It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Zecharia Sitchin says he's willing to stake everything he's written

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Elieser
 
I've read most or all of Mr. Stichin's books, starting with The 12th Planet to The Lost Book of Enki and The End of Days. I've also read many other books concerning this subject. I will here state my opinions. The Annunaki were the Nephilum who also were the Gods of mythology. In the Christian Bible, when it states that "Cain dwelt eastward in the land of Nod" after the killing of his brother Abel, this land was a settlement of these superhumans, around the area northeast of Kuwait at the head of the Persian Gulf. Mr Stichin says that humans were created by these Annunaki 200,000 years ago. which in The Urantia Book is also the time of Lucifer's rebellion. The planet Nibiru is one of three planets with a retrograde orbit that came into our solar system a few billion years ago due to an intense gravity exchange with another solar system which dislodged the three planets. NASA has already acknowledged the planet Sedna and I hear of another planet called Eris, which some say is actually Nibiru. In the Christian Bible in the Book of Revelation chapter 9 speaks of someone called Abaddon/ Apollyon or Apollo in Greek, Utu of the Nibiruans, Shamash of the Sumerians, Helios of the Romans, and Rama of the Hindus.




posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 

yes I did miss the link because I am talking about the megaliths under the roman construction as it says in the link i posted

I missed the link about the stone in the quarry because i wasn't refering to it and didnt link correctly, so I did start the confusion in that regard

so the stones underneath are the ones sitchin mentioned in his book and the ones I have so sloppily delt with on this thread and the ones mentioned in the link i posted

the stone you are refering to was expected to be moved at the time so they would have had some way to move it

the ones I am refering to have yet to be explained

from you link:
"No one knows how such a massive stone block was cut so precisely or how it was supposed to be moved. "

so I am going to apologize for sloppy work
but also point out the stones under the templa are still the main point

sorry



[edit on 16-6-2010 by Danbones]



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 08:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Danbones
the ones I am refering to have yet to be explained

from you link:
"No one knows how such a massive stone block was cut so precisely or how it was supposed to be moved. "


We may not precisely know how the stones were moved, but we know the ancients were more than capable of such feats. Even if it were completely unknown and unexplained how such stones were moved that is all it means, unexplained. It does not mean it was impossible or that advanced technology was involved or that aliens were responsible.



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 08:49 PM
link   
In the course of time much knowledge is gained, but much is also lost.

We may not know how to move such huge blocks today, but that's probably because we haven't needed to for thousands of years. We simply "forgot" how.

[edit on 16-6-2010 by FOXMULDER147]



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 08:56 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


yes I do agree that aliens are not an automatic conclusion
that is why I have recommended multiple sources
though I think that they have not been excluded either

just showing that there was advanced sources of knowledge alone
has been a tough enough battle let alone what those sources were



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 09:16 PM
link   
How can he stake his work, when he has already reaped the profits from it?

It really is an empty claim.

[edit on 2010/6/16 by SteveR]



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 10:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Elieser
 


How did this thread go from proposed DNA testing to prove ZS right or wrong to moving 2000 ton stones?
We all know ZS is not the best source to quote for any type of research, but he does bring up some interesting theories, verifiable or not.
Such as this as a possible reason for the start of plate tectonics and the formation of the Asteroid Belt:
transporter.blog.friendster.com...
www.paranoiamagazine.com...



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Romans 10:9

Originally posted by Phage

Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by metalholic
 


we can not move a two hundred ton stone today
period


Would you care to rephrase that? Period?
www.traderscity.com...
www.nmtcranes.co.uk...


Machines don't count you say? OK.


[edit on 6/15/2010 by Phage]


Hehe, i love bustin out that guy when the ancient alien lovers use big stones as their arguments.
It usually shuts them up.


um excuse me what?

back then MSS dictates we had nothing but pulleys and rope. Nice try though. I guess that will shut you up?



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex

Originally posted by dragnet53
So explain the cone head skulls found? Yes, there is a practice that forces the skulls that way. But the cone head skulls are actual skulls.


Yes, artificial cranial deformation was practiced by various cultures worldwide. The skull was bound soon after birth, before the sutures fused, forcing the skull to form into the desired shape. After the sutures fused, the skull would permanently be that shape. Nothing paranormal about it. The methods employed are well known and still used today for medical reasons.

If you think they are aliens, provide evidence.


If I provided evidence, then you will form some BS from out of no where just to prove a point. Just wait for ZS evidence and we shall see.



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 11:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by dragnet53
If I provided evidence, then you will form some BS from out of no where just to prove a point. Just wait for ZS evidence and we shall see.


