It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Legal Verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn't withstand scrutiny

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   

Legal Verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn't withstand scrutiny


opinion.financialpos t.com


A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.

The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of
the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading c
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Cap and Trade Hoax.. This whole 'Global Warming' scam is nothing more then a push for global tax and regulation.

opinion.financialpos t.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 10:43 AM
link   
A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.

The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.”

Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.”

The 79-page document, which effectively eviscerates the case for man-made global warming, can be found here.



Read more: opinion.financialpost.com...
The National Post is now on Facebook. Join our fan community today.



posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by monkeySEEmonkeyDO
A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.








And next we'll have a review of the University of Pennsylvania’s Law and Economics Departments by the University's Basket Weaving Department. And I guess no one is surprised that the unbashedly pro-big business Financial Post would trumpet such an opinion piece. Notice even they didn't allege any factual base. The article was on the opinion page.Having a law professor critique a scientific discipline is as ludicrous as having a lawyer (Al Gore) promote one.



posted on Jun, 9 2010 @ 02:55 PM
link   
It's amazing how people are finally opening their eyes... If you follow the "money trail" you will usually find the motives behind these bills that are pushed onto us..



new topics

top topics
 
5

log in

join