What did the Jews do to make Hitler want to kill them?, page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 8-12-2011 @ 03:41 PM by fakedirt
reply to post by smallpeeps



hello smallpeeps,
i was researching newton just recently. i got the feeling somehow it was mapped out for him. guess any ongoing enquiries into his past activities have just about dried up! perhaps his zeal towards war with iran will have an appealing aroma higher up the ladder.
btw as always a work in progress.
regards fakedirt.



reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 09:13 AM by smallpeeps
Time to bounce this gem of a thread.


www.ynetnews.com...


[...]

During his visit, Dempsey lit the memorial "Eternal Flame" torch and laid a wreath at the Yizkor tent. The US general stated that the US will work together with Israel to make sure that such atrocities never happen again.


Caution! These Israeli sites have many cookies and click-crap so I am sorry for this link, but it's the only one I could find.

Anyway, point is this: The US did not bomb one single concentration camp, though they knew these existed.

So the General's comment above, is funny, because in a way, he's saying "This time we won't preserve concentration camps like we did in WW2" ...And yet, right now, we are creating another WW2 situation with the giant concentration camp called "The Palestine Balfour/Rothschild Protectorate".

Ask yourself: Would Israel have been given their world state, if Hitler's "Transfer Agreement" hadn't been kept secret? Ask yourself: Now that we know the transfer agreement existed, and populated the Rothschildian/Balfour Palestine theft, and since the US didn't stop the horror:revelation of the camps, then doesn't that explain why West Germany ended up funding Rothschild/Balfour-ville?

Seriously, I am an American, but in order to be a General, I guess I'd have to pretend I didn't know history? Thank God nobody's asking me to be a General because I couldn't make ignorant statements like this on a global scale.

I am hoping that if Israel goes suicide against Iran, that our commanders will mutiny against the Zio problem>war>reparations dialectic modality. Israel essentially is saying that if we don't support them, they'll kill not just Americans and Iranians, but the whole world. You really can't blame the US Generals for being scared of what they've built. But face it fellas, JFK is dead and he was the only one who tried to keep nukes from Rothschildian/Balfour-ville. Once they whacked him, none of you had the balls to step up, and so 50 years later we are basically screwed. Yeah thanks for nothing wartards.


reply posted on 4-2-2012 @ 08:58 AM by smallpeeps
Hmm, British-Zio military guerrillas circa 1941?


www.zionism-israel.com...


Palmach - (Hebrew) - (or Palma'h - Plugot Ma'hatz) - A Jewish military force in Palestine created with the cooperation of the British by Yitzhak Sadeh in 1941 to help defend Palestine against the possibility of invasion from Syria, which was under the control of the Vichy French government. Palmach eventually had a few thousand fighters and evolved into the underground spearhead commando force of the Haganah.


I guess they were the big winners since they established a new International State.

What did Hitler think, in 1941, as he had been champing at the bit for almost 8 years since the 1933 racial accords which were not expected by him (as I explained). So it's no wonder that by 1941, Hitler kinda almost know he's the sacrificial lamb, because Rothschild has already got UK rebels in Palestine, and Hitler is realizing in 1941 that Turkey won't let him through, so Hitler has to follow Himmler's lead, which is to just massacre the slavs and export (secretly) some of his Jews to Palestine.

It can be said and easily observed, that when Hitler called Rommel's tanks to halt, and allowed the Brits to escape miraculously at Dunkirk, he was cognizant of his weak position in relation to the fact the UK Zio and Attaturk forces would conspire to keep him bottled up. Once Hitler saw that, he was forced down a road, there was no way for him to get through Turkey or over the caucuses though he did try and Naxis forces did reach the summits of the Caucus ranges, they were already bled halfway dry by then.

The key is 1933 when the racialists sniped Hitler and denied him the right to do war at that time. Over time he was used, to create the need for reparations and the dialectical spiltting >< reuniting of Germany during 1945-1995, which Adenauer and his student, oversaw.

It is simple to see that Hitler is nervous in the film from 1933 when he is being filmed just as the uber-Jew-hatred is being stoked up. In the film (see documentary footage of 1933 racial accords) Hitler looks like George Bush reading 'My Pet Goat'. He got bushwhacked and was not allowed to do war in 1933.

So then after that, it's a slow matriculation of Hitler's advantage by UK powers. Hitler was nervous all along that they might set him up but he seems to have held out that maybe he could be the King of the new UK Rothschild state, since UK was run by Habsburgs. But over time he realized that he was doomed to be the fool who creates the Rothschild state on his own grave.

Between 1941 and 1945 Hitler had only one thing he could do, and that was to massacre Poland and the middle countries. Notice that in the end, even after Hitler is gone/dead, Himmler calmly surrenders to the authorities. This man and his Jesuit-raised counterpart Joe Steel, had together, presided over the single greatest five year slaughter in the history of the world. Millions dead. Why would Himmler be so calm at the end? Why did Joe Steel survive so long when clearly he had the Russian people as his own enemy within, and had decapitated his own army prior to WW2? It is the Rome cult and its banker hoffjuden who arranged the 20th Century to be this way. Sorry, but that's the truth.


reply posted on 4-2-2012 @ 09:59 AM by smallpeeps
Image below: June 7, 1944 "Cromwell" tank named after great UK/Zio tyrant Oliver Cromwell being unloaded onto Sword beach:

ww2db.com...


