Look I agree Faal is totally unreliable but that does not mean 100% of what the person says is fake.
You have to be able to distinguish in between totally absurd and totally possible. Although this can be extremely difficult often times, this is
But I never automatically dismiss something because it comes from a known hoaxer-liar.
I know to question it deeply though.
We know as a FACT the MSM lies to us purposely, example the lead up to the Iraq war and the lies and propaganda from that.
But people still treat the MSM as a perfect source. Which is ILLOGICAL.
Every source is Questionable. Every source must be investigated further. Claims must be investigated.
Without any investigation, only a FOOL would automatically dismiss something because it comes from a source they don't like.
They are not smart, they are sheep who follow the herd mentality.
People who think for themselves know better, and they will treat every claim individually and seek further verification to determine it's veracity.
To me, Faal is no better than the MSM, and vice versa. They are both known liars.
But I still investigate their claims.
This is because I am a truth seeker. And I know that truth can be found anywhere, even in the most unlikely places of all.
Use Discretion. Question everything.
Follow the trail.
Hope this answers your question loosely.