posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 01:35 PM
After spending some time away from the 911 forum and doing some investigation into the 911 events to satisfy my own curiosity I now have some changed
beliefs in what happened. I have always thought that anyone stuck or hanging onto a beleif or opinion without the satisfaction to go out and explore
additional probablities is muddling through life with their blinders on. And that does not allow anyone to have a good wide view of what lies in front
Regarding the WTC Towers and after looking at a variety of materials on the internet as well as those I recieved from additional sources I can say
that the towers, in my opinion were not imploded by demolitions at all. The examples of free falling towers no longer holds water in my opinion. I
have observed several days worth of videos of controlled demolitions as well attended an actual one in person. After speaking with one the controllers
at the site I'm convinced that the WTC Towers were not caused to fall by explosives. However with this stated, I do believe that WTC 7 was caused in
part, by demolitions as it was beyond repair obviously and the use of demolitions only aided in brining it down for the safety of the public and
others on site that day. WTC 7 was brought down because it had to be. No other reason in my mind exists.
The NIST Report is flawed but not to any degree that it allows for a total assumption that the Towers were brought to the ground by explosives. It was
put together in a rush to a conclusion is now my opinion and well know very well how many mistakes can happen when things are rushed like that. I
believe people should sit back, grab a cold one and understand that this was the most dramatic event in our time and those who were responsible and
held to a degree of providing the answers did so under great pressure with no intention of malice whatsoever.
Did two planes strike in NYC on 911? Of course they did and anyone who has their eyes open can determine that. All of the misinformation regarding no
plane theories is just an attempt to extend an improbable theory that is baseless in context as well as any concrete evidence to prove it. In short,
its a load of manure pure & simple. There were way too many people on scene that day to even consider this in any way to be true and, contrary to
popular opinion there were many people who filmed them and took photos whose cameras and/or video cams were not "confiscated" as some have noted
falsely. In many of the videos the planes were filmed at varying angles and none have ever been proven to be faked, manipulated or otherwise despite
attempts by some whose editing skills outweigh their skill of telling the truth.
Did a plane crash into the Pentagon? I can now state without any doubt that one did. I have posted before the Global Hawk theory based on some bad
stills from the video at the Pentagon entrance gate that we all know and have seen before. Only after talking with some of my former friends who were
on scene that day in September, I can say without any doubt that an airliner crashed into the building. In my career of working in law enforcement I
actually do seek evidence depsite what I have posted on ATS in the past without any conrete evidence, afterall it is a theory based site. But after
being privilaged enough to see private individual's photos taken on that day by those who were there, that have not been released anywhere I now can
confidently tell anyone who doubts that there were any sizable aircraft debris or bodys of the passengers that not only were there indeed but that
there are plans in place to release a good amount of information with photos that will more than discount any of the theorys I have posted and others
as well regarding "no plane at Pentagon" or "it was a missile".
As for the Donald Rumsfeld slip, after this I now think he is just an o0ld fart whose mind was elsewhere that day when he made that comment. It IS
very convincing but it is not conclusive now in my opinion.
Now many of you know what I think happened in Shanksville and that has not changed. Why? Because in my quest for the truth regarding flight 93 I have
yet to speak to any military personnel (intelligence, enlisted, officers & civilians) that was directly involved with operations on 911 and who would
be in a position of knowledge who can say without a doubt within full confidence that it was NOT shot down. In fact what I learned was that many think
it was. I did try to locate the unknown Airman who alledgedly wrote a letter to another 911 website stating one of the fighter jets returned to it's
positioned based with one less missle than it left with originally. I could not locate anyone of the sort but I did hear from those I spoke with
regarding this, that they "heard something to that effect" or something similiar but none would go on record and say anything of the sort even
within a personal opinion context. I really do not blame them either.
I just have a difficult time thinking that an entire airliner vanshied into the ground then only 8% of the remains were recovered and that allowed
for 100% indentification of those onboard, that math does not add up. In addition I still am firmly rooted in the belief that based on the fact that
Shanksville was not the only confirmed debris site that the other two sites held the truth about what really happened. But, without any concrete proof
such as a peice of the airliner or soil samples to test for explosives that too, remains only a theory. I think though that many will remember the
national media reporting that the crash site was located deep within the woods of Pennsylvania and was difficult to access and that resuers were
trying to reach the site. We all know that the Shanksville location is NOT located deep within the woods and is fully accessible by roads leading to
it. But this fact regarding the sites has been forgotten by many except a few. I think that flight 93 will remain a mystery for years to come.
In closing I do not in any way expect everyone to agree with my conclusions but it is for my own satisfaction of the truth that must be based in not
only common sense but practical evidence as well. I do not believe everything the government tells us as I have operated during my career within that
very environment and know full well that there are events, occurrences and activitys that go unreported, covered up and sealed by those whose reasons
we may never fully comprehend or even get close to understanding. I also think that much of it is done for reasons of national security but in part,
is also done for the purpose of allowing actions to be taken that the general public may not fully understand and that it is best to keep it secret
than expose the entire scenario. If thats right or wrong I cannot say but I do want the truth about flight 93 because in my own opinion I think it
will unlock some other unknown aspects regarding the events of 911 and perhaps expose those who enabled this to be covered up.
I do admit though perhaps I'm totally wrong about flight 93 being shot down, maybe it did vanish in a hole and there was just too much energy
released at the impact point for the average person to understand and therefore everything in it just vaporized. Or maybe thats just too much of a
fantasy to believe and we are all right to doubt it. After all we have never seen the landing gear of flight 93 in any confirmed government photos and
the experts all agree that if anything, those should have survived the impact.
I do also believe that the TPTB realized what was going on and allowed it happen to further their war agenda as that aspect has well been proven to be
a fact that they planned for Iraq well in advance of 911. The events of 911 only was a coincidence that those in power either played dumb, or were
dumb, and allowed it to unfold in order to establish their baseline for their plans. afterall, they did do just that.
[edit on 6/9/2010 by mikelee]