Please, show me where I am wrong. Do you deny cultures around the world have used artificial cranial deformation to shape skulls?



posted on Jun, 16 2010 @ 11:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
How did this thread go from proposed DNA testing to prove ZS right or wrong
to moving 2000 ton stones?


That is usually how threads go in this forum. We start off with a very specific topic then some believers with throw ufological spaghetti against the wall, hoping something sticks.



posted on Jun, 17 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by metalholic
 


Sitchin mentions a site that has a 200 ton stone
as do other authors
the site exists
period

we can not move a two hundred ton stone today
period

You're a little quick with your punctuation
period

which is funny because the only punctuation you include is actually spelled out.

Anyway:


Products
Mammoet lifts with Liebherr
Published: 16/10/2008
23 views
MAMMOET is using a 600t capacityLiebherr crane for work on a project in Den Haag, Netherlands.

The company says it is the LR 1600/2’s first job out of the factory. The unit is being used to help lift a 540t load of steel onto an existing hotel.


That's smaller than many other cranes to be found out there.

Please note also, the 200 ton stone you're talking about (I assume you're talking about Baalbek - which Sitchen claims is a launch pad for alien rockets) did not have to be actually lifted off the ground. The quarry is nearby and uphill.



Originally posted by Totalstranger
I hope he has the cojones to admit he is wrong then. but that would be a first because no one who makes these kind of claims ever admits to being wrong


Graham Hancock has admitted that "Figerprints of the Gods" was "poorly researched."

He also admitted being wrong about the age of the Great Pyramid.

But with Sitchin, you are certainly right. The reason is that no DNA test can confirm or dispute his claim for the Anunnaki creating humans.

His thesis is that they created us from Homo Erectus. This person is obviously human. Sitchin claims the genetic manipulation happened a hundred thousand years ago (or maybe two - I can't remember and I wouldn't give his website a hit if you paid me.)

So, the entire idea of him "staking everything" he wrote on it is a con game itself.

In other words, this entire thread is an illustration of how Sitchin leads his followers around by their nose rings.

Harte



posted on Jun, 17 2010 @ 11:39 AM
link   
I can only assume that there is not much to talk about when it comes to the DNA testing of the ancient lizzard annunaki queen. I assume this only because the topic was abandoned on page one and has thus turned into another thread where people intoduce new topics to say "Ancient aliens are real what about ________" for the next ten pages.



posted on Jun, 17 2010 @ 11:41 AM
link   
I think there has been past civilisations, but i think zac is working for the ptb.



posted on Jun, 17 2010 @ 11:43 AM
link   
The fact Sitchin thinks these Sumerian is really an Anunaki means that a) the Anunaki are not retilians and b) the Anunaki, despite coming from a planet that pends most of it's time in the outer reaches of the solar system, have evolved to look in every way identical to humans.

I do like his idea though that if you're identical ti a human but come from a planet that takes 3,600 Earth years to orbit the sun then it means you live 3,600 times as long as an Earth human


As for them being incapable of design machinery to dig for gold and having to rely on ape men with antler picks and stone axes .....



posted on Jun, 17 2010 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by andy1033
I think there has been past civilisations, but i think zac is working for the ptb.


I think that the ptb were using electronic mind control on you at school in london in 1992.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 07:26 AM
link   
Some more stones...


The walls of pumapunku were made of solid interlocking mult-ton blocks of diurite, the hardest substance known besides diamond.

How were these monstrous stones moved and what was their purpose?



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 08:51 AM
link   
reply to post by metalholic
 


Hear hear! Box thinking is what got us into this mess in the first place. Follow the nice shepherd, he won't hurt you....I mean it right in your face sometimes, and people are still blind to it.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 08:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by KIZZZY
Some more stones...


The walls of pumapunku were made of solid interlocking mult-ton blocks of diurite, the hardest substance known besides diamond.

How were these monstrous stones moved and what was their purpose?


Simply leveraging techniques and massive manpower can move anything sir.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 10:27 AM
link   
I love the ancient astronaut theory but not the stones argument.

you gotta give humans more credit then we do, as that video shown that guy raising the blocks all by himself then stonehenge and maybe even the pyramids were much easier then expected, we just think so complex now that these simple methods were forgotten.

most of these techniques were highly guarded secrets, the Egyptians kept it secret, and people like the free masons did too, it was important stuff back then.


also with pumapunku, diorite is not the next hardest thing to diamond. From what I can gather it has a hardness of 7 at best, which means Topaz,Corundum,Emerald,Tungsten, and Cubic Zirconium and a few other things are also harder then it. There is also an Egyptian vase from about 3600 BC made of diorite/porphyry, as well as old mayan and incan walls and such....so they obviously knew how to work the stuff.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join