It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama to agencies: Don't pay dead people
No more checks to the dead: Gov't creates 'do not pay' list to keep money from going astray
The government sent benefit checks to 20,000 departed Americans over three years, totaling more than $180 million -- a remarkable number that provoked the Obama administration to create a government-wide "do not pay" list as part of its brainstorming for ways to save taxpayer money.
Once the database is up and running, agencies will have to search it before sending out payments. A pre-check check, so to speak.
"We're making sure that payments no longer go to the deceased -- it sounds ridiculous even to say it," acknowledged Vice President Joe Biden in describing the database.
Also planned for inclusion: contractors who've fallen behind in their payments or, even worse, landed in jail, and companies that have been suspended or otherwise deemed ineligible for government work.
"This stuff seems obvious on its face," Biden acknowledged. "The voters will go, 'My God, isn't that happening already?'"
Read more: AP
Do not fly list kid.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
It boggles my mind that this even needs to be done. How are checks still being made out to dead people?
Originally posted by 7even7eas
reply to post by wylekat
the do not pay list should only be legally allowed to cut off the checks of Government checks i assume? of Government Employed?
I see no Government Reason to put anyone who is not employed by the Government on a Do Not Pay list.
$200 million each and every day.
Originally posted by LittleSecret
reply to post by FortAnthem
Or maybe, just maybe they could bring American kids back home from Afghanistan and Iraq, that would save the TAX payer about:
$200 million each and every day.
Damn, that could make every America a millionaire eventually ^^
Once the database is up and running, agencies will have to search it before sending out payments. A pre-check check, so to speak.
Originally posted by lee anoma
Next step?
Stop them from voting!
Zombies really draw votes away from the real contenders.
- Lee
Originally posted by lee anoma
Next step?
Stop them from voting!
Zombies really draw votes away from the real contenders.
- Lee
Originally posted by FortAnthem
I think its to cut off benefit payments to citizens who have died. Things like Social Security and disability payments.
[edit on 6/19/10 by FortAnthem]
Originally posted by LittleSecret
Originally posted by lee anoma
Next step?
Stop them from voting!
Zombies really draw votes away from the real contenders.
- Lee
Damn you are right at that.
If they are getting money, how do we know they are also not voting lol.
Great point ^^
Even if it was sarcastic ^^
Dead voted in governor's race
King County investigating 'ghost voter' cases
At least eight people who died well before the November general election were credited with voting in King County, raising new questions about the integrity of the vote total in the narrow governor's race, a Seattle Post-Intelligencer review has found. www.seattlepi.com
Local 2 Investigates Dead Voters
Investigative reporter Amy Davis shows you how hundreds of voters could sway this year's election -- voters who are not even alive. "All-in-all, a great person, a great woman, just a wonderful person" is how Alexis Guidry described her mother to Local 2 Investigates.
"As far back as I can remember, they've always voted in the election," Guidry said of her parents. The March 2008 Primary was no exception. Voting records show Alexis' mom, Gloria Guidry, cast her ballot in person near her South Houston home.
"It was just very shocking, a little unsettling," said Alexis Guidry.
It's unsettling because Gloria Guidry died of cancer 10 months before the March Primary. www.click2houston.com
I See Dead People Voting Again
And how is it that there are nearly 80,000 dead people still on the voter rolls in New York? Will anyone bother to check to make sure that they're not voting next Tuesday or is that optional? After all, it would require someone checking identification to make sure that someone isn't voting who shouldn't. Who benefits the most from this? Democrats in New York outnumber Republicans by a 4-1 margin.
lawhawk.blogspot.com