It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Paul McCartney actually die in 1966?

page: 4
14
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2010 @ 02:45 AM
link   
reply to post by jolois
 


It is really impressive how the powers that be thought quickly to avoid mass suicides by injecting an imposter or, it ain't true. I'd like to go with the mysterious here but to just have or even be able to locate someone who looked well enough to pass as Paul but, to have to sing just like him also?




posted on Aug, 3 2010 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 



Originally posted by WWu777

Originally posted by darkelf
I was 16 when this 'story' first broke. I didn't believe it then and I don't believe it now. There would have been no suicides in 66, had Paul died and the the news was released. It was a HOAX then and it is a HOAX now.



What about the photos and video by Heather Mills posted above? You didn't address them.

The photos clearly show two different people.

From 1964 to 1976 my mom had young teenage girls living in her house. Every week when she went grocery shopping, she would pick up a teen magazine for us. Do you honestly believe that from 1964 to 1969 when the PID hoax first came out, that I and thousands of other teen girls would not have noticed a change? Come on! Have you ever watched young teen age girls with these things. They stare at the pictures for hours.

On the other hand, has it occurred to you that maybe some of these Paul/Faul pictures could have been edited? If you like photos, here are some good ones from Macca Fun House

1967 1968 1969 1970 and later years



posted on Aug, 3 2010 @ 11:04 AM
link   
OH NO! NOT ONCE AGAIN!

Single Post:
Some people say this is not the same person (theonterguy), and I say they are the same - end of story. Call me arrogant, if it's your wish.




posted on Aug, 4 2010 @ 10:52 AM
link   
Wouldn't DNA comparisons help solve this riddle?

Why does this forensic tool appear in every investigation, but not here?



posted on Aug, 4 2010 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by davidmann
 



Originally posted by davidmann
Wouldn't DNA comparisons help solve this riddle?

Why does this forensic tool appear in every investigation, but not here?


Good question. Do you have any DNA from PM prior to 1966? If his mom was still alive they could use that or if he has siblings for comparisson. But who are the they who would even have a leg to stand on to suggest this?



posted on Aug, 10 2010 @ 02:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by cushycrux
OH NO! NOT ONCE AGAIN!

Single Post:
Some people say this is not the same person (theonterguy), and I say they are the same - end of story. Call me arrogant, if it's your wish.





A few years ago, i was intrigued by comparisons like that. Then i realized that they were produced by a certain camp of people who wanted others to beleive that Paul died and was replaced. I started collecting lots of lots of Beatles pictures and made my own comparisons. Find two pictures of the same angle, with the same or similar facial expression and of equal quality: then there is no "Faul". It's the same Paul all the time.

Here is a link to my photobucket with many, many comparisons that put this rumour to rest:

s948.photobucket.com...






EDIT:

Just realized Darkelf already linked to these..

[edit on 10-8-2010 by diabolo1]



posted on Feb, 26 2015 @ 01:09 PM
link   
I love the movie. It seemed plausible for the most part. The most glaring inconsistency is the whole Yesterday song. This song was obviously written by Paul, not John. There is plenty of footage of him singing it in concert. I believe the album Yesterday and Today came out later, after Paul had died, so the album cover fiasco is believable. But how can John writing Yesterday for dead Paul be possible?



posted on Feb, 27 2015 @ 02:10 AM
link   
a reply to: jolois

When I came across this today I first dismissed it, thinking how could MI5 find someone who was near enough alike to fool people. May be possible, but not over night so to speak. Then the though came to me, maybe if they killed him and had it planed for months. Naturally the next question was, yes ok but why, what could Paul do that would warrant this?

Well 1966 was about the time that Jimmy Savile and all the other pedophiles where getting going. For sure Paul McCartney would have know all of them + what they where up to. Just suppose, he new about a Royal connection. Now there is a reason for a hit by MI5 if there ever was one. Just a theory. Something to think about for sure.



posted on Feb, 27 2015 @ 03:18 AM
link   
a reply to: MAC269

Back from 2010, quite possibly THE most ludicrous thread I have ever read on ATS.

However, it is what it is.

Why would MI5 or anyone care about suspected mass suicide? Were these Beatles fans not the great unwashed at the time, potential revolutionaries? The government of the day would me more likely to Whack Macca if they thought the result would cripple these upstarts.

Oh and it is clearly the same person from Beatles to wings to macca. Take it from a fan, band on the run, macca genius!



posted on Feb, 27 2015 @ 11:08 AM
link   
Probably the same guy.

But it sure looks like he's morphed into an old British lady...lol

Aging has not been kind to the ol' boy.



posted on Feb, 27 2015 @ 11:17 AM
link   
proof Macca is alive and well..



posted on Jan, 18 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys, but I am someone of considerably much younger age. From an unbiased view, I would definitely say that Faul looks like a totally different person then Paul. As many has pointed out, Faul has a longer chin and a longer nose. From what I know, your head shape and nose doesn't change with age. If I really have to guess, they are a different person. Although, there's a possibility that the car accident might have wrecked his face and he looked a little different after facial reconstruction. I guess there's no way to prove it lest of DNA testing.

I am thinking many of you really underestimate how two totally unrelated people can look alike. I have seen it a few times myself before. Once there was a local celebrity lookalike competition, and there was one guy whose features was 99% similar to the guy, the only difference was his head shape was a little shorter.

Take a look at this link of celebrity lookalike in the past.
www.seenox.org...

Although unrelated by blood there are a few of them which looks like the same person MORE SO than Paul and Faul. Namely (Keep in mind the mentioned below didn't even went under the knife to look like each other yet):

1) Jennifier Lawerence and her Egyptian twin-actress Zubaida Tharwat
2) Orlando Bloom and Nicolae Grigorescu
3) Alec Baldwin and President Millard Fillmore
4) Zach Galifianakis and Louis Vuitton
5) Nicolas Cage and a Tennessee man from the Civil War Era
6) Eddie Murphy
7) Jay-Z and a man from Harlem in 1939
8) Tilda Swinton and David Bowie
9) Queen Latifah and Zora Neale Hurston

If I am the media and told you that the above are the same person, you would believe it totally and be none the wiser. Just my two cents.




top topics



 
14
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join