posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 08:16 PM
reply to post by Y2Zgt
If the evidence suggests it was an attack, then it is an attack.
If the evidence tells us that a passport survived an airplane crash, when knowing their claim that the same airplane penetrated through steal, or
burned through steal, but didn't burn a passport (I won't believe it, and especially knowing the coincidental force at hand which chucked the
passport of the hijacker, how convenient).
Bullsh1t can easily be smelled, but for someone to argue whether it was Bullsh1t or CowSh1t, is idiotic.
Think about it, we don't know whether 9/11 was Bullsh1t or Cowsh1t, because they are not telling us the truth. So whether it was an inside job or not
is not important, especially when the government won't allow anyone near the evidence.
In conclusion if another attacks occurs, make sure they don't lie to you, and if they do hold them accountable before it is too late.
9/11 is too late, 10 years later, who are you gonna hold accountable, America should have been smarter than to fall for fear mongering propaganda
which led to two oppressive wars in a complete different continent.