It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just 2 Carriers

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:
E_T

posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 11:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by blobby
have elctric armour for tanks ie force fields

Electric armour = NOT force field/shield.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

And if you think small yield nukes could be used as bunker buster without radioactive fallout you're wrong. To contane fallout nuke would have to explode at least about 100 meter underground. With enough speed to penetrate that much dirt impact forces would brake bomb's body.




posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 12:16 PM
link   
the manoveur worked in the falklands
and the argentinians had better aircraft
but we still bet them at the air war

sure u need a protection force but u dont need that amny ships. firstly u have to find the enemy
with a larger vessel much easier
secondly sure it might have only 30 planes but that doest mean it its ineffective. u wouldnt need every plane gaurding it. if u cant find the damm thing u cant hit it
also that bit about the bombmagnet thing, no its not cause its a large target. its about haveing a multi-million pound vessel going up in smoke cause of a lone fighter getting through



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 01:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by E_T
And if you think small yield nukes could be used as bunker buster without radioactive fallout you're wrong.


Who said anything about bunker busters?


E_T

posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hyperen
Who said anything about bunker busters?

In that case radioactive fallout spreads much more effectively.



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
the manoveur worked in the falklands
and the argentinians had better aircraft
but we still bet them at the air war

sure u need a protection force but u dont need that amny ships. firstly u have to find the enemy
with a larger vessel much easier
secondly sure it might have only 30 planes but that doest mean it its ineffective. u wouldnt need every plane gaurding it. if u cant find the damm thing u cant hit it
also that bit about the bombmagnet thing, no its not cause its a large target. its about haveing a multi-million pound vessel going up in smoke cause of a lone fighter getting through






Actually navy carriers lauch their fighters 500miles from the incoming planes and since we have advanced radar with a strike range of 150miles no jet is going to get through especially if you have 80 fighter up in the air protecting it.



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 04:09 PM
link   
actually a lone fighterr could get through 1 stealth fighter could penetrate your airspace quite easily
i mean the frigate managed it



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 06:52 PM
link   
actually sorry to dissapoint you but no other country has a stealth fighter other than the US


[edit on 17-6-2004 by WestPoint23]



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 07:09 PM
link   
How`d you know we may have a bunker full kept secret till we need them



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by WestPoint23
actually sorry to dissapoint you but no other country has a stealth fighter other than the US


[edit on 17-6-2004 by WestPoint23]

thats not strictly true you know
many countries MAY have em and i serosly think the MOD has a couple and come on the russians not haveing stealth planes ,come on, those guys well have stealth



posted on Jun, 17 2004 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Originally posted by WestPoint23
actually sorry to dissapoint you but no other country has a stealth fighter other than the US


[edit on 17-6-2004 by WestPoint23]

thats not strictly true you know
many countries MAY have em and i serosly think the MOD has a couple and come on the russians not haveing stealth planes ,come on, those guys well have stealth






can we plz focus on facts not some imaginary plane that dosnt exist and the russians dont have the tech or the money to build a stealth plane



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 03:50 AM
link   
the whole idea of a stealth plane is that it is stealth. So because of this we wouldnt know about them. Only the US are stupid enough to parade them in front of the world. Also the Us ones arent all that good, didint one get shot down by a third world country?


E_T

posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 05:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by The_Clansman
Also the Us ones arent all that good, didint one get shot down by a third world country?

Gives much credibility to you that you don't even remember what plane it was. (or where)

It happened in Serbia. But I that doesn't mean there's something wrong with plane.
In gulf war "episode 1" they flew through very heavy air defense which was made with equipment from many countries.

EDIT: corrected typo.

[edit on 18-6-2004 by E_T]



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 06:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by E_T

Gives much credibility to you that you don't even remember what plane it was. (or where)

It happened in Serb. But I that doesn't mean there's something wrong with plane.
In gulf war "episode 1" they flew through very heavy air defense which was made with equipment from many countries.


Its Serbia u fool



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 06:13 AM
link   
Are you talking about the F117 that got shot down over Serbia?







posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 06:16 AM
link   
Yes in *cough* SERBIA *cpugh*


E_T

posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 07:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by The_Clansman
Its Serbia u fool

Neither you seem to be able to write flawlessy...
Joten turpa kii tai opettele kirjoittamaan virheettmsti.



Originally posted by Hyperen
Are you talking about the F117 that got shot down over Serbia?

Yep, just that "hopeless diamond".



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by The_Clansman
the whole idea of a stealth plane is that it is stealth. So because of this we wouldnt know about them. Only the US are stupid enough to parade them in front of the world. Also the Us ones arent all that good, didint one get shot down by a third world country?





what? hats the most idiotic thing I have ever heard stealth makes it harder to detect by radar doesn't make the plane invincible and the F-117 got shot down by pure luck not some coordinated attack from the enemy.
and the US can parade them because we already have other stealth planes coming out F-22 also don't forget about other planes that the public doesn't know about



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 09:52 AM
link   
look at the damage done to that plane. How can you call that a 'lucky shot'? A lucky shot would have been clipping a wing or hitting the tail. Just admit it your 'superior' aircraft got shot down by a bunch of peasants and farmers armed with 20 year old technology.



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 09:58 AM
link   
i wonder what the odds are of a stealth jet getting shot down?



posted on Jun, 18 2004 @ 10:28 AM
link   
stealth aircraft are basically only effective at sub sonic speeds cause i think the radar operator would notice a small bird flying at mach 2



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join