It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Greens protest Obama Administration proposals that would dismantle Social Security, public housing

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Morgan Le Fay
 



that would be my guess, so can we at least have the money we paid into SS, to bury us?


Yea, the acronym SS having two meanings, apparently. Well if that's the case, let's start with David Rockefeller and all the elder Rothschilds. Since it is primarily the elite of their caliber which are creating the circumstances for these issues, and are pushing eugenics policies and implementing health(death)care which implies in essence forced euthanasia after one gets to a certain cut-off age, they can be the first bags of air to go the way of the policies they're pushing.



[edit on 6-6-2010 by Morgan Le Fay]




posted on Jun, 7 2010 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Morgan Le Fay
Yea, the acronym SS having two meanings, apparently. Well if that's the case, let's start with David Rockefeller and all the elder Rothschilds. Since it is primarily the elite of their caliber which are creating the circumstances for these issues, and are pushing eugenics policies and implementing health(death)care which implies in essence forced euthanasia after one gets to a certain cut-off age, they can be the first bags of air to go the way of the policies they're pushing.

[edit on 6-6-2010 by Morgan Le Fay]


I have seen lots of people on ATS and elsewhere overtly support forced eugenics and natural disasters as "a necessary means to rid the planet of useless eaters".

If we who care about the enviroment and each other are "useless eaters" or "a bunch of monkeys that need to be tossed off the planet" then what does that make the elite scum who cannot make a single good decision it seems? Oh the irony! If there actually was an over-population problem then why would they hide their intentions till the end rather than confront the public and tell us what needs to be done? I would definitely support a maximum 3 child policy and make it very hard for those that want more children this way in 50-100 years the worlds population would gradually decline rather increase.

