Originally posted by Argyll
Originally posted by Alethea
Isn't it a little too convenient that this article suddenly comes out now?
I think we need to STOP accepting every article at face value and really scrutinize these "news stories".
This story seems to be circulating and it's origins appear dubious. Also the story does not show a by-line of it's author!
There is too much missing information to accept this story as credible. The links to NY Times all show "page not found."
I think we need to investigate the journalists who are involved in this propaganda as well as the source supposedly "publishing" these sudden news
Are you saying there is no oil leak in Nigeria?..........It's not "convenient" ....it's relevant!
You are absolutely putting words in my mouth. However, if you read the post above mine, written by ANNED, you will see that her research discredits
the article as well and her info has detail that shows how the author of that propaganda article has given a lot of misinformation. Whether the
journalist is misleading others deliberately and the untruths are intentional, I don't know.
I am saying that "An Agenda" is being promoted here with all of this sudden publicity and it's intentions are to sway the masses.
I am saying that we really need to VALIDATE the sources and CREDENTIALS of the information we accept. Look beyond the story being presented and ask
"who" has a vested interest in promoting the information.
Also, I would suggest that people read and consider the comments of others before giving a knee-jerk response to the OP. Sometimes, we need to
research the information in these articles for bias and untruths. There are also journalists and publications who are not only members of secret
societies, but also some who have been "bought out" to do the bidding of various corporations.
Articles presented may "appear" to be "on the side of the little people and the common man"....and many are deceived in believing that they are
speaking for the masses. This is how politicians have always been elected---by how well their platform can identify them with the masses. It's an old
parlor trick and people still cannot seem to see through it.
What you are seeing is the Hegelian dialect in motion. A catalyst is used to set people in motion and then the masses are taken by the hand and
directed toward the resolution which has already been decided.
Do we need an alternative energy source? Yes. Has a cleaner energy source always been available? Yes. Have these things been supressed and silenced in
the past? Yes.
So why the change now...when other energy sources could have been made available all along?
There is still a man behind the curtain.
The corporate institution of religious alliances have all the wealth and power. Religions own the schools and the universities. They own the
hospitals. They own the large corporations through their stock portfolios. Religions direct governments and buy politicians. Religions institute the
When the masses are sufficiently angry with corporate rape of the globe and fed up with lame governments, then guess who will step up to the plate to
be the Savior of the World? The very one who has been behind the destruction will now get a new face. Think Stockholm Syndrome.
If you do a little research, you will find that Religion is behind the Green Movement. It will appear to be a good thing. All will be fixed. A
thousand years of peace to come and a big clean up. Religion has to change it's mission because the lies and the control have been falling apart and
it has reached a tipping point where religion has lost it's control over people. Too many have seen the sham.
But what the masses are not seeing yet, is that there is a plan in place to restore the control of corporate religion. The masses are being guided to
the Green Pastures.
Dig deeper to scrutinize the information you receive. Ask yourself "who has a vested interest" in promoting the information? Why are you being
bombarded with information that focuses on certain corporations or individuals---is it a distraction so you won't see what is in the other hand
coming in to play? Is it so you will think YOU decided the resolution for yourself?
I would be very leery of an article promoted as "factual investigative journalism" that does not have an author's by-line. Also, if something of
this magnitude were true, it would not consistently come up "page not found". And furthermore, we need to check the credentials of both the writers
and publications to find out whose "pocket" they are in. Many who are in the limelight did not get there by being honest and unbiased.