It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

VIDEO: FBI Shows Up At Protesters House And Asks Strange Questions! Must Watch!

page: 10
120
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by warequalsmurder

Originally posted by nenothtu

Originally posted by warequalsmurder




What a strange idea. I don't have anything to fear from taking to the FBI, the US Marshal, or most anyone else.

You are saying you DO?

If not, why would you feel 'intimidated'?



Gheee, I have no idea why.

Wow, such honest and ground breaking psychology you exhibit. Yeah, I must be the only person in the world who has less than trustworthy opinions of my government. Such a slueth you are nenothetu. I'll bet you're called the brightest tool in the shed aren't you?


Not bright enough to ferret an answer to my question out of that non-response, it seems.


Did you manage to hide one in there somewhere? If so, it's hard to see through all that fear and emotion.




posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by SmokeytheHair
 



wouldnt you also be in the face of someone who knocks on your door, disturbes your days agenda and asks strange questions, because you dared expressing your oppinion in a protest in a democratic country?



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by warequalsmurder
 


Do you often attack people just because they dont see things the way you do? This kind of behavior could be indicative of why you have such disdain for law enforcement.

Ive seen you post one thing on this board regarding the OP and the rest has been hateful responses to people.........

If you dont have a rebuttal , then just dont reply........you dont have to be unpleasant



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by warequalsmurder

Originally posted by Hedera Helix


My quote is behind the link to your post... to which you are referencing.

[edit on 12/6/2010 by Hedera Helix]


No, I was replying to ManBehindTheMask and quoting him to boot. If you had followed the quote timeline as clearly displayed than you would have seen that. Not only that but you would have seen that the words being quoted pertained to his post that was in reply to a statement that I had made earlier.

Now drop this nonsense that is off topic and please move along with the subject matter at hand if you are capable of doing that rather than thread derailment attempts through trolling.


Well ya screwed up.



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Hedera Helix
 


Wrong you did.

Now repeat after me.

"I will not attempt thread derailment"



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


Touchy little thing you are aren't you?

If you can't take another person's reply then don't attempt disagreeing with them if your little emotions are going to get hurt in the process.

That lady had every right to film those agents and was absolutely correct in keeping them outside.



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vendetta1986
that's why It is good to have pit bulls and dobermans with rottweilers in your back yard and let them loose , to keep away these corrupt bastards.


Please don’t do that. My dogs I would only use as a last resort and only after guns fail.
My dogs are my best buddies; they are more comparable to my children than my weapons.
Back on topic I’m sure these agents were only there to harass this woman into thinking twice before she exorcized her god / goddess given rights.
Making this stop at her house is the only legal thing they could do, they just make it look like a legitimate concerned questioning.
ARE YOU SCARED??? YOU SHOULDN’T BE, YOUR’E ON SCARE TACTICS!!!



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:05 PM
link   
reply to post by hawkiye
 


I think the most plausable explanation as to how her name and address was found although an undercover agent is quite possible might have to do with her online activity and wire tapping. SInce prostests are usually organized perhaps the organizers got tapped and all that info leaked out and the FBI just took there investigation from there. just a thought take er easy.

Brotherman



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:06 PM
link   
reply to post by warequalsmurder
 


1st touchy? Not in the slightest

2nd I was referring to your general lack of respect for anyone on these boards, as you are new , ill let you in on a secret, if you continue to be rude and ugly to your fellow site members, they WILL ban you.

3rd Nobody said anything about her having the right to do what she did. Thats a given, the debate was over the authenticity of the film, and her general behavior to what were otherwise, 2 courteous FBI agents.

Given your demeanor, I can see why you see nothing wrong with the video or her confrontational attitude.....

Thus ending my discussion with you......



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by warequalsmurder
 


1st touchy? Not in the slightest

2nd I was referring to your general lack of respect for anyone on these boards, as you are new , ill let you in on a secret, if you continue to be rude and ugly to your fellow site members, they WILL ban you.

3rd Nobody said anything about her having the right to do what she did. Thats a given, the debate was over the authenticity of the film, and her general behavior to what were otherwise, 2 courteous FBI agents.

Given your demeanor, I can see why you see nothing wrong with the video or her confrontational attitude.....

Thus ending my discussion with you......


No, you were trying to muddy the waters of my point with crybaby tactics that only made you look like a spoiled kid who got his emotions hurt.

What you are attempting to do here is employ Ad Hominem by trying to establish that I was disrespectful to you by not kissing your posterior and thereby play the "your a rude brute" card who can not enter into a valid debate ploy.

I see right through you again.

