reply to post by FOXMULDER147
I haven't seen much footage that cant be explained by something man made or in some cases, the evidence presented doesnt match up to the testimony,
original video data isnt and wont be provided. If you have geniune footage and examples that lean against my theory or opinion then please do post
If we look back at all the submitted data on ATS over the last few months, the quality isnt getting any better, this is largely because people
''I wont shoot video because its too easy to fake''
not with a real video analyst it isn't. If your video capture is 100% real and geniune and not edited to the point where the original information is
wiped out then a true analyst will confirm its geniune.
Everyday on this site we get photographs and videos that dont address the hoaxers angle or the legitimacey questioned from previous video or
photograph submissions and we get no closer to better footage.
When one person posts up a video that gets explained as something else, what prompted that explanation. For example most videos are explained for alot
1. It's a hoax, and the submitting person is using something to create the object on screen articificially. Usually backed up by the fact their
testimony to the event doesnt match up. They are also usually not able to provide original footage.
2. The analyst cannot tell how far the object is or how big it is by the information on the screen.
The second point should be greatly addressed. as of right now. As civilians we should be looking into better methods of video capture. Better
technology to capture these phenomena. When one persons video is explained or refuted because the object is too far away or not discernable enough,
the person seeing this video should go out and address that point for the next video.
I myself have shot some video using Hitachi 8mm video camera, it was submitted here but the examples given to me have already been addressed at what
it could be and what i can do to improve my next video capture.
So the answer to all civilians, that really want to do something about unexplained aerial phenomena is to prepare yourself better, pre-address the
points already mentioned from other sightings and evidence provided. Make sure that if there is soemthing on the video camera whether it be a
measuring device or a tracker that you have it, to help provide better data to the analysts here. I think anyone not wanting to do their utmost best
at this will always be discounted. If your geniunely interested, honest and have good intentions of getting that great capture, you'll have:
1. A testimony that matches your video evidence.
2. Great video evidence that adresses any pre-points made from other sightings; distance, height, object size, cgi points.
3. be willing to help in every way with investigations by analysts into your sighting.
4. be adaptable and willing to take other peoples explanations into consideration and also be willing to take advice from more experienced people in
5. Be honest,. not just with the community, but with yourself too.
Like I said in the previous post. I do admire the gutsy, need to do something. But if its going to happen it needs to be a concentrated effort by a
group of people intent on capturing the right technical data that to provide analysts.
I applaud also the recent thread/report being worked on by chadwhickus regarding the right/wrong way do's / donts of video capture and reporting
UFO/UAPs. We all need to focus our concentrated efforts better towards this aspect.
It's illegal to interfer or shoot down any aircraft or passing object, maybe so but if all we're doing is using equipment made available at retail
to record that said object... that isnt illegal. I just think if we're taking a risk, it should be a calculated one. not one that lands us or the
investor in hot water , whether that be with an agency overseas... or someone from another planet.