posted on Jun, 24 2010 @ 07:57 PM
I must admit. Most arguments i see from believers and atheist alike, sounds incredible ignorant.
I find the faires and unicorns argument really stupid because how can you compare God with a unicorn. However i do get what they mean. Maybe you can
compare the God of the bible with a unicorn, because they could be both a work of fiction, however, God is considered the ultimate creator, i mean,
our universe do exists, we are here are we not? So you could consider the concept of God as a scientific theory, because it has just as much evidence
as any other theory regarding the start of of the universe (If there even is one), the big bang being the most popular. I know of the pictures being
taken of the big bang or whatever, but still, it's just some stupid theory based on a bunch of pictures(Not really into all of this, so please
correct me if i'm wrong)
Even Einstein said that there has to be a creator of the universe, just not a personal one. A unicorn has no reason to exist, but God do, whatever
shape or form he/she/it is in, and whatever dimension he is from. Is God consiousness? Is God Alien? Is God Energy? Is he the whole universe? God has
a reason to exists, as the creator of us and the universe. I get it's like a easy way out of figuring out what really created our universe, since
there is no evidence for it. It's like a excuse not to think, i know, it's not the scientific way. But still, believing in a God of some sort is
much more valid, than believing in a unicorn, because he's like a theory of creation.
But i agree, the god of the bible is like believing in a unicorn. If god enteracted with humans, where is he today? Also the god of the bible sounds
really evil, not someone i would like to meet!! Not someone who is suppose to be all loving and good.