It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO/USO Does Not Mean ET.

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:30 PM
link   
I recently posted in this forum, some will know what I'm talking about some of you will not. The thread is gone now, thank goodness so that's that.

I decided to post this because I was amazed by how many people observing a UFO/USO automatically come to the conclusion it was ET in origin with no evidence to suggest so.

Now you may say "Theres nothing on earth capable of moving like that", that does not prove anything. So I am interested in hearing people's opinions on why they are convinced that they were ET's.

Is it popular culture that has created this thinking? I think so. It really does seem people are to quick to associate these things with something so "out there" they miss the important point that more than likely the're of this earth.

Now I'm not saying everyone thinks this way but there are alot who do have an auto association issue when it comes to this . Even when looking at the abduction topic people automatically say the're ET's.

Now I'm going to avoid touching on what I know for now and I believe I have chosen my words carefully for this one (For those who know what I mean) but I wanted to bring this up.

Now you may say "You don't know what you're talking about" or "Your ignorant" but can we please avoid that one for the moment and stick to the topic which is "UFO/USO Does Not Mean ET" (unidentified objects are ET's).

Now I would also like to add I have researched this topic. For many years I have been a believer until recently when my opinion was changed.

Anyone who is disrespectful will be gone. I would appreciate peoples opinions on what they have witnessed first hand not from video or photos. With their own eyes.

Thank you











[edit on 19-6-2010 by hornum]




posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   
what about uso's do they fit in here to? oh and what about this?




posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by metalholic
 


Yes I am familiar with buzz's Apollo 11 comments but Buzz himself has confirmed that what he saw was not Unidentified and that it was four detached spacecraft adapter panels. I am also aware of what Buzz said about a monolith on Phobos. Is that what you are refering to?

Good point USO's do fit in yes. Just edited. Thanks




[edit on 18-6-2010 by hornum]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:53 PM
link   
Well, at least now you're being a bit more conservative in your statements. Whether UFOs are really extraterrestrial craft, I wouldn't imagine to know. Whatever the actual case, it's a phenomenon that needs significant investigation.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kojiro
Well, at least now you're being a bit more conservative in your statements. Whether UFOs are really extraterrestrial craft, I wouldn't imagine to know. Whatever the actual case, it's a phenomenon that needs significant investigation.
Have you witnessed a UFO or USO?



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:00 PM
link   
reply to post by hornum
 


but ofcourse without a nod from the gov. no one that knows if there is one that knows would never come out and say yes aliens exist i got the nod from secret intelligences or w/e the case would be



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by hornum
 


but ofcourse without a nod from the gov. no one that knows if there is one that knows would never come out and say yes aliens exist i got the nod from secret intelligences or w/e the case would be


I don't quite understand your answer. Are you saying that anyone attached to the Govt. would not come out and claim they have seen a UFO/USO ET?



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:04 PM
link   
well if it was detached spacecraft adapter panels,
wouldn't it mean the panels would be rotating
or tumbling in space with no guidance or propulsion.
That UFO in that footage was moving without
tumbling or revolving, means intelligent
control. just 2 pence



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
well if it was detached spacecraft adapter panels,
wouldn't it mean the panels would be rotating
or tumbling in space with no guidance or propulsion.
That UFO in that footage was moving without
tumbling or revolving, means intelligent
control. just 2 pence



Is there a video of this object not tumbling? I think you will find the video they used in the documentary is of a later mission.

[edit on 18-6-2010 by hornum]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by hornum
 


its not a part of there spaceship for one if it was they would have known the astronauts chosen to do them sorts of missions are geniuses in there own rights able to mathematically figure # out

and also think things through they are trained to be as cool as can be under pressure as one slip up would have u killed or tumbling through space...what really happened here was they were visited by aliens while up there when brought back told to never mention it

ofcourse buzz couldnt keep his mouth shut so he had to go back and fix his mistakes the gov. can do # like that think about the tight lid kept on the philadelphia experiment, the battle in la, and the foo fighters of ww2



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by hornum

Originally posted by Kojiro
Well, at least now you're being a bit more conservative in your statements. Whether UFOs are really extraterrestrial craft, I wouldn't imagine to know. Whatever the actual case, it's a phenomenon that needs significant investigation.
Have you witnessed a UFO or USO?


