Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
ATS Team:

It has come to my attention that many people on ATS have been picking on the Chemtrailers.

I think it is awful to see this minority group treated in this manner.

'minority group' ohh, thanks OP for giving me a good laugh.

S+F to you.



(I wish I had something witty to add to this thread but I don't)

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

GobbledokTChipeater.....

And.......

Therein lies the problem.

I've made a strong effort to add a sense of fun to this otherwise heav duty topic & yet again a Chemtrailer is getting hostile.

It's very sad, actually.....

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

LOL I'm not hostile. I don't get hostile. I simply suggest that we agree to disagree.

I have no need to defend myself and my beliefs, just to satisfy some people who seem to use questionable tactics to prove their point.

I agree to disagree

[edit on 14/6/10 by GobbledokTChipeater]

Originally posted by tappy

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
ATS Team:

It has come to my attention that many people on ATS have been picking on the Chemtrailers.

I think it is awful to see this minority group treated in this manner.

'minority group' ohh, thanks OP for giving me a good laugh.
S+F to you.
(I wish I had something witty to add to this thread but I don't)

Tappy.....

How good is this.....

..... we gettin' a few laughs in a chemtrail thread!!

And.....we've already got some great info!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Chadwickus

If you weren't defending a belief, why did you post those links?

You obviously cared enough to find and share these links in an attempt to defend this belief.

It's ok to say you're a chemtrailer, hell even Prince is one.

That guy is famous and all!

I should have said I can't be bothered defending myself. Defending a belief, I can deal with. I have to defend against:

Originally posted by GobbledokTChipeater

So far, in this thread, it has been suggested to have a "padded cell forum" for the "chemtrailers". We've had a nice picture of a person wearing a tinfoil hat. We've had a nice video of Prince, who apparently represents the chemtrail community , and chemtrails have been lumped with the ridiculous reptilian theory multiple times.

I don't think that is in the spirit of ATS and I kinda thought people were more grown up.

[edit on 14/6/10 by GobbledokTChipeater]

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Well if you're so clever, debunk Love Symbol!

In his earlier incarnation as a human he sang about Purple Rain ..... this is clearly a reference to a torrential downpour which shows up as purple on the radar - which proves he's really an undercover meteorologist haveing a laugh as the chemtrailers.....

And while you're at it, what about Keith Richards?

Keith Richards is actually Tutankhamen. Only a mummy can look that old and rock n roll!

[edit on 14-6-2010 by Essan]

And here we go again.

If it's been publicly acknowledge that 'some' of these formations (that AREN'T natural) are indeed CHAF ---sprayed by the military then how in the world can you sit there and say this is still a hoax?

This topic has been beaten to death and I don't understand why you go on these pro-chemtrail-hoax threads.

Whatever they're dropping/spraying is something relatively new to planet Earth. So do not say our skies are the same and chalk this off to being more air traffic. That's absurd!

I have to believe you're all paid or wanna-be dis-informant shills who say this so matter-of-factly and almost......on a weekly basis.


Here's a crash course kids:

*Those X-shaped trails coming out of 2 or more planes are not normal trails.
*The heavy duty thick trails flying around 40,000+ feet and lingers 15 minutes or so or until the wind takes it away, is not normal.
*And when your sky is turned into a gigantic lattice pattern, well.......do I even have to say it?

Chemtrails are real. What they're spraying is debatable . Probably a host of different chemicals at different times

Do not buy into this hoax-crap.
Please start to wonder why these people are so hellbent on bringing their drivel to our attention every week.

They don't believe, then fine. But why start these threads all the time? Do they really have that much time on their hands? Or.....are the being paid?

The average person usually says their piece (or starts a single thread) once...and moves on. Not these folks. (I smell dis-info)

Originally posted by GobbledokTChipeater
We've had a nice video of Prince, who apparently represents the chemtrail community

Is he any less credible than one of the thousands of faceless chemtrailers online? Who does represent the chemtrail community? Is there a pecking order we should know about?

