It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A team of the British, American, and Hungarian astronomers have reported that the universe is crossed by at least 13 'Great Walls', apparent rivers of galaxies 100Mpc long in the surveyed domain of seven billion light years. They found galaxies clustered into bands spaced about 600 million light years apart that stretch across about one-fourth of the diameter of the universe, or about seven billion light years. This huge shell and void pattern would have required nearly 150 billion years to form, based on their speed of movement, if produced by the standard Big Bang cosmology.
Discovery of the Great Walls of galaxies and filamentary clumping of galactic mater has greatly upset the traditional notion that galactic matter should be uniformly distributed. If the universe began with a Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago, the awesome size of these large-scale structures is baffling because there is apparently not sufficient time available for such massive objects to form and to become organized.
Originally posted by mobiusmale
by the ever-expanding nature of the observable Universe)
Originally posted by BigfootNZ
To me, when you look at some of the images clumped and filament models of what the universe is supposed to look like on a huge scale... only one thing comes to mind for me...
Unimaginably large neurons.
I still think the idea that the universe is just part of some huge organism and we are just the quarks and leptons (or what ever they are made up of) variant on our scale has alot of merit or the universe is us, being viewed by ourselves from the inside at one of its smallest scales.
Regardless of what it might be... the Universe will continue defy our understanding in my opinion. I just dont see how it will ever truly be understood.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I personally believe that the Universe is infinite. It may as well be.
And IF I am right, than we will NEVER find our "beginnings" because there was no beginning. It just always was.
That is my assessment.
And I agree 100% with Ventian. We are just primitive apes and extremely ignorant.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
"Observable". This means there are things not observed.
Originally posted by pavil
Not that I am Stephen Hawking or anything close..... But isn't there a limit to what we can actually "see" of the universe? It seems 13.1 Billion is the limit so far. www.newscientist.com... tant-object-in-the-universe-spotted.html Before that, scientists theorize that the universe was just too "dark" and stars hadn't yet formed. I wonder if we can ever look back far enough to actually "see" the Big Bang, or what if we could see beyond that????