It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pentagon Manhunt

page: 10
103
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 03:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol
reply to post by TSer78
 


it depends what kind of information


if its information on false flag or illegal activities, they should be available to the public


Petition your government for "What you need to Know", they will provide you with information relevant to your inquiry.



[edit on 13-6-2010 by TSer78]




posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:17 AM
link   
reply to post by TSer78
 


How can you have a username eluding to TruthSeeker78 and your avatar saying "power to the people" and still rationalise what you have just said in your previous two posts...

Just curious...



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:26 AM
link   
reply to post by TSer78
 


amazing, ... so amazing ..., you know the song? ...

yeah, cover operations are avaliable to the public ... righttttttttttttttt291113



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 06:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by ghostsoldier
reply to post by TSer78
 


How can you have a username eluding to TruthSeeker78 and your avatar saying "power to the people" and still rationalise what you have just said in your previous two posts...

Just curious...


Sorry I didn't entertain you, how is this post relevant?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 06:08 AM
link   
reply to post by TSer78
 


Sorry - sarcasm is sometimes hard to pick up on teh int0rnetz - I was flustered and annoyed at the time - my next door neighbour was grinding something. So apologies if you were being sarcastic. MEH!

__________________________________________________________________

I want to know whats happening with this, wikileaks should put a page up atleast explaining the jist of whats happening and whats going on. Bah!

[edit on 13/6/10 by ghostsoldier]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 06:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by TSer78

Originally posted by Faiol
reply to post by TSer78
 


it depends what kind of information


if its information on false flag or illegal activities, they should be available to the public


Petition your government for "What you need to Know", they will provide you with information relevant to your inquiry.



[edit on 13-6-2010 by TSer78]


Ahhhh what type of prescriptions drugs are you on bud? You have to be kidding right?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:24 AM
link   
What I don't get is how come he just doesn't walk into a crowded internet cafe with a flash drive and a netbook and publish this? Even if the government gets ahold of him, its already out there.

Any ideas why he doesn't just do this?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by mossme89
What I don't get is how come he just doesn't walk into a crowded internet cafe with a flash drive and a netbook and publish this? Even if the government gets ahold of him, its already out there.

Any ideas why he doesn't just do this?


Because he is brilliant..
and knows exactly what he's doing.
Something like this..
cannot be done in haste.
much as we might want it to, or think it 'should'...
They know what their doing.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Never mind, it's back up... wikileaks that is...

[edit on 13-6-2010 by Fingersoup]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 10:02 AM
link   
reply to post by mossme89
 



Originally posted by mossme89

Any ideas why he doesn't just do this?


Or... he doesn't have the said documents, just like they claimed via their twitter account. From what we've seen, Assange and his team are brilliant men/women, I wouldn't rule out the possibility that this information has been sent, as Manning claims, but it could be in their possession unknowingly, e.g. heavily encrypted files, fragmented files, etc. Who knows how they receive their data and how long it would take to actually decode 260,000 documents. I won't call Assange a liar because Wikileaks did say they don't have the documents, I'm just adding that they may not have them yet.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 10:18 AM
link   
Maybe the reason he doesn't just release it all is that it may actually contain some sensitive information, that is, something that would interfere with our actions and plans in Iraq and/or Afghanistan. There IS some information that shouldn't be out there for the world to see - for people's safety.

It may also contain some of the more "juicy" stuff that we SHOULD be privy to. Some stuff that being hidden to protect the guilty.

If that's the case, then SOMEONE is going to have to go through it all and make a decision about what is to be released and what is to be kept back. That would be an extremely difficult decision to make for any civilian.

I wouldn't want to be this guy right now, that's for certain! I hope he remains safe. If he is found, he definitely won't be safe.

GREAT story! A movie in the making for sure.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 10:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by BLV12
reply to post by jpvskyfreak
 


If he is caught most countries will hand him over to the Americans. Including Australia.


Except for France, who even let paedophiles (as long as they're rich enough) hide out in their midst.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 10:25 AM
link   
we would not be sheep if we were not kept in the dark... we would be empowered to decide our own fate... endangering lives.. how many lives have these suckers killed in the wars, and now with this oil spill etc..toxic material being released, chemtrails, bombing, killing reporters with cameras, lord knows what else. people are killed by the USA every day... but we can't release info which we should have because lives would be endangered. Danger is in the hidden secrets,dirty deals, polluting the air we breath, the water we drink, the food we eat, these so called public servants that my money pays for, are in doing every single day.. the time for secrets is at an end... maybe the secret is there is no more enemy to keep secrets for so they invent one.
I am really tired of all you people still claiming they have the right to act the way the do.....the government that is.... report to the nearest detention center...Mr. Orwell was right.
The government gave up right to secrets when they became corrupt.
just my opinion. So i say release it all and be damned... A corrupt system should fall in disgrace, rather than let continue.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 10:35 AM
link   
Question: how did the daily beast get hold of the chat logs ??



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 11:15 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 


What if it's information regarding a false flag attack, and he's waiting until the day of, or right after the attack to release it?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Relaxfreedom
Question: how did the daily beast get hold of the chat logs ??


Lamo is very publicity hungry. He probably gave it to them and others.
Strange enough, he said, he also gave it to wikileaks and one day later he said, he won't give it to them...



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 12:35 PM
link   
"I have two words for Julian- PREDATOR DRONE. You will never see it coming"- Barrak Obama.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Honestly, I'm at the point now that if I hear about something - whether it be through the mainstreamers or the minor players - I feel like it might be manipulative, like it's what I'm supposed to hear.

It could be the oil disaster being negligence or conspiracy (well, they aren't mutually exclusive really, are they?)....

Or, it could be documents to be leaked that are dangerous to nat'l security...

At what point can one be certain that what one is hearing is not meant to elicit a specific response or thought process? As a student of linguistics, I'm cognizant of the deceptive power of language.

George Lakoff (cognitive linguist who has written extensively about metaphorical conceptualization in language as well as framing) noted that Democrats need to learn what Republicans appear to have mastered. I disagree with Lakoff. I think that a big enough step back should show that for the most part, the fact that Republicans control their "message" so well, while Democrats do not, is part and parcel of the control mechanism.

This leads me to believe that the bs that is served up daily, from the trashiest of celebrity scandals to the leaking of major corporo-governmental corruption, is all working tangentially to reach a specific goal.


Quite the dilemma!



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:54 PM
link   
So,

A few weeks ago Julian said he was ''Right now we are sitting on history-making stuff''

Then Manning comes out as the guy who leaked the van footage.

Assange cancels a conference because his lawyers told him it wasn't safe to be in america.

Manning gets 'arrested' - He is being held - apparently being questioned about his / any involvement with wikileaks.

Julian says to the effect of "you see now why it isn't safe for me"

The Pentagon and/or State Department says they are not looking for Assange

Wikileaks says it doesn't have 260,000 cables.

Wikileaks hasn't said anything except that if Manning was the guy who leaked it - they are providing legal council.

Nobody knows where Julian is.




It really is like a movie - we're at the anti-climax now, and now we just gotta wait for the final showdown.

Is there anything I missed? This is rough and from memory - I'm thinking about creating a time line.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:36 PM
link   
reply to post by ghostsoldier
 


pretty much how id sum it up.
well done.
thanks.
you're right.. does feel like a movie! lol

Pretty sure they will be ok,
and know what theyre doing.

ever watch this?

7 parts.
very good!



new topics

top topics



 
103
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join