As stated in Section 5.3.2 of NIST NCSTAR 1, a document from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) indicated that the impact of a [single, not multiple] Boeing 707 aircraft was analyzed during the design stage of the WTC towers. However, NIST investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that “… such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building.…”

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by mikelee

---

If 911 was not a “grand deception,” why do you have it as your avatar?
You have stated in your thread that most of the OS is most likely true and there was mistakes made in some of the reports because they were rushed am I correct. Yet your avatar says something else entirely.
I do not believe, you believe what you wrote.

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by mikelee

---

WTC 7 could not have been wired in one day for demolition that is impossible it would have took miles of cable and not to mention every devices needs to be check and tested you are talking about a 47 story building not a house.

Your opinion was WTC 7 suffered serious damaged, what evidences convinced you of this nonsense? Do not tell me the photo with the funny looking shadow convince you.
Or the video of WTC 1 exploding and hurling steel beams 500 feet away yet the video appears to have been taken miles away where you barley can see what really going on.

Do you have a source for this information or is it your 100% un-expert opinion?

FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue...We, to this day, don't know why NORAD told us what they told us...It was just so far from the truth." ~ Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean, Former Governor of New Jersey
"We got started late; we had a very short time frame... we did not have enough money... We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people. ... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail" ~ Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton
At some level of government, at some point in time, there was an agreement not to tell the people the truth about what happened." ~ John Farmer, Senior Counsel to the 9-11 Commission in his book The Ground Truth (Page 4)

The book unveils how “the public had been seriously misled about what occurred during the morning of the attacks,” and Farmer himself states that “at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened.” The publisher of the book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, states that, “Farmer builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version not only is almost entirely untrue but serves to create a false impression of order and security.” The report revealed how the 10-member commission deeply suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation

Senator Max Cleland ~ Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003 Commission, resigned in December 2003 "I, as a member of the [9/11] Commission, cannot look any American in the eye... It is a national scandal... this White House wants to cover[9/11] up."

Senator Mark Dayton ~ Member, Senate Committee on Armed Services and Homeland Security "[NORAD] lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they lied to your 9/11 Commission...the most gross incompetence and dereliction of responsibility and negligence"

Congressman Ron Paul ~ Vice Chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee "the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation"

Congressman Curt Weldon ~ "[9/11 Commission] there's something very sinister going on here... something desperately wrong... This involved what is right now the covering up of information that led to the deaths of 3,000 people"

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney ~ Member of the House Armed Services Committee "the [9/11] Commission ran up against obstruction by the administration and non-cooperation from government agencies... the errors and omissions immediately jumped out at us"

Director of the FBI, Louis Freeh ~ "[9/11 Commission] findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself"

Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, PhD ~ "Distinguished national and international scientists and scholars present massive evidence that the 9/11 Commission Report is a hoax and that the 9/11 "terrorist attack" has been manipulated to serve a hegemonic agenda in the Middle East... We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to "pancake" at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false"

I could go on because i TOO like lots of others, have studied the events of 9/11.

What happened to the missile defence system at the Pentagon?

I know about a type of ship that is designed to have airplanes land on them(aircraft carriers), but if you crash airplanes into them, they tend to lose their structural integrity, catch fire, explode and maybe sink.

None say that 9/11 was an inside job.

Of course, you will use the quotemining skills of some other website, and swallow their interpretation lock, stock, and barrel.