I would suggest that given chemtrailers aren't a recognized working organization, that Prince obviously believes in them and has a public profile, he is just as good a representative of the chemtrailer community as anybody.... yes?

IRM

Originally posted by One Moment

Do not buy into this hoax-crap.
Please start to wonder why these people are so hellbent on bringing their drivel to our attention every week.

They don't believe, then fine. But why start these threads all the time? Do they really have that much time on their hands? Or.....are the being paid?

The average person usually says their piece (or starts a single thread) once...and moves on. Not these folks. (I smell dis-info)

Yes, there are some people who seemingly have a lot of motivation for apparently little gain. They use questionable tactics while saying they are doing for the good of the "chemtrailers".

Originally posted by One Moment

I have to believe you're all paid or wanna-be dis-informant shills who say this so matter-of-factly and almost......on a weekly basis.


Here's a crash course kids:

*Those X-shaped trails coming out of 2 or more planes are not normal trails.
*The heavy duty thick trails flying around 40,000+ feet and lingers 15 minutes or so or until the wind takes it away, is not normal.
*And when your sky is turned into a gigantic lattice pattern, well.......do I even have to say it?
Nope, we are people concerned about ignorance of rather common atmospheric phenomena.
As to your "crash course":
1) Planes leaving contrail in an "X" are planes leaving contrails flying in different directions.
2) We know a contrail is water as ice and exhaust fumes, like a cloud. Therefore they act like a cloud. Clouds can last for hours, therefore so can a contrail. It's the conditions in the atmoshpere alone.
3) A lattice pattern is a sure sign of a an air traffic corridor and air currents. Same as 1) above, just add some time for drift and additional planes.
Normal and expected.
This is not disinformation, it's simple facts, easy to find all over the internet and in books. Just look for the right thing. If you only research "chemtrails" you will never learn anything. Try researching contrails instead.

[edit on 14-6-2010 by stars15k]

Originally posted by InfaRedMan

Originally posted by GobbledokTChipeater
We've had a nice video of Prince, who apparently represents the chemtrail community

Is he any less credible than one of the thousands of faceless chemtrailers online? Who does represent the chemtrail community? Is there a pecking order we should know about?

I would suggest that given chemtrailers aren't a recognized working organization, that Prince obviously believes in them and has a public profile, he is just as good a representative of the chemtrailer community as anybody.... yes?

IRM

I don't need prince to represent me, thanks.

I cant beleive people are still using this chaff example to prove chemtrails.
For those of you who dont know, chaff was a world war 2 invention. Back then it was pretty basic, in that all it was was aluminium foil thrown out the back of an airplane. Now it is a bit more advanced but equally harmless. Most planes nowadays use a glass fibre chaff, which kinda looks like fuzzy transparent hair clippings. No you cant inhale it, no it wont make you ill and no it doesnt look anything like a "chemtrail". The military hardly ever use it anyway, as it only blocks radar based guidance systems. Most rockets nowadays use IR Tracking, Radar Tracking and Shape recognition devices to follow planes. Chaff will only distract the radar tracker, the other two will still guide the missile to its target.

What puzzles me perhaps more than the chemtrailers refusal to accept the mountains of data debunking the theory, is thier explanantion for why the government is spraying chemtrails. There are so many different theories and they are all absolutely bonkers.

Nice compilation of info.

Maybe..maybe not, with all due respect - I enjoy your posts and threads, you seem to be knowledgeable, friendly, good sense of humor, etc.

You have an extreme prejudice against anything chemtrail.

One cannot deny a few simple truths...Any engine burning fuel does have an exhaust releasing chemicals. And some of these chemicals are very bad for people. Airplanes' exhaust release chemicals, just like your car's tailpipe. Airplane exhaust leaves a "trail" in the sky when weather conditions are correct.

CHEMTRAILS exist Sir!

Are they purposefully loaded with extra stuff to kill us? Who knows?

But they ARE up there, I don't mean Maybe