It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
THE family of US solo sailor Abby Sunderland are seeking public donations to save her crippled boat Wild Eyes from the Indian Ocean, despite claims they don't have the money to compensate the Australian Government for her $300,000 rescue.
Abby's mother Marianne Sunderland, who is pregnant with the family's eighth child, said the family did not have the money to compensate Australian rescue officials, with the rescue costing $300,000, the Courier Mail reported.
"The full cost of chartering an Airbus would be so high, you'd think they would have to work with the US Government for that," she said from her California home.
"We're not wealthy people," she said. "What price would you put on a child's life?"
Originally posted by jrod
It sounds like you guys think the military should be funded by private parties for their services.
The family has told heraldsun.com.au they were a clan of "adventurers, not accountants", but admitted they lacked the funds to cover the rescue costs themselves.
Mr Sunderland said that so far he has spent $250,000 financing Zac's and Abby’s trips, money he had set aside to buy a farm in Maine.
Originally posted by paraphi
On the one hand you have the "rich should pay for rescue" and the “stupid young girl” lobby and on the other you have those who think that Australia does the right thing by rescuing people regardless.
Originally posted by tezzajw
The dispute is about the irresponsible attitude shown by the rich little prat and the rich little prat's family. The dispute is about who should be paying for the rescue costs.
Originally posted by paraphi
Is it the word "rich" that gets you. If this was a "poor" person whould you have the same attitude. The cost of the rescue is fixed, so perhaps the poor person could (say) "work it off" over a few decades.
Originally posted by paraphi
If a cruise liner got into trouble would you suggest that all the rich had to pay? What income level do you think qualifies the person from exemption?
Originally posted by tezzajw
A poor person would not be able to sail a boat in the middle of the ocean. Poor people generally don't own boats that can make ocean crossings into International Waters. They don't have the means to indulge in frivilous stunts like the little prat did. .
Originally posted by tezzajw
Huh? Cruise liners have insurance. I imagine that the insurance would be part of the ticket price, which is passed on to the customers. Comparing apples to oranges is a pointless exercise.