posted on Jun, 7 2010 @ 07:36 PM
IMHO, they dont use money because they dont follow the concept of ownership. No entity would lay claim to a certain bunch of atoms being strictly
theirs, the only thing they really own is their own body. Without ownership, why have money?
If they see themselves as one, believe in oneness. Then they realize they are just one being experiencing many different facets of themselves. Other
people are other selves, they are you (infinite consciousness) having a different set of experiences through a different body. Hence one would treat
others as they wish to be treated because others are a different part of them. Harming others is indirectly harming the self, taking from others is
taking from the self, and helping others is helping the self.
If their philosphy was such, then all would contribute to the society for the love of wanting to help, all work would be volunteer. It would be far
more efficient than competition in this dog eat dog world. Due to work being volunteer people could do what they are gifted or skilled at, or help out
where they feel society needs something done not where the money is. Think about no money or effort being wasted on things like advertising, no work
is done to put a leg up over other, rather all work is beneficial to the others as well as the self. Working in unison they may find long work weeks a
thing of the past. Sharing of all means no rich elite and no starvation or poverty. They would be immensly wealthy with very little effort, the
slackers would do little to such an efficient system, and having grown up in a world where all is given to them for free and the people are so kind
they would naturally feel they want to give a little back and guilty about being only a taker, if they followed the philosophy they would see slacking
is actually hindering themself.