It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rahm Emanual expected to quit White House?

page: 2
12
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 



Perhaps Rahm will jump ship prior to some unfortunate disclosures in the Blago trial where he may just take a bullet for Obama like a good Mossad agent would do.


If I had to go with a reason for him leaving, that'd be it. I bet your right on the money.

--airspoon


reply to post by neo96
 



i hope in 2010 the obama becomes a lame duck
i hope in 2012 hes gone......................long goneeeeeeeeeeeee.


Even if Obama does get voted out, it's not as if we are going to get someone honest in. It doesn't even mean that we will get someone better in. As much as I don't like Obama, I don't really care whether or not he gets voted out because we are more than likely going to get someone else either just as bad or worse. Could you imagine if Giuliani got elected?

You know, I said the same thing about Bush. When everyone was griping and moaning about Bush, I said the same thing, and low and behold, we got Obama. We just have to come to terms with the fact that whoever we get in office, is just going to further an agenda that goes against the interests of the American people.

--airspoon




posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 07:51 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


Rob Emanuel is a horrible person and a crazy man. I'm glad to see him go. It reinforced my view that Obama is a slow socialist. Not too fast.



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by airspoon
 



Even if Obama does get voted out, it's not as if we are going to get someone honest in. It doesn't even mean that we will get someone better in. As much as I don't like Obama, I don't really care whether or not he gets voted out because we are more than likely going to get someone else either just as bad or worse. Could you imagine if Giuliani got elected?


You need to look at the facts with a less partisan eye.

Obama has been such a miserable failure because he has no previous executive (decision making) experience to rely on. He runs and hides at every challenge. Sixty days to face the Gulf disaster, while taking time for vacation and daily golf?

He's a boy. He doesn't know how to lead.

Giuliani would have had the full force of the US resources down there by end of week one. Obama can't shine his shoes.



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 09:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by airspoon
 



Even if Obama does get voted out, it's not as if we are going to get someone honest in. It doesn't even mean that we will get someone better in. As much as I don't like Obama, I don't really care whether or not he gets voted out because we are more than likely going to get someone else either just as bad or worse. Could you imagine if Giuliani got elected?


You need to look at the facts with a less partisan eye.

Obama has been such a miserable failure because he has no previous executive (decision making) experience to rely on. He runs and hides at every challenge. Sixty days to face the Gulf disaster, while taking time for vacation and daily golf?

He's a boy. He doesn't know how to lead.

Giuliani would have had the full force of the US resources down there by end of week one. Obama can't shine his shoes.


I have to agree that with each 'election', we are handed a worse and worse stacked deck from which to 'choose'. That is precisely why obama was set up to win again mccain, with his lame campaign promises and corpse appeal. As such, the zionists nwo could simply get whatever they wanted, dump him at mid terms, as usual, and distance themselves when the shtf. He was simply too inexperienced...it was all his fault. As much as I don't admire A Jone's style, he did present this in concept rather well in his 'obama deception'.

I think what we saw with the oil spill non-response from the team in power was a sort of shell shocked response: this can't be happening to me; a no win situation...no way to win by even touching this one...so they let it go on and on. But they are, at this very moment, feverishly twisting this situation back in to a pretzel to demonstrate why we need climate change legislation! They are having trouble breaking away from their insider investments, no matter what tells them otherwise.

Anyway...I think that with all the sensitive computer forecast programs they have, many nwo pols are feeling the backlash, months before it becomes mainstream, and are heading for distancing, and cover. They can hang the whole thing on barry. The next 'president' will re-sign all the bush cheney and now obama paperwork and they'll churn on like nothing bad ever happened. The blago thing is also a factor with barry and rahm, and they are doubtlessly shuffling things to save face. I figure the courts are pretty much owned, however, and are useful only for spitting out in pieces those that got caught. Barry and rahm are not going to be dragged in to the blago thing. Jews have too much influence in the courts for that to happen. Pay to play is just the way it's been for decades. But you don't get caught talking about it.

[edit on 21-6-2010 by davidmann]



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by airspoon
 



Even if Obama does get voted out, it's not as if we are going to get someone honest in. It doesn't even mean that we will get someone better in. As much as I don't like Obama, I don't really care whether or not he gets voted out because we are more than likely going to get someone else either just as bad or worse. Could you imagine if Giuliani got elected?


You need to look at the facts with a less partisan eye.

Obama has been such a miserable failure because he has no previous executive (decision making) experience to rely on. He runs and hides at every challenge. Sixty days to face the Gulf disaster, while taking time for vacation and daily golf?