This lady does not trust the government. I don't either. If you do then good on you. Just don't expect everyone else to bend over and take it when some FEDs show up on their doorstep just because you will.



[edit on 12-6-2010 by warequalsmurder]



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...the guy playing the fbi dude either didnt study his script very well or his lines were poorly written intentionally to give the perception that he's an idiot and the woman with the camera is a super-calm genius who has all the answers and is totally in control of the whole situation... fake, fake, fake...


Yes, the FBI guy was more timid then I would expect from an FBI guy,

I have had no experience with the FBI, but once I had to call the police because my home was broken into, they didn't act like pansies, and I was the victim.



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by warequalsmurder
 


really?
How bout you explain to me JUST how i muddied those waters? I guess ill also allow you to TRY and explain how you even had an argument?

Its pretty safe to so say that securely stated my opinions in a manner that was not only clear and concise , but sound as well.

Kissing my posterior has NOTHING to do it with it, it has to do with your RUDE behavior, and obviously im not the only one who has taken notice of it.

Once again, being cordial to two FBI agents, doesnt make mean you are taking it in the rear end from the government.......

It means you have a fair handle on how to treat people, and some social graces........

Something you very obviously are lacking



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Thus ending my discussion with you......


You shouldn't even be responding to me now.
Dude, you can't even keep your word.

Can you get back on topic again?

Watch and learn how people stay on topic:

This lady was well within her rights to film those agents and not let them into her house.

She did not equate how questions referring to hurting people had anything to do with a peaceful protest. I agree with her. I would have filmed them too. I would have had no problems invoking my rights as she did too.

Come back to topic ManBehindTheMask... Give it a try.






[edit on 12-6-2010 by warequalsmurder]



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
Answer no questions. Ask them to leave immediately. Report the incident (like she did, but also local paper, local tv etc). If you know you are innocent of any wrongdoing, even minimal cooperation sets the precedent and normalizes this sort of government intimidation. and yes its intimidation, she wasn't visited in connection with her nursing or her parenthood, or any of her other activities, we can assume, with a pretty good % of being correct, that her protesting Israel caused this reaction; as such it goes against the 1st amendment, in spirit, if not in legal actuality.



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by joechip
Answer no questions. Ask them to leave immediately. Report the incident (like she did, but also local paper, local tv etc). If you know you are innocent of any wrongdoing, even minimal cooperation sets the precedent and normalizes this sort of government intimidation. and yes its intimidation, she wasn't visited in connection with her nursing or her parenthood, or any of her other activities, we can assume, with a pretty good % of being correct, that her protesting Israel caused this reaction; as such it goes against the 1st amendment, in spirit, if not in legal actuality.


It is not intimidation. If you saw a neighbor was building a bomb, would you not report it and want the FBI to investigate it? Who knows what was said about this woman to draw attention to her. Maybe she was a loudmouth fool at the protest and someone felt she was going too far. Maybe she was trying to force her beliefs on others and intimidate THEM.

There are two sides to every story.

[edit on 6/12/2010 by pjslug]



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:43 PM
link   
Wow. Happened in Austin, a little too close to home for me. Back when I lived there 7 yrs ago I attended war protests, and the police were filming the protesters. That was back in my alex jones listening days,and it didn't sit so well with me... so i really do not doubt it was from the protests, they can say it was a tip, could have been, but they do not have to tell you the truth.



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   
reply to post by warequalsmurder
 


Youve been warned about your condescending posts, keep that in mind.

Secondly , you just keep stating the same thing over and over again...

Her right to film them was NEVER in question, how are you missing this?

I will state.........once again........the discussion was about 2 things

1. The authenticity of the film
2. Her general spiteful behavior and rude behavior towards the two agents, which instead of looking like a crusader, made her look like an ignorant twit, and more importantly exposed her need (as is the case with many people who follow this agenda) of being a "Victim".

Simple strategy, if you ARENT a victim, provoke until you ARE.
OR Make yourself out to be a victim, in order to further your cause.....

People who TRULY want to help other people do not act in this manner, their protests dont involve this sort of drama, for one simple reason......

Its not the attention that they seek, its to effect change........

This woman, just wants attention...........



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by joechip
we can assume, with a pretty good % of being correct, that her protesting Israel caused this reaction; as such it goes against the 1st amendment, in spirit, if not in legal actuality.


Actually we can't assume anything. We have no idea about context.
The supposed agent said that they receive a tip and had some questions, obviously in relation to the tip.

How do we know the agents (if they were agents) weren't there investigating a real tip???? We don't. We really know nothing about this video.



new topics

top topics



 
120
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join