It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by abecedarian
Is a wild animal going to give YOU the right to a humane death?
So, it's mutual respect at work here, no?
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Its called instinct
We have the capability to think and to rationalise. An animal has a different brain structure, and instinct is more prevalent than thinking about consequence or rationalisation
So no, just because wild animals are aggresive doesnt mean we have more rights than them. Its not there fault, at least we have a chocie, some of us are just so low we choose the lesser moral path.
Originally posted by abecedarian
So simply because we have the ability to "think" that we should be more kind to them? You know for a fact that they can't "think" and "rationalize"? I might argue that since many animals will stop attacking when it becomes apparent they won't make the kill.
And I though that evolution says we are only more intelligent animals?
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
I think we should be kind to animals period. You sound like the kind of person that actually does harm animals
You seem to think its ok to torture and abuse them, simply because they would do different to us. And yes, its a known fact that they have cant rationalise. They rely almost entirely on instincts. Do yourself a favour and read a book, or research the brain mechanics of animals.
All your statements are based on assumptions
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
reply to post by abecedarian
Ok, hold up a minute
Im all for eating animals, what Im talking about is unnecessary torture and and cruelty. I thought you meant that, that was ok....I am also a carnivour (I dont eat dogs or anything else like that though)
Originally posted by wylekat
At the moment, we need to work on HUMAN rights, first- and get those fixed correctly- for once those are taken care of, sights like this would go by the wayside anyways. Poverty, food issues, cruelty would all disappear for the most part.
Originally posted by MissMegs
...
Remove all those that take more than they need and perhaps we could again.
But I doubt it...
MM
Originally posted by dl2one
...
Obviously alot of the 6.X billion mouths on this globe like to eat meat. Nothing wrong with that it's natural. What's not natural nor right is a disgusting overfilled corporate feed lot full of sentient animals made to suffer for fat bastard at McDix for 1.99, or someone tying up an animal to a vehicle and dragging it to death, or skinning live animals for cheap fur.
And how some of you equate an animal's natural instinct to kill for sustenance with how cruel humans can be is laughable in a sad way.
Bottom line is if it's a sentient animal with bloody nerve clusters as sophisticated as ours.... don't make me backhand you with my ring hand, j/k. Kill humanely for chrissakes.
Is a wild animal going to give YOU the right to a humane death?
So, it's mutual respect at work here, no?