He's a boy. He doesn't know how to lead.

Giuliani would have had the full force of the US resources down there by end of week one. Obama can't shine his shoes.


Nothing I said in my post was "partisan", and neither is my thinking. If you think that, then you obviously don't even know the meaning of the term, rather you are probably only parroting what you have heard on FOX News or from any number of the pundits who are created and designed to do the thinking for you, so you don't have to think for yourself. In fact, it is because of the fact that Americans have lost the ability of critical self thought, that we find ourselves with this false left-right paradigm, lacking any real semblance of freedom and liberty.

I dislike both Republicans and Democrats or as I like to call them both, Republocrats. The Democratic party and Republican party are just two different sides to the same coin. They only serve to give people a false perception of the left-right paradigm.

If you really look into it, you see that both dominant parties aren't really different at all, at least where it matters. They both only differ on relatively cosmetic issues, while the goal is the same, to screw the American people for the benefit of corporate and special issues.

If you really think that we are going to get someone better in office after Obama or that old Rudy would have been a better choice, then you are fooling yourself and it is you with a partisan mindset. I suggest you start to think for yourself, if you still can that is. After all, you really can't reason with someone who lacks reason.

--airspoon



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 10:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
i hope mr. " never let a great crisis go to waste.." is really gone.

i hope the rest of the cronies follow suit.

you may just get your wish

it seems more people are following
Rahm out the door, more news!!!!
They're dropping like flies !!!!!


WASHINGTON
White House Budget Director Peter Orszag will resign this
year, a Democratic official said Monday night, positioning
him to be the first high-profile member of President Barack
Obama's team to depart the administration.

As director of the Office of Management and Budget, Orszag
holds Cabinet-level rank and a pivotal role in shaping and
defending how the administration spends the public's money.
He quickly emerged from a bureaucratic post to become a
camera-friendly face of Obama's government, often in front
on plans to confront the swelling deficit and to spur the economy.


www.foxnews.com...



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by airspoon
 



Nothing I said in my post was "partisan", and neither is my thinking. If you think that, then you obviously don't even know the meaning of the term, rather you are probably only parroting what you have heard on FOX News or from any number of the pundits who are created and designed to do the thinking for you, so you don't have to think for yourself. In fact, it is because of the fact that Americans have lost the ability of critical self thought, that we find ourselves with this false left-right paradigm, lacking any real semblance of freedom and liberty.


Tsk, tsk, tsk, no need to get personal. It's obvious why you picked Rudy for your response - his success at managing the 9/11 attack by the Islamo-terrorists. You didn't want that to balloon into a comparison with Obama's miserable failure in the Gulf, the issue that will wreck the Dem's this November and again in 2012.

You are obviously a liberal left Democrat. But that's OK too.

And whoTF are you to say that Americans "have lost the ability of critical self thought"?


The Democratic party and Republican party are just two different sides to the same coin. They only serve to give people a false perception of the left-right paradigm.


Talk about parroting something you've heard. Do you even know what that means?

Next time, stick with the issue -Obama stunk up the Gulf of Mexico with his smelly farts of inaction. Stop apologizing for him.

[edit on 21-6-2010 by mishigas]



posted on Jun, 21 2010 @ 11:34 PM
link   
Damn it!!!!

Six to eight months!?

Puhlease. Yesterday would be too soon.

Let's see now, how many good crises has he vampired for his political agenda?



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by airspoon
 



Nothing I said in my post was "partisan", and neither is my thinking. If you think that, then you obviously don't even know the meaning of the term, rather you are probably only parroting what you have heard on FOX News or from any number of the pundits who are created and designed to do the thinking for you, so you don't have to think for yourself. In fact, it is because of the fact that Americans have lost the ability of critical self thought, that we find ourselves with this false left-right paradigm, lacking any real semblance of freedom and liberty.


Tsk, tsk, tsk, no need to get personal. It's obvious why you picked Rudy for your response - his success at managing the 9/11 attack by the Islamo-terrorists. You didn't want that to balloon into a comparison with Obama's miserable failure in the Gulf, the issue that will wreck the Dem's this November and again in 2012.

You are obviously a liberal left Democrat. But that's OK too.

And whoTF are you to say that Americans "have lost the ability of critical self thought"?


The Democratic party and Republican party are just two different sides to the same coin. They only serve to give people a false perception of the left-right paradigm.


Talk about parroting something you've heard. Do you even know what that means?

