posted on Jun, 23 2010 @ 02:22 AM
Originally posted by kevinunknown
I have a different take on this. I do not support the death penalty but not because of some enlightened sense of morality, I just think it’s the
easy way out. These people should be made to suffer for their crimes. For the likes of this c**t I would have him castrated then I think he should be
sent to a hard labour camp for a good 40 years. He should be forced to live with just enough to keep him alive for example minimum bland food and
basic accommodation, none of this have a ps3 to keep you entertained crap. I would apply this to all paedophiles, murders and rapists
The more I think about this, the more I think you're right, actually. I worry about the death penalty because of the risk of killing an innocent
person, but also yeah, it is maybe the easy way out. Question is though, will we ever have a government that is firm enough to agree to this kind of
punishment? I'd like to think so but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Prison is no more than a holiday camp for scum.
Exactly, that's what I was trying to say earlier, but you put it more eloquently.
As for the person/s who said the guy need rehabilitation - don't make me laugh. People who commit murder and rape are inherently evil and no amount
of 'rehabilitation' will change them. They don't need help to make them into decent citizens, they need hard punishment for what they did. It's
this type of namby-pamby attitude and human rights for criminals that has got the UK into the mess its in. For crying out loud, we're living in a
country where a burglar can sue you if he hurts himself while robbing your house! Justice is a joke, it really is.
Jon Venables was evil when he was ten years old. Anyone who's seen his photo should be able to see that. He should have been properly punished
then, he wasn't some 'innocent child' who didn't know what he was doing. In my opinion, if you're old enough to commit a crime, you're old
enough to get punished for it.