Anti Gravity Achieved?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 10-6-2004 @ 03:29 PM by kyateLaBoca
go to this website: www.americanantigravity.com...

Under videos, find the hutchenson effect and watch it. There are many other experiments that show similar results, but could we have achieved some form of anti gravity? or is this a HOAX??

[edit on 11-6-2004 by Kano]


reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 04:14 PM by quadricle
ah yes! John Hutchison....'self taught' Canadian scientist (don't know what else to call him.....).....performed some shady/weird experiments in his BC apartment in the 70's or 80's, was also apparently hired/funded by the US government to conduct these experiments until PM Mulroney/CESUS [i.e. Canada] shut him down or seized his equipment.

I followed this story for a few years after listening to an interview with Hutchinson on the Art Bell show, even though he sounded boneheaded, it got me really interested in his experiments...or so called experiments......

Using some "mystery equipment" he claims to have successfully performed levitation of several objects via antigrav (actually he mentions something about the energy fields of his shady equipment causing the effect), melding of different metals together (Philadelphia experiment style), wood fused with metals and other crazy stuff...sounds cool doesn't it??

Well other than a few shady pixs and videos of objects appearing to levitate seemingly via strings or magnets (*cough* that you have to purchase from him....*cough*....)

I came to the conclusion, that since he was unable to recreate or even properly explain the experiments that this guy is a flake.......

still the "lifters" mentioned on
www.americanantigravity.com... actually work...but electromagnetic fields strong enough to move toothpicks and foil 6" off a table should be easy to make....right??

more info....if you must...
guns.connect.fi... (pixs)
www.geocities.com...


reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 09:47 AM by Kano
The lifters are not anti-gravity, they actually suck air down through the middle due to the Biefeld-Brown Effect (Wikipedia). The small positive electrode at the top ionizes the surrounding air, which is then drawn towards the large negative electrode at the bottom. The induced ion wind is what lifts the device. They have even been tested in a vacuum to make sure, the results coming up negative.


reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 05:39 PM by Janus
Boyd bushman used to work for Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co ( or Skunkworks as i believe its known). He seems to have got into a bit of a legal tangle with them regarding suppression of information about a portable energy device, not sure if he invented it tho.

www.globalsecurity.org...

That doesent mean that there isnt another Boyd Bushmen in Canada working on Anti-Grav experiments or even that the Boyd Bushman mentioned above isnt working on the same problem in Canada.

EDIT:Edited for typo

[edit on 11-6-2004 by Janus]


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 10:48 AM by beebs
reply to post by Supercool



Yes Boyd has made some cool claims. Here is a video of him with David Sereda. Newtons laws go bye-bye around 3:00 mark:



Part 2 is worth watching as well, just click on the youtube link and it'll be the first one on the right if you want to see it. Anti-grav documents from Boyd in the first couple min.

Electromagnetic Levitation Demonstration by Bushman:



Good stuff.



edit: haha I guess we'll try to revive this old thread. Dang, got me.

[edit on 2-6-2009 by beebs]


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 11:57 AM by DragonsDemesne
Just something I noticed in part 1 of the video, Boyd makes a claim about Einstein's theory being expandable by the binomial theorem, and that this gave the first five forces (usually I've seen this as 4, strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetism, gravity, but he had electromagnetism and magnetic separately). Since this was a claim that I can investigate from the comfort of my basement, I decided to check it out :p

www.relativitycalculator.com...

m = m0 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)

Using the maclaurin series you get: (valid as long as v^2/c^2 < 1, which is true as long as you aren't moving faster than light)

m = m0 ( 1 + 1/2 v^2/c^2 + 3/8 v^4/c^4 + 5/16 v^6/c^6 + 35/128 v^8/c^8 + 63/256 v^10/c^10 + 231/1024 v^12/c^12 + 3003/14336 v^14/c^14 + ... ) (hopefully I did the last couple terms right :p correct me if i messed up)

Then Boyd said if you multiply both sides by mc^2 you'd see the first eight forces...

(mc)^2 = m0 ( mc^2 + 1/2 mv^2 + 3/8 mv^4/c^2+ 5/16 mv^6/c^4 + 35/128 mv^8/c^6 + 63/256 mv^10/c^8 + 231/1024 mv^12/c^10 + 3003/14336 mv^14/c^12 + ... )

mc^2 is the rest energy of the mass, 1/2mv^2 is indeed kinetic energy as Boyd states, but after that, I don't recognize anything. I'll stare at it a little while longer and see if anything comes out at me.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 12:01 PM by Hazelnut
reply to post by DragonsDemesne



Very interesting. But I can't make out the meaning. Yes, I'm not that smart. Is it possible that you could translate your calculations into simple words for me?
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 12 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 0 days ago with 3 member flags