, only one has survived to what we are today.

How many intelligent animals are there alive today?

Man
Dolphins
whales
Crows
Parrots
Cuttle fish
Octopus
Squid
apes
Gorillas
so many more

How many of those are like man?

1.

Not to mention mankind is an easy species to go extinct. Not until the last 50 or so years in the whole of our 50,000 years of existence have we had the capacity to survive disasters. And we are ever more likely to kill ourselves off, making a second species that looks and acts like us ever less likely.

Mathematics, my dear. Probability and numbers.

It is simply unlikely for humanoid aliens to be out there when it was already a flook chance we would evolve here in the first place. It is far more likely for other species to have evolved intelligence without the humanoid form.

Also, limitations are the progenitor of civilization and technology. So again, those species more limited will be more intelligent. Mankind is already so limited, and we are this smart.

In the end. The immensely low almost null chance that the human form would evolve again makes it all but a joke to think aliens look like us. They are far more likely to look like birds or dolphins.


My personal favorite is Half Life's Combine

(SPOILERS)










[edit on 25-6-2010 by Gorman91]

[edit on 25-6-2010 by Gorman91]

[edit on 25-6-2010 by Gorman91]


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 04:28 PM by ocker
Originally posted by cripmeister
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to
post by Maybe...maybe not



How does it feel to have just advertised for David Icke?

He clearly doesn't mind the negative attention, maybe he goes out of his way to generate it - so how nice of you to give it to him.

You just fed a troll who needed no feeding.



That's a cheap attempt at making the OP look stupid if you ask me Why not contribute with something useful to this discussion? I know you're familiar with Icke, why not share your thoughts?


Glad no one asked you and cheap shots from yourself don't sit well either ..And as Exuberant1 said that "Icke does not mind the negative attention and maybe he goes out of his way to generate it"

I'd say his input is useful and Exuberant shared what he thought

Grow up

Ocker


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 04:31 PM by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by MarrsAttax



MarrsAttax.....


From this MMN concludes that Icke is damaging Ufology.You have to admit that is a weak assertion. Firstly, he's not a ufologist and I dispute that most people define him as such so how can he damage Ufology's reputation?


Icke is clearly associated with Ufology. Very importantly, those who are on the fringes of Ufology looking in will never take Ufology seriously because in their lack of knowledge, they will just hear Icke talking about "aliens", throw us all in that "basket" & laugh at us, or walk away, or both.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 04:40 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Annee



Because the humanoid form is for mammals. Reptilians would not be humanoid.

Only a desert world would generate a reptilian intelligence. And such a world would develop warmblooded species as the dominate because warm blooded handle heat better. IE, feathered bird-like species.

The biochemical that creates scales is one small mutation away from a feather. That is why on Earth, every single place lizards are, Birds do better.

And birds, as the crow proves, do not need a humanoid form to be intelligent.


Ergo, both reptilians and humanoid aliens are not likely.


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 04:43 PM by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to
post by Maybe...maybe not


How does it feel to have just advertised for David Icke?
He clearly doesn't mind the negative attention, maybe he goes out of his way to generate it - so how nice of you to give it to him.
You just fed a troll who needed no feeding.


Ex1.....

It appears you have finally found some manners & courtesy & subsequently enough nerve to take me off ignore.

Based on the quality of your response which comprises one of your normal off topic, smart alec remarks, I suggest you have either.....

Not read or not comprehended my opening post properly (or both).....

Or.....

Determined you will be willfully obfuscatious because you do not have the knowledge & discussion skills to address the topic of the thread.

On the extremely small chance you desire to participate in the discussion, what is your position on that which I posted?

Regards
Maybe...maybe not


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 05:01 PM by -Blackout-
reply to post by RyannVonDoom



I dont see any view pushing here by MMN. He is bringing forth facts about David Icke. Facts that a lot of Icke supporters are not bringing to the table.

Look, if someone wants to support a borderline schizophrenic, then that is their problem. I for one will not take part in the crap that Icke believes.


reply posted on 25-6-2010 @ 05:01 PM by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by LiveForever8



LiveForever8…..


Nope, I still have to disagree with you I'm afraid


Well…..it wouldn’t be much of a discussion if everybody agreed with me!

Actually, that happened in a recent thread…..everybody agreed with everybody else & the discussion sort of fizzled out until some dissenters started to rip & tear again!


I don't think Icke has ever been an ambassador for Ufology.


Here’s what I said previously:

Very importantly, those who are on the fringes of Ufology looking in will never take Ufology seriously because in their lack of knowledge, they will just hear Icke talking about "aliens", throw us all in that "basket" & laugh at us, or walk away, or both.



I also don't see a problem with him making money from people interested in his theories.


It didn’t worry me TOO much until he started applying such a strong focus to this unsubstantiated, nasty material.


Icke damages people?


Absolutely!


How exactly?


Icke damages people trying to take a serious approach to Ufology.

Icke damages the people at who he has aimed his nasty, unsubstantiated accusations & fantasies.

Icke damages the gullible people who have their psychotic, paranoid fantasies reinforced by his material.

Icke damages the gullible people who scrimp & save to purchase his material & see him speak, when they otherwise cannot afford to & would not do so if Icke stopped telling his lies & fantasies.


I just don't see why you have singled out David Icke


I have not ”singled out David Icke”…..

I have started threads about other very problematic figures including Greer, Maussan, Rutter/Reed, etc…


probably because he is an easy target


You can see from this thread, here on ATS Icke has not been ”an easy target”.

That is what I expected when I established this thread.


his reptilian theory


…..is a complete fantasy that Icke has morphed into an even nastier paedophile / satanic fantasy, all with the sole intention of making money & gaining attention.


but he is no different from the hundreds of other theorists


Yes he is…..he has taken all this to a new, extremely nasty low level.

That is the focus of my post.


the majority of whom are more Ufology based than Icke ever has been.


As I said above, people associate him strongly with Ufology because they do not know any better.

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not


[edit on 25-6-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



the whole \'deny ignorance\' thing
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
Mike Bara says Apollo "camera negatives" were airbrushed
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Creepy Illuminati Clock Counting Down Sept 9th, 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags
Is large ammunition becoming hard to come by?
  Posted 6 days ago with 0 member flags