It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by Flatwoods
Iranians are not Arabs they are Persians. Arabs and Persians have been rivals in the region for millenia.
If the Iranians are building an nuclear weapon it will be as a defensive measure to prevent any attempt of regime change by the Americans and Israelis (And prob the British lurking in the background)
Why would Iran bomb Israel which contains Jerusalem, one of the holiest sites for Islam?
Why would Iran nuke Israel and bring on its own apocalypse through the massive nuclear response of both Israel and the U.S.?
[edit on 7-6-2010 by Peruvianmonk]
Originally posted by seeashrink
I wish all you bleeding heart, anti-semite liberals would all get on the same boat or airplane and go to Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Syria, and Russia. You know, where you will be appreciated.
Seeashrink
"This was a forcible, non-negotiable, separation of weapons from commandos who had already murdered two brothers that I had seen that day. One brother with a bullet entering dead center in his forehead, in what appeared to be an execution. I knew the commandos were murdering when I removed a 9mm pistol from one of them. I had that gun in my hands and as an ex-US Marine with training in the use of guns it was completely within my power to use that gun on the commando who may have been the murderer of one of my brothers."
"If the Fascist Zionist Jews returned to their homelands, I'm sure that they would be appreciated for what they are."
Originally posted by largo
reply to post by super genius
My aren't we just full of ourselves.
If you are the same guy on Philly.com you should return there.
The fact is the Zionists believe in supremacy.
Now we know that due to their unique genetic makeup (Finally.), they have remained an isolated sub-species. Most likely they have done this for their own purposes but they may also have not been allowed to breed with the rest of us.
This indicates that they can have an agenda that is only known to them. They have the ultimate security code, their DNA. If you don't pass that test, you never become part of the cabal.
I like the fact that this is known now. It'll make it easier to figure out who needs to be vetted when this is all over.
[edit on 8-6-2010 by largo]
Originally posted by largo
reply to post by Masterjaden
Jaden,
You must be a very privileged person to KNOW that the Iranians would nuke Is-it-real at the first chance possible.
We know that you will nuke a discussion at the first chance you had to defend a fascist state. So who do you serve? What's your agenda? What makes you believable?
As to being Masterjaden, is this what your nanny calls you.
Originally posted by largo
reply to post by Eagleheart56
I think I have noticed a trend here. Since this is a conspiracy site, I'm sure it will be of great use in future discussions.
The usage of extreme terms for onscreen names is directly related to outrageous fascist, deluded and irresponsible statements.
Whether they are plans, replies or commentary they all devolve into rants or bursts of scorn.
Am I wrong about this?
The level of irresponsibility is also proportionate to their commitment expressed in their screen name. I propose that Super, Master, Doctor, etc. included in these names are a direct linkage to potential schizophrenics or juveniles.
In order to sort that out, I think that our ages should be associated with our screen names or that the admin go ahead and make a formal study. Half past human could probably do a web-bot to perform that function. It could sort out the extremist and do an age profile along with the names.
It would give us a better sense initially as to who we should shun for their puerile and undistinguished intellects.
I guess that group could include me but I'm old.
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
reply to post by Masterjaden
I find your use of the term..."there wasn't much torture going on." odd...as
there was some but not much. Am I wrong in that? You know Geneva convention and all that.
Originally posted by letscit
There are more and more countries, people and organizations lining up now, to do exactly what these flotilla's set out to do. It will be interesting to see what tact Israel uses in the coming weeks and months. I have my opinion on how they will react but hope I am wrong. They seem to want to use their religious belief to set diplomatic relations. This makes them no better than the one's they hate. I hope the best for the coming humanitarians.
On Monday, Israel attacked a boat carrying what it said was "a squad of terrorists wearing diving suits on their way to execute a terror attack." A survivor who was on shore at the time of the attack said the six men on the boat were members of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, an armed group which is loosely tied to the secular Fatah movement of Western-backed president Mahmud Abbas, but that there were no weapons on the boat. He said they were doing swimming exercises some 100 metres (yards) off the coast when they were attacked by Israeli naval forces.