Originally posted by GeminiSky
Maybe...Maybe not, If you do not agree with this theory, you are entitled to your OPINION on the matter. But please refrain from stating your OPINIONS
as if they are FACT. It only leads to confusion for other members who take a genuine interest in discussing the topic at hand.
Thanks!!
GeminiSky
Maybe...Maybe Not is merely asking you--and other readers--to consider the source, one of the first and easier steps in any sort of rigorous analysis.
He further points out a weakness in this ET/Iraq theory by debunking the already oft-debunked video included in the first source.
There seem to be two audiences on this forum: one which enjoys and nearly requires some sort of objective analysis insofar as that is possible, and
another that is more geared toward spinning out a string of speculative questions with little or no backup.
"Was Saddam in league with aliens?" "Did Iraqis reverse-engineer alien tech?" "Did US invade Iraq to gain alien tech, under cover of a WMD
argument?" At this point we can as easily and effectively ask whether Saddam was in league with Nessie, John Titor or Popeye the Sailor Man. It's
all just wild speculation.
One or two facts ("America invaded Iraq") followed by a bunch of unrelated suppositions ("Did America invade to retrieve the crashed alien
craft?") makes for entertaining reading (see "Holy Blood, Holy Grail"), but it does not get one any closer to the truth of the matter.
So, speculate away and revel in it! Many of your threads are very imaginative and entertaining, and lead one to a great deal of speculation, but just
understand that some of the more "by the book" members such as Maybe...Maybe Not or karl 12 seem to be--in my opinion anyway--more swayed by
sourcing, analysis, evidence and data as opposed to a lot of "what if?" questions.