Now please observe that the modern Israeli IDF sees the Cromwell tank as being the logical ancestor of what are "Habakkuk's Chariots of Salvation":

IDF medal showing Cromwell tank:


IDF medal showing biblical chariots as ancestor of Cromwell tank:


Website in question, very informative:
idf-armor.blogspot.com...


...And so therefore the question is this:

Considering that Israel/Rothschild intrigues began prior to 1914 and WW1, then what are we to make of the events in the world, between the time of Habbakuk, and Cromwell? Quite a long span between 612BC and 1645AD

Habbakuk it seems, was a tyrant for the Babylon segment of the rabbinate, it's no wonder that the talmudists of today, see him as one of their great ones, along with Bar Kochba of the post-Jesus failed revolt in AD 132AD. Habbakuk is a voicebox for Chaldean >< Jerusalem connections.

The rabbinate of Habbakuk's time, succeeded in getting the Jerusalem >< Persian temple of 570BC built. This was the beginning of Hillel's line, who was alive at the time of Jesus, and his ancestor Judah Ha-Nasi who compiled the mishnah in Babylon after the Jerusalem-massacre had been completed. Around 400 AD as Rome declined, the talmud was being perfected between Jerusalem and Babylon. This is all easily verifiable at your local library inside a set of books called "Encyclopedia Judaica".


en.wikipedia.org...


Biblical account

Because the book of Habbakuk consists of five oracles about the Chaldeans (Babylonians), and the Chaldean rise to power is dated circa 612 BCE, it is assumed he was active about that time

[...]

Habakkuk is unique among the prophets in that he openly questions the wisdom of God (1:3a, 1:13b). In the first part of the second chapter, the Prophet sees the injustice among his people and asks why God does not take action: "1:2 Yahweh, how long will I cry, and you will not hear? I cry out to you 'Violence!' and will you not save?"
- (World English Bible). The book of Habbakuk consists of five oracles about the Chaldeans (Babylonians) and a song of praise to God.


Here are some interesting questions as Homs is thrown into chaos at this time:

1: Homs is near the site of the ancient battle of Kadesh after which the Ramesites made a peace pact with Babylon "for eternity". This peace pact clearly shuns the shasu/amurru/bedouinesque tribes (see "Jethro" of Moses' time) who are NOT included in the great treaty. In effect this agreement after the battle of Kadesh is the first international alliance against bedouin tribes. Remember that Akhenaten had fled (He is Moses) about 60-70 years prior to this accord in 1274bc: Akhenaten is the "seed of Israel" who stood against the priests. He is Osarseph, Moses, as I have explained here.


www.reshafim.org.il...


"If a great person flees from the country of Egypt and he escapes to the country of Amurru or a city and he comes to the king of Amurru, then Benteshina, king of the country of Amurru, has to take hold of him and take him to the king of the country of Hatti ; and Hattusili, the great king, the king of the country of Hatti, shall have him to be taken to Reamasesa, the great king, the king of the country of Egypt"

-- The peace treaty between Ramses II and Hattusili III

also:

en.wikipedia.org...


The city was captured by the great pharaoh Seti I during his campaign to Syria. Kadesh had been lost to Egypt since the time of Akhenaten. Tutankhamun and Horemheb had both failed to recapture the city from the Hittites. Seti I was successful here and defeated a Hittite army that tried to defend it. He triumphantly entered the city together with his son Ramesses II and erected a victory stela at the site. His success was only temporary. As soon as Seti I returned to Egypt, the Hittite king, Mursilis II, marched south to take Kadesh and make it a stronghold of the Hittite defenses in Syria. The Hittites ruled through a viceroy in Carchemish.



2: At this battle, were the largest chariot armies ever assembled. What is the origin of the chariot in A: THE BIBLE, and B: EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY?

3: Further we must ask: In this context, harking back to 1274BC at the Battle of Kadesh and two great chariot (tank) armies facing off there --Who today at Kadesh has the batter tank? Who has the better chariot? And further, who designed the tech that went into the Merkava battle chariot?


reply posted on 4-2-2012 @ 11:04 AM by LucidDreamer85
Originally posted by Razimus
Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Why does everyone always associate the Holocaust with just the Jews? More people died in those camps. Even other Germans.


The yellow stars they made the Jews wear, the singling out of the one race, yes mentally challenged, etc Germans were killed, but the bulk were the Jews.

As for the OP, the superficial answer is going to be Hitler believed in
Aryanism, to the extreme, why did he believe in this nonsense? It goes deeper than what most have been told, but that is for another thread.

edit on 8-12-2011 by Razimus because: (no reason given)



No false....The bulk were Slavics....from Russian ukraine and every other country nearby.

There were about 6 million jews murdered.....there were more than 8 million salvics murdered.....Russian knows this and says nothing though...

Not sure why.
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 16 days ago with 87 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 9 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 11 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 16 days ago with 57 member flags