My unexpected discovery. The Hollow Earth Theory., page 5

reply to post by Kandinsky

---

Come on Kandinsky. Whatever you will say will not make this topic less fascinating.

I only tried to get everything on a pile. I'm not that floaty Really.

reply to post by jymmyjaymes

---

Sorry, just could NOT resist (the devil made me do it, sorry to OP):

Originally posted by jymmyjaymes
Our creator wastes not

Errrmmm...what about the Human appendix?

The polar hole in the north pole has been observed and people have taken picture of it from the Google Earth. But can this prove that the entire interior of the earth is hollow? I don't think so. To prove the entire interior of the earth is hollow, you need show much more than the Earth's north polar hole.

The magma, volcano, sea water, oil reserve, etc has to be located within the thin crust of the earth if the hollow earth theory is correct, which is not likely.

If you have noticed that the Saturn, Jupiter as well as the Earth has the polar holes, it should be obvious that these polar holes are the result of the rotating motion of the celestial objects. Something related to gravity.

In fact, the theory of dipole gravity proposed byDr. E. J. Jeongpredicted the presence of the polar holes and the equatorical rings of the fast rotating planetary objects, which means that the interior of the object doesn't have to be hollow to have this peculiar phenomenon.

It is just the second order gravity at work.

reply to post by notsoperfect

---

The polar hole in the north pole has been observed and people have taken picture of it from the Google Earth.

?? Oh, you mean the pattern of CLOUDS that 'resemble' a hole?

Let me ask...since you brought it up...do you know that the geologic North Pole, the part of the Earth's crust that is there, is covered by Ocean? Namely, the Arctic Ocean.

Furhter, did you know that the geologic South Pole is located in Antarctica?

SO...if there is a "hole" at either end...is the continent of Antarctica 'plugging' it in the south, and why doesn't the "hole" in the north act like a giant bathtub drain???

AND....(this will blow your mind)....somebody should tell the Russians, because they planted a flag on the ocean floor, at the north pole....

www.guardian.co.uk...



!Score! one for Russia, eh??

reply to post by Sinter Klaas

---

Yeah I know, but it wouldn't be the same if I stopped posting salt on the boards

You've got ATS nailed and live up to the avatar in every post. You're a Premier member in my opinion

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Sinter Klaas

---

First of all, if the centrifugal force is that strong, why aren't we flying off from the Earth's surface? That force exists, but is much weaker than gravity (regardless of what causes gravity).

Well strike centrifugal force. Gravity comes from a different source all together.
It has to or we would be on the wrong side.

Also, do you know that flights from North America to Asia pass over the north pole, right? If there is a large hole there I suppose someone must have seen it by now, and I don't think that everybody is witholding that information or that they are all government people.

Nope I've only been on a plane once. For only two hours. Maybe that will get me to Norway but...

As for some of the "evidence", anyone can make a map and say it's Egyptian or say something about any topic, but that doesn't make it true.

yeah...
I've spilled paint that ended up looking just the same.

And I don't see how the behaviour of the magnetic poles is any different from what is expected from what is supposed to be something like a generator running inside a constant shower of electrically charged particles from the Sun.

Well... I understand they don't fully understand what exactly does create the magnetic shield. If it is just pressure that heats up the core... Then venus must be hot inside to. Venus has even a cloud layer that is much havier then our atmosphere ?
Not so long ago I read about the oceans being responsible. Does that mean Jupiter has oceans to ? The sun cold have oceans formed of plasma. What about Neptune ?
Neptune has auriolis borealis. So it must have a magnetic field. Does neptune have an iron molten core or oceans ? Neptune has also a perfect hexaganal on its pole.
Please if you can tell me what makes that possible.

In conclusion, I still think that the hollow Earth theory explains much less than the not hollow version.

I agree. But I think it is a cool story nonetheless.

Thanks

reply to post by Kandinsky

---

You are are right. It needs to be said.

