It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My fear is that the goal of NIDS is to dominate and control the flow of UFO information and to infiltrate organizations such as MUFON, through their vast financial resources.
I may be wrong on this.
I am not sure.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Bigelow's motivations for making the comment of people being directly/indirectly killed by ET has prompted all the interest. Was it a slip of the tongue or clever statement to attract attention?
Originally posted by Norio Hayakawa
This is why I still have a difficult time trusting the ultimate goal of organizations such as the National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS), financed and headed by Robert Bigelow of Las Vegas.
Col. John Alexander, I believe, was under the payroll of Robert Bigelow in the 1990s.
(He still my be, even today).
My fear is that the goal of NIDS is to dominate and control the flow of UFO information and to infiltrate organizations such as MUFON, through their vast financial resources.
I may be wrong on this.
I am not sure.
I do not think Bigelow was talking about UFOs intentionally harming people. Rather, I think he meant it in an indirect fashion, such as the Thomas Mantell case.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Bigelow's motivations for making the comment of people being directly/indirectly killed by ET has prompted all the interest. Was it a slip of the tongue or clever statement to attract attention?
I do not think Bigelow was talking about UFOs intentionally harming people. Rather, I think he meant it in an indirect fashion, such as the Thomas Mantell case.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Bigelow's motivations for making the comment of people being directly/indirectly killed by ET has prompted all the interest. Was it a slip of the tongue or clever statement to attract attention?
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Bigelow's motivations for making the comment of people being directly/indirectly killed by ET has prompted all the interest. Was it a slip of the tongue or clever statement to attract attention?
I do not think Bigelow was talking about UFOs intentionally harming people. Rather, I think he meant it in an indirect fashion, such as the Thomas Mantell case.
I don't see why Mantell has to be brought into conversations about UFOs. The facts do not support the fantasy. He died 'cause he was a hot dogger, ignored the need for oxygen at high altitudes and his foolishness 'caused his death because he didn't know what a Skyhook balloon was. He disobeyed and paid the ultimate price.
the most recent argument made from the bigelow spin camp is that he was referring to "Brazil UFO Invasion OF 1977" which reported deaths and injuries to humans from ufos.
Originally posted by Hongkongphooey
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Bigelow's motivations for making the comment of people being directly/indirectly killed by ET has prompted all the interest. Was it a slip of the tongue or clever statement to attract attention?
I do not think Bigelow was talking about UFOs intentionally harming people. Rather, I think he meant it in an indirect fashion, such as the Thomas Mantell case.
I don't see why Mantell has to be brought into conversations about UFOs. The facts do not support the fantasy. He died 'cause he was a hot dogger, ignored the need for oxygen at high altitudes and his foolishness 'caused his death because he didn't know what a Skyhook balloon was. He disobeyed and paid the ultimate price.
Are you serious? Just because some debunker suggested this is the case, it does not make it so! Mantell was not the only pilot witness and radar was tracking the object as well. Just a question, what kind of balloon can outrun an airplane, even a slow one?