What Do The Sears Tower; WTC, and Terror Drills Have In Common?

Originally posted by Shadow Herder

What would you say then? Any half wit can see....

And that is what you see, correct?

reply to post by trebor451


Your half quote shows us your true lack of intelligence and knowledge pertaining to anything really.

Grow up and educate yourself a little bit before adding your 1 cent.

Remember that on September 11, 2001, NORAD was conducting a war games drill that simulated planes flying into towers. There is at the very least, a very eerie correlation with the upcoming terror drills that will be conducted in Chicago from June 13 through June 17. This terror drill is slated to be a full scale event carried out over a five day period and will include a simulated airplane crash, terror attack, and the release of a bio weapon.

reply to post by Shadow Herder


This is patently false, and amounts to nothing more than a "guess", or an "opinion"....

Remember that on September 11, 2001, NORAD was conducting a war games drill that simulated planes flying into towers.

....repeating of unsubstantiated nonsense does not make it "true".

I see a habitually obvious pattern of stating something with no backing.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Shadow Herder

 

Remember that on September 11, 2001, NORAD was conducting a war games drill that simulated planes flying into towers.

I see a habitually obvious pattern of stating something with no backing.

...repeating of unsubstantiated nonsense does not make the truth "false".

[edit on 22-6-2010 by Shadow Herder]

reply to post by Shadow Herder


Typical dodge, and weave...with no backing or proof.

YOUR task is to prove, by backign up your statement. You don't, because you can't. SO, deflect, ignore and change the subject, that is the M.O.

You either show proof that those NORAD drills were being conducted, on that day, as you claimed, or you retract the statement --- or, more properly, clarify it as your opinion.

It is that simple. Proof to back up what you post, or else it is not a fact, it is a thought only.

reply to post by weedwhacker


You have failed in just about every post that you offered. You have failed to disprove the facts and have failed to uphold the official story. You have failed to disprove this thread. Give up, most people have you ignore anyways.

reply to post by Shadow Herder


Then, I must merely repeat the challenge, for all to see...you are not addressing the issue, still. Why not?

Originally posted by weedwhacker
YOUR task is to prove, by backign up your statement. You don't, because you can't. SO, deflect, ignore and change the subject, that is the M.O.

You either show proof that those NORAD drills were being conducted, on that day, as you claimed, or you retract the statement --- or, more properly, clarify it as your opinion.

Not that difficult. Step up, show proof.

OR, you can (like others who can't handle the REAL truth) can just 'ignore', and continue living in a delusion. The credibility offered will then be judged by the readers. The readers who ARE 'denying ignorance'.

reply to post by weedwhacker


Understand that the internet is littered with trolls and bad guys who are employed or willfully ignorant to argue any discussion which discusses the truth and any discussion concerning 911. These people pose as truthers or pseudo intellects and hang out in these forums all day long attempting to squelch any intelligent discussion.

These people more often than not do not provide sources or proof to their ridiculous attempts to uphold the official narrative concerning 911 which has been debunked years ago by professionals in many fields.

reply to post by Shadow Herder


Exactly...hold up a mirror so you can revisit your words, for they apply directly on you:

Understand that the internet is littered with trolls and bad guys who are employed or willfully ignorant to argue any discussion which discusses the truth and any discussion concerning 911. These people pose as truthers or pseudo intellects and hang out in these forums all day long attempting to squelch any intelligent discussion.

I'm suggesting that you litter here with innuendo, and unsubstantiated claims.

Further, it is evident that you fall into the category underlined above...a "truther", and not a 'pseudo intellect'.

Now, third time, you made a claim, and when asked, continued to dodge/not answer and NOT supply a source to document/back up your claim. Dishonesty, or lack of proof to that claim? (Lack of proof makes the "claim" either hearsay, or 'opinion'...).

THIRD time:

Originally posted by weedwhacker
YOUR task is to prove, by backign up your statement. You don't, because you can't. SO, deflect, ignore and change the subject, that is the M.O.

You either show proof that those NORAD drills were being conducted, on that day, as you claimed, or you retract the statement --- or, more properly, clarify it as your opinion.

[edit on 23 June 2010 by weedwhacker]