It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bravo111
The False pos and false neg approach attempts to shut down and dismiss that which is the non-physical element of life, and instead explain it away as the bogey monster and a figment of ones vivid imagination.
It is simply not that black and white. The gray area is the overlap between the physical and non-physical that needs to be bridged by science, amongst many other disciplines.
Originally posted by Logarock
Cause us to believe? It has never been established that such things are simply a matter of perception.
All this guy has done is to demonstrate that perception can be subjective..but he has still done so within limits and has controled and restricted the examples ect and most of that simply optical.
Originally posted by 547000
What if pattern-detecting has nothing to do with why people believe in such things? That they come to their conclusions based on actual experience and not some abstract reasoning as to why they believe based on seeing patterns? Does that make them liars or deluded?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Logarock
Cause us to believe? It has never been established that such things are simply a matter of perception.
All this guy has done is to demonstrate that perception can be subjective..but he has still done so within limits and has controled and restricted the examples ect and most of that simply optical.
And actually, it has been established that at least some of these things are indeed a matter of perception (NDE's, OOBE's, sleep paralysis, etc). There are several videos online I can dig up if necessary.
More importantly, nobody has established that ghosts, aliens deities, etc actually exist. I'm not saying they aren't real but there's much pointing in the way that these things are indeed byproducts of the errors of perception.
Originally posted by Bravo111
I am stating that all sciences contribute towards the final answers - not one single science can lead the way - it is absolute arrogance to presume otherwise and leads to a reductive religion of science that ultimately does not lend any real understanding to the true nature of the universe, physical or otherwise.
As for the non-physical - I mean all of that which exists in the ether or the multi-verse that is not physical and has yet to be determined and understood.
Originally posted by Logarock
they ended up firing their lead reasercher becouse he concluded that such things were not a matter of perception.....
My point here is that I perceive that submitting "proof" in this field of hard skeptics
Originally posted by 547000
How do you prove something non-physical in a field which, by its nature, can only consider the physical? I agree with the other poster: it's like submitting to the inquisition.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by 547000
How do you prove something non-physical in a field which, by its nature, can only consider the physical? I agree with the other poster: it's like submitting to the inquisition.
Well, apparently that non-physical thing caused some perturbation of the physical, else we'd not be able to detect it. One must be able to balance the equation. Providing proof of your claim or assertion is not "submitting to the inquisition". It's the nature of the scientific process. I'm sure the referenced researcher knew this.
Originally posted by Bravo111
"how many times have you thought of an individual and then a moment later they call you"?
Originally posted by Logarock
Anyway this guy was one of the worlds leading authorities in this field and he says yes....there are things and forces that work without any way for science to understand how.
Originally posted by andy1033
But they absolutely tried to destroy my a-levels time with it, for no reason. So imagine what they are doing today, if that was 1992.
Originally posted by Bravo111
The onus is put upon the experiencer to prove, whereas I personally believe that the onus (in the case of the generic/mass supernatural experiences) should be upon science to discover and ultimately prove.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Bravo111
The onus is put upon the experiencer to prove, whereas I personally believe that the onus (in the case of the generic/mass supernatural experiences) should be upon science to discover and ultimately prove.
Science always sets out to explain anomalies such as the one we're referring to. However, such an event can easily be explained without invoking supernatural or mystical means. Remembering the hits and forgetting the misses is a common event in many branches of the "supernatural" including telepathics, psychics, astrologers, etc. Such explanations aren't very exciting though (like much of science), and those that claim a more exciting causation are called upon to verify their claims.
Originally posted by whaaa
Should the experiments at Duke with Dr. Rhine be dismissed?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Logarock
Anyway this guy was one of the worlds leading authorities in this field and he says yes....there are things and forces that work without any way for science to understand how.
So he says.
The thing is, anyone can produce a collection of anomalies and claim that they cannot be explained in any other way than the supernatural. That's not proper research or reasoning. "It must the the devil/god/aliens" is not an acceptable answer. Also, claiming that "there's no way science can understand it" is an insulator against all due challenge. This researcher was justly dismissed.
This researcher was justly dismissed.
Also, claiming that "there's no way science can understand it" is an insulator against all due challenge.