I saw something that can only be termed as a "probe." It had an array of white, yellow, and red lights, produced an odd, high pitch beeping noise, and was about a meter in length. It moved directly past a window outside my previous apartment in what can be termed as my "back yard." The parking lot and road were on the OTHER side of the apartment while on the unidentified object's end were trees and overgrowth.

I frankly don't know what it was and it only happened once.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by hornum
 


1.its not a part of there spaceship for one if it was they would have known the astronauts chosen to do them sorts of missions are geniuses in there own rights able to mathematically figure # out

2.and also think things through they are trained to be as cool as can be under pressure as one slip up would have u killed or tumbling through space...what really happened here was they were visited by aliens while up there when brought back told to never mention it

3.ofcourse buzz couldnt keep his mouth shut so he had to go back and fix his mistakes the gov. can do # like that think about the tight lid kept on the philadelphia experiment, the battle in la, and the foo fighters of ww2


1.Not at all they are human and they did not put two and two together. Their S-IVB upper stage was 6,000 miles away, but the four panels were jettisoned before the S-IVB made its separation maneuver so they would closely follow the Apollo 11 spacecraft until its first midcourse correction.

2.Not true, the documentary cut the crew's conclusion that they were probably seeing one of four detached spacecraft adapter panels.

3.I wont get into the Phil Exp. have you ever been interviewd for a documentary. The Documentary posted was from 2005 and the makers edited it to sound like it was a UFO when actually he explained to them it wasn't. You said " think things through they trained to be as cool as can be under pressure" would this statement also apply to his interview?

[edit on 18-6-2010 by hornum]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kojiro

Originally posted by hornum

Originally posted by Kojiro
Well, at least now you're being a bit more conservative in your statements. Whether UFOs are really extraterrestrial craft, I wouldn't imagine to know. Whatever the actual case, it's a phenomenon that needs significant investigation.
Have you witnessed a UFO or USO?


I saw something that can only be termed as a "probe." It had an array of white, yellow, and red lights, produced an odd, high pitch beeping noise, and was about a meter in length. It moved directly past a window outside my previous apartment in what can be termed as my "back yard." The parking lot and road were on the OTHER side of the apartment while on the unidentified object's end were trees and overgrowth.

I frankly don't know what it was and it only happened once.


So you believe it was an ET? Why can it only be termed as a "Probe"?

[edit on 18-6-2010 by hornum]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by hornum

Originally posted by Kojiro

Originally posted by hornum

Originally posted by Kojiro
Well, at least now you're being a bit more conservative in your statements. Whether UFOs are really extraterrestrial craft, I wouldn't imagine to know. Whatever the actual case, it's a phenomenon that needs significant investigation.
Have you witnessed a UFO or USO?


I saw something that can only be termed as a "probe." It had an array of white, yellow, and red lights, produced an odd, high pitch beeping noise, and was about a meter in length. It moved directly past a window outside my previous apartment in what can be termed as my "back yard." The parking lot and road were on the OTHER side of the apartment while on the unidentified object's end were trees and overgrowth.

I frankly don't know what it was and it only happened once.


So you believe it was an ET?


The possibility crossed my mind. It was some kind of machine, but I doubt it was large enough to have had a pilot.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Kojiro
 


Do you think it could have been manufactured here on earth?



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:49 PM
link   
reply to post by hornum
 


the philadelphia exp wasnt nothin about ufo's rather a battleship!



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:49 PM
link   
reply to post by hornum
 


It's a possibility. I'm not discounting anything.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by hornum
 


the philadelphia exp wasnt nothin about ufo's rather a battleship!


I am aware of that, thank you. Just to add a few things to that are you familiar with German Vril/Haunebu of WWII? Worth taking a look.

[edit on 18-6-2010 by hornum]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Kojiro
 


you should ask him if he can prove it was manufactured here on earth...see the thing is this is all moot points for one he cant prove it was created here we cant prove it wasnt...so all in all what is the point?



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by metalholic
reply to post by Kojiro
 


you should ask him if he can prove it was manufactured here on earth...see the thing is this is all moot points for one he cant prove it was created here we cant prove it wasnt...so all in all what is the point?


The point is there are often logical answers for things and I'm really interested in discussing this with people who believe what they have seen is ET/UFO, in an effort to find out why they have come to that conclusion. I should add, I appreciate his input but I am after something a little bit more tangible.




[edit on 19-6-2010 by hornum]




top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join