Next time, stick with the issue -Obama stunk up the Gulf of Mexico with his smelly farts of inaction. Stop apologizing for him.

[edit on 21-6-2010 by mishigas]


I'm far from liberal and I don't believe in the "left-right" paradigm as it is entirely false, therefore I don't perceive myself to be left... or right. Even if I was fooled by the fake left-right paradigm, I wouldn't be left. For those that are still fooled by the left-right paradigm, they would actually see me as being right. I'm a libertarian as I believe that the human being is entitled to liberty, something that is completely foreign to most brain dead Americans.

Also, it's not obvious why I picked Rudy Giuliani, as I just threw a name out there. You can really substitute Rudy with whomever you want, Kerry, W. Bush, Rumsfeld, McCain, Hillary or anyone else that would be paraded in front of us for the Presidency.

Personally, I don't care about Obama and I don't even like him but if the point wouldn't have sailed over your head, you would have realized it.

The point being that it doesn't matter if we throw Obama out of office because we are only going to get someone of equal or lesser value in office to replace him, regardless of where they sit on the so-called left-right paradigm. That's how it has worked since around 1913 and it isn't going to change. It doesn't matter whether they are Republican or Democrat, as both parties are basically the same thing with a few relatively unimportant cosmetic differences, designed to fool the American people into believing they have a choice or that we have an opposition. If people are still too ignorant to see that it doesn't matter whether you vote Democrat or Republican, then we have no hope of even thinking about gaining our freedom and liberty back.

If you allow the punditry to fool you into believing that one candidate or the other is actually going to fight for your interests, then you have obviously lost your ability of critical self thought. Here's why you most likely allow the pundits to do your thinking for you.

You obviously believe that Rudy Giuliani did a great job on 9/11 and took charge. Why do you believe that, were you with Rudy in NYC on that day? Why is it that you think he did such a great job? The corporate media? Which station would that be? FOX News, maybe? Maybe if you thought for yourself, you would see the terrible leadership that was exhibited on and directly after 9/11. There are first responders dying almost everyday because they were lied to about the air quality, yes lied to. There are residents and employees of downtown who were assured that all was safe to return, when the leadership knew that it wasn't. Thousands are sick, dying and dead because the leadership were more interested in the all mighty dollar, then the lives of those they were supposed to be leading. Rudy basically walked around the city, doing nothing useful, while the pundits praised him for taking charge and all the mindless Americans bought it up without even a minimal effort at self thought.

Also, why do you think that Islamo-Fascism was the cause of the attack? I know the whole "Islamo-Fascism" buzz-word that was being thrown around by FOX News and only by FOX News (of the corporate media choices), so that was a dead give-away, especially seeing how even if you do believe that 19 cave-dwelling Arabs pulled this off alone, there is no reason to believe that they were fascists or could even be compared with European fascists of the early 20th century. So, you are basically parroting the term from some pundit that you allow to do the thinking for you. What makes you believe that they are/were fascists? Could it simply be that your pundit of choice labeled them as such so no need to do the research on your own?

Unless you were with Rudy Giuliani on that day, you can't say what his leadership skills were like, unless of course you take the word of some pundit, whose very job description is to do the thinking for their viewers. Furthermore, you are foolish if you think that one party looks out for your interests over the other. They both champion corporate and special interests, at the people's expense. It is the people who still don't realize this because they lack any kind of critical self thinking skills, that allow them to do it and get away with it. We all agree or should agree that a government without opposition is a dangerous entity, exposed to the temptation of tyranny, yet due to people being able to think for themselves, the American government runs without any kind of opposition, completely free from the balancing scales of justice. While the people argue over social welfare or corporate welfare, welfare is being shelled out. The money is leaving your pocket to enter theirs. They keep you busy with irrelevant and unimportant arguments while your being cleaned out and laughed at... at the same time. You can't see that your being cleaned out because you have ceded your critical self thinking skills to the pundits on your favorite corporate media channel, whether it be FOX News, CNN, BBC or MSNBC.

After Bush robbed us blind, the American people went for the "other side" and after Obama robs us blind, we will move back to other side again, only to be robbed some more. It has been the same cycle since the beginning of the 20th Century. Each time, we're being robbed all the same. It really is that obvious, if people would only think for themselves and see what is really going on.

--airspoon



posted on Jun, 22 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by CanadianDream420
He's getting out of the country before things get bad....
Real bad.


Yup, he is probably headed towards his D.U.M.B (Defensive Underground Military Bunker)



new topics




 
12
<< 1   >>

log in

join