Don't flatter me to much... Before you know it I'll get arrogant and start acting like a diva

Thanks

I love the Hollow Earth Theory. Unfortunately, i don't think it's real. However, if it was out there, you'd think these vacationers would how seen it:

The trip will cost almost £18,000 and involve flying to Punta Arenas in southern Chile to connect with a four-and-a-half-hour flight on to Patriot Hills, where accommodation is in double-lined tents and washing facilities comprise a bowl of hot water and a sponge.
The flight to the Pole itself takes six hours, affording views of the Polar plateau, dramatic crevasses and the wind-whipped snow effect called sastrugi. Passengers will spend up to four hours at the geographic South Pole – 90º south, 0º west – and visit the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station.
They will be able to take photographs at the Pole, visit the station shop and stamp postcards with a special South Pole postmark. The only wildlife may be the odd off-course skua seabird. They can expect almost no humidity, high winds, a temperature as low as -28C (-20F) and a pressure altitude of about 3,230m (10,600ft).

Link

reply to post by Sinter Klaas

---

OK, I'll play....

If and I repeat if, a hollow earth would be reality.

(Adjusting science fiction/fantasy hat...)

OK, all set, let's go! ---

That would mean the current understanding of gravity would be wrong.

Which aspect of our understanding of gravity?

Certainly not how it's calculated, and measured. That is pretty clear, has been for centuries. IF there were some "glitch" in how gravitational forces work, then it would have been noticed long ago, especially since we've been involved in spaceflight technology.

The fundamental forces of gravity, and how it influences motion on a cosmic scale, such as our Solar System for instance, is also well understood, and the math is irrefutable.


But, as to "understanding" gravity, in another sense? Meaning, the full and complete theory of gravity, and its origins?

THAT is a bit of a debate, in cosmological circles, and theoretical physics arenas. It is, for want of better term, the 'mechanism' within the fabric of space/time that causes any mass to exert a force that we have labeled 'gravity'. That's the Einsteinian view, that has worked so far....

It (gravity) is measurable, predictable, mathematically repeatable in the equations; but the actual nature of our Universe, the real reason things act as they do, is still partially hidden from view.

The Universe is a bit inscrutable, in that sense...teasing us with a glimpse, but not the entire story...yet.

Because there's a hot debate about whether gravity obeys the limit of EM radiation (speed of light), (which, if you posit a 'graviton', or particle that 'carries' gravity, or so-called gravity 'waves'....see, it gets esoteric...)....or if it's intantaneous everywhere, all at once....

TOP minds are agonizing over these concepts, as we speak (or read).

Is that what you meant?



[edit on 24 June 2010 by weedwhacker]

reply to post by weedwhacker

---

Yes that is what I meant.

So gravity can be calculated. Only thing is that the source is not mass. Cause that would screw up the theory.

I believe Mnemeth is convinced there is another cause. Something electric.

Seriously. The Einstein method is not really following Occam's razor. Fat to complex.

Just don't ask me how much...

reply to post by freighttrain

---

A black hole at the center of the earth? What exactly is it consuming? If it is an observable size, enough to cause it to radiate light due to the particles at its center and event horizon being (Consumed, destroyed, excited...take your pick), then it would have destroyed the earth from the inside out.

Not trying to troll or criticize but, it just makes no sense.

reply to post by freighttrain

---

A so called holographic universe or are you talking about something else ?

New Crop Circle Hackpen Hill Cube
  Posted 16 days ago with 92 member flags

Get ready to find yourself in a whirlwind of other worldly activity
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags

Crop Circles Explained - Hidden Messages From Aliens & ET\'s ?
  Posted 13 days ago with 24 member flags

Man Made Ancient Pyramids Found on Antarctica???
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags

The Flat Earth theory, With Interviews from believers
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags

James Cameron the revealer & programmer?
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags

Secrets Revealed 2
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags

Mars: The Old Earth?
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: