It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

KILL-SWITCH must be given to OBAMA

page: 10
7
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 06:24 PM
link   
No one should have a kill switch. Wouldn't that only cause more speculation & rumors as to what is going on? These shores belong to all of us, & the Gulf is under siege. 1984 came to mind when I saw your post.
kno22




posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 06:45 PM
link   
This fool, under his normal ATS account, probably couldn't make a thread that got any replies to save his life. But he makes another account, and starts obviously posting crap just to get a rise out of you people.

Now he has a thread with 180 replies, and counting. It's even under the popular topics page.

Good job ATS!

Please don't flag this thread and give this sad little man anymore attention.

Edit: And don't call him a "dis-info agent". It probably gets his jollies off when someone does that.

You sad puke...you're the kind of person that has brought decline to the content of ATS.

[edit on 19-6-2010 by susp3kt]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Y2Zgt
We need to give Barack Obama the internet Killswitch.I have encountered many psychopaths on the internet. If a huge emergency happens there will be many people spreading dis info on websites like this. Lets say for example new york city was to get nuked or something awful, you would have people on this website trying to say that it is a false flag, probably the same people saying that 9/11 was. That is not good in a time of chaos. Sometimes the internet rumors get out of hand and in a national emergency we would all need to work together, not conjure up lies on the internet.

Am I the only person on this website that agrees with the killswitch??



Not to mention it will prevent from being attacked if the enemy has their weapons hooked up with the internet.




Here is a link to the article
perezhilton.com...

[edit on 19-6-2010 by Y2Zgt]




[edit on 19-6-2010 by Y2Zgt]

[edit on 19-6-2010 by Y2Zgt]



For once, me and the screamin queen of papparazzi agree. This is crap!

You can sign your rights over goofball,
keep your freakin hands off of mine!


[edit on 19/6/10 by felonius]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 06:59 PM
link   
There are too many people to reply to. But I will try to answer alot of your questions with this reply.

The "kill switch" will shut down USA servers and such, so therefore it is not global jurisdiction.

The internet is a privilege not a right. You can have this privilege taken away if you get caught hacking and such.

People use a the internet as a medium for expressing their free speech. There internet itself is not frees speech.

The kill switch will not shut it down forever, just in a time of a national emergency.


You people need to wake up to the truth and stop believing in what the majority of people say.

The kill switch could save our-lives in the near future.

I'm glad to see that a couple people on here agree with me.

I will try to make another post answering others questions!



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Whine Flu

Originally posted by Y2Zgt

Here is a link to the article
perezhilton.com...



lol



Why you trying to discredit my news source? It's not "mainstream media", wow people on this website are really hypocritical.

Why don't you agree with the kill switch???



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:02 PM
link   
Internet Kill Switch is the number 2 (pun?) searched item on Yahoo right now.

Lets say Obama was given the authority to kill the internet when ever, is there any other way to connect if that happens?

[edit on 19-6-2010 by earth2]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by earth2
Internet Kill Switch is the number 2 searched item on Yahoo right now.

Lets say Obama was given the authority to kill the internet when ever, is there any other way to connect if that happens?


yes for sure, talking to people, books, magazines, newspapers, telephones, There was life before the internet.

Again this will not shut it down forever, just in a time of national emergencY!!

"Give Obama The Switch Don't Be A B%tch!"



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


Sorry, let me rephrase.

Is there any other way to connect to the internet if the internet is switched off.

[edit on 19-6-2010 by earth2]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by earth2
 


Oh with the switch? It is probably a possibility but with an emergency of the caliber of using the switch, I'm sure the internet would be the least of your worries.

Seriously, think about this from an on biased view, don't just listen to what the majority of people are saying think about all the lives the switch would/will save.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


Who say's the internet is a privilege and not a right? All rights are self evident, and if they are self evident, no one needs a silly little clown telling them what their rights are, or are not. All rights are those that cause no harm, outside of defense of life, liberty and property. Who gets harmed by people using the internet? This has been your big claim, that there are "crazies" on the internet, but who are they harming? For as crazy as you are, who are you harming? You post your opinions in this thread by right, just as everyone else does. Of course, this is a privately owned site, and we all run the risk of loosing posting privileges, but in spite of that we post our opinions by right anyway, and for those who get banned, it is safe to assume they find haven in some other site, where they continue to post their opinions by right. So, I ask you again, who say's the internet is a privilege and not a right?



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
 


Alot of people get harmed using the internet. It cause severe psychological damages on some individuals. Gets people to believe in total lies. It can also be used for many forms of cyber terrorism.

Not only do we need a switch but I think we also need some sort of a form of internet "police" or security to protect us from such terrorist.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


I'm not listening to the majority, I'm just asking a simple question.
If you don't have an answer that's cool. Maybe someone else does.

Is there any other way to connect to the internet if Obama was to flip the kill Switch?



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Y2Zgt


Alot of people get harmed using the internet. It cause severe psychological damages on some individuals. Gets people to believe in total lies. It can also be used for many forms of cyber terrorism.

Not only do we need a switch but I think we also need some sort of a form of internet "police" or security to protect us from such terrorist.


mostly those ppl were psychological damaged before they used the internet.
how does an internet make anyone believe anything?

get some help would ya...


[edit on 19-6-2010 by Zeta Reticulan]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 07:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Y2Zgt
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
 


Alot of people get harmed using the internet. It cause severe psychological damages on some individuals. Gets people to believe in total lies. It can also be used for many forms of cyber terrorism.

Not only do we need a switch but I think we also need some sort of a form of internet "police" or security to protect us from such terrorist.


The burden of proof lies with you. If someone has been harmed due to the internet then there is a victim. Show me the victim. "A lot of people get harmed...causes severe psychological blah, blah, blah", will not work in a court of law. If you are to make a case for government authority it must be rooted in law, not opinion.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by earth2
 


Actually the answer to that is yes. There are alternative internet technologies and already there are people looking at implementing them. One which would work, at least in urban areas, is the WiFi internet. It uses a different addressing protocol and does not require centralised servers or satellites. It also does not require the fibre optic backbone and basically it is a huge p2p network. It does not require the use of the A-Servers.

It really is something worth taking a look at as it cannot be shut down unless of course they are going to attempt to jam all WiFi installations in the whole country.

This OP has to be a DIA and I would suggest that if he is a gubbermint agent that everyone putting him on ignore would effectively silence him.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


I think we need a kill-switch for posts like yours and people like you.

People like you are the reason these events take place. People like you are the reason the world is the way it is.

People like you are the reason websites like this exist - because us intelligent grown ups need a little time from the children every now and then.

I advise you to shut off your computer now... the psychopaths are coming to get you.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 10:16 PM
link   
If an oversight authority starts monitoring and regulating the internet, then all the discussion on any "alternate" internet forums would no longer be that "alternate" in nature.

How about some resemblance between reality and the following piece of "art"?

www.telegraph.co.uk...

[edit on 19-6-2010 by order in chaos]



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 10:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


Is it just me, or are the dis-info getting stupider by the minute...thanks for the warning something big is going to happen in the next few years...but I was already aware of that...


I think that next few years is bit longer in time duration. If we observe the pattern of MSM reporting and the scare tactics that are going on lately, I think TPTB would try to push their agenda quickly.



posted on Jun, 19 2010 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Y2Zgt
 


The EXACT same thing could happen with talking people in person. Maybe my next door neighbor doesn't believe that something is real or spreads dis-info? So lets give Obama the kill switch to shut people up? Lets give Obama the kill switch to shut down amateur and business radio? Lets give Obama the kill switch to shut down T.V.? Lets give Obama the kill switch to shut down businesses? That is not how our country works - sorry. Giving one man the power to do something this massive is ALWAYS a HORRIBLE idea.

[edit on 19-6-2010 by Jibblin]



posted on Jun, 20 2010 @ 12:44 AM
link   
Now, let me let a few people who have posted to this thread aware of one simple fact that's been said at least a half dozen times in the first 3 pages to this thread alone :

Anyone suggesting, hinting, phishing to either engage, perform, act upon the assassination of The President Of The United States Of America be advised that according to United States Federal Law must be reported immediately by the staff of The Above Network, LLC to report all posters to The United States Secret Service.

This is for those who are insisting that The President Of The United States have a killswitch as well as those implying that the POTUS be assassinated or have a killswitch attached to him or to any human being for that matter.

To the OP :

Come out of hiding and reveal yourself and who you are working for. If you don't go away and leave this site please. Typically I am not ever for trying to run someone off of a website as Freedom Of Speech may apply but in reality in the world of the information superhighway follows the time honoured tradition of network neutrality.

All,

That means even though no law can ever be passed dictating internet usage the law is that for The United States Federal Government to not be knocking down your websites front door the staff of any site are allowed to dictate policy and establish, adopt and enforce a Terms Of Service that acts as them self-policing themselves instead of giving law enforcement a reason to step in. You do not want Govt on your site or having to force a site owner to dictate terms to the site owner. Freedom Of Speech in the world wide web has no legal bearing.

One must compose themselves in a correct, intelligent and adult manner in order to remain a member of a website and be expected to maintain a certain Code Of Conduct while on that site.

Beyond that Govt can however mandate that certain segments of our population be restricted or be prohibited and banned from internet usage due to certain items that make them a threat the health and safety of the population. Hence how sex offenders are banned from the internet.

No one is allowed to threaten someone else with physical harm over the internet. If you threaten someone else's life, family, community expect reprecussions and possibly a knock at your front door courtesy of your local law enforcement. What typically 95% or greater of the people on the website would consider applicable in the real world applies on the internet. The same way you conduct yourself in a restaurant, shopping centre, bar, movie theatre you are to conduct yourself the same exact way on the web without modification or alteration. Plus let's not also forget that on this site we the 13,620 are considered to be guests of Bill ATS ID : Skeptic Overload as this is his house we are all in. Think of it that way. Conduct yourself in the manner you would want someone else to conduct themselves while they are in your home.

[edit on 20-6-2010 by TheImmaculateD1]

[edit on 20-6-2010 by TheImmaculateD1]




top topics



 
7
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join