It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mate to enlighten you some watch the video maybe the puzzlement might seem more factfinding. maybe...not
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by InfaRedMan
Your sig graphic tells me all i need to know about your motives in posing this question.
The fact that you could easily have answered your own question regarding whistleblowers and witnesses, but didn't tells me you are actively engaged in disinfo of the UFO topic in general
and seek to divide opinion and deliberately ignore the obvious hoards of people, both high profile and otherwise, who have come forward with their experience of the subject to date.
Originally posted by Scramjet76
reply to post by InfaRedMan
Bingo IRM! We would expect thousands, yet those who step forward can never fully be vouched for.
-SJ76
www.thefourthkind.net...
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
I haven't read this thread in its entirety, but SBS Dateline had a program a month or so ago about WikiLeaks and specifically Assange, after the program there was a live chat with the reporter Mark Davis and Julian Assange on their website
Live Chat with Julian Assange on SBS
I put the question to him about UFO's, and his response was something to the effect of "Nothing definitive..."
So yeah,
Originally posted by Netties Hermit
reply to post by InfaRedMan
Hi InfaRedMan,
I seem to be the only one on this thread that is disturbed by how derogatory that article is towards the UFO community (or as he puts it, "that lonely, usually inept group of investigators".
Originally posted by pauldamo
reply to post by InfaRedMan
i suppose all the UFO whistle blowers think that the disclosure project is the appropriate place for UFO matters,as they can stand up personally to tell their story and i think that they are safer in larger numbers,just a thought.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
If whistleblowers are smart they will choose to disclose through a reputable source because it will only lend credence to their claims.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
I have always said this, and see that others here ponder it as well, and that is maybe there is no evidence, no secret cabal nwo types, no men in black, no real government knowledge being hidden, thus no whistle-blowers to come forward.
I think that is the most likely explanation in this case. I would bet that the governments of the world don't know anymore about this than you or I do. Perhaps that is the hardest explanation to swallow because it flies in the face of what we want to believe.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Cheers Son of Will.
I will say that although you can compartmentalize the evidence, you cannot compartmentalize the will of others.