Tony Hayward cracks on cross examination, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:22 PM by loveguy
reply to post by HunkaHunka

Hello,

Here's something to coincide with what you're saying?

Found on this page: www.bp.com...

Major and high-potential incidents


We monitor and report on major incidents, such as those covering fatal accidents, significant property damage, or significant environmental impact.
All fatalities, other major incidents and many that had the potential to become major incidents are discussed by the group operations risk committee, chaired by the group chief executive. We undertake incident investigations to ensure we learn as much as possible and take action to prevent recurrence.

Is not this Tony (what's his bucket) the same chief executive?

I started a thread where I was just presenting what all the company's I had thought had their hands in this mess; each company's safety standards, as an indicator of each company's integrity, and/or lack thereof. In that thread, it was found more company's are in the loop, and should share the burden of responsibility.

Here's a link if anybody's interested; www.abovetopsecret.com...

Edit to bold emphasis

[edit on (6/17/1010 by loveguy]


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:27 PM by HunkaHunka
reply to post by darkelf



That's my question exactly.... The bp guy who forced the decision was in Houston at the time.... Another wsj article named him... I thin hie is Dave or Doug or something...



But HE is the one who should be right beside him answering questions as to why he went against the wishes of the transocean folks who were safety conscious....

I just don't get it....

But i bet someone will "get it" pretty soon...


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:28 PM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by darkelf



They dont want some poor working class guy to get the boot or even a middle class engineer type. They want some millionaire figurehead who has nothing to do with anything get the boot.



reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:34 PM by jonny2410
reply to post by kiwifoot



Star for you! I totally agree. Hayward is the scape-goat that the Obama administration needs to deflect attention away from their own failings. All the while those slimy politicians are trying to win points through this event as we saw today. It was embarrassing.


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:38 PM by kosmicjack
reply to post by HunkaHunka



Doug Suttles. Chief Operating Officer of BP Exploration and Production.

[edit on 17/6/2010 by kosmicjack]


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:39 PM by justwokeup
reply to post by Navieko



We need to separate two things:

a) The need to get to the bottom of the situation. Get the truth of exactly what occurred and what decisions were made by whom. So it isn't repeated. Thats what really matters.

b) The need for the politicians to express anger thus demonstrating solidarity with the american people. The need for ritual sacrifice of a villain.

Whats going on now will satisfy point b. Point a will only be satisfied by an accident investigation. The accident investigation should be an independent one run by a judge with the power to impound all corporate documentation pertinent to the case.

The hearing going on now will achieve nothing. Expecting an individual to prejudice an investigation before its been conducted; or to have conducted one in the middle of the crisis is not realistic.

I'm not defending him personally, or the company. He has been unimpressive, he should fall on his sword and i'd wager the company will be found wanting when the investigation occurs.

However, watching politicians line up to throw rocks is distasteful. If its about finding truth why did they spend an hour making sure each politician gets a chance to make a witty criticism before the testimony started....pure theatre.


reply posted on 17-6-2010 @ 12:40 PM by loveguy
reply to post by texSflood

Hello,

So, my post earned me "foe" status huh? Thanks for the compliment.

I thought we were discussing Tony (what's his bucket) here?

If you want to discuss Dicky's involvement past, and/or present with Halliburton, I'm sure if you post a new thread discussing such will get plenty of attention. I'll hope for an invitation from you to join that topic.

Oh, sorry. Have you achieved your first 20 posts to unlock your ability to open a new thread? I'll be here...Welcome aboard.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Oil and Tar Balls Litter the Gulf Coast After Hurricane Isaac
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
Did BP delay sealing the well so they could use it later?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Beach report - St. George Island, FL
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
Mass die offs still occurring?
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Yangtze river turns into tomato juice in China ( picture inside)
  Posted 4 days ago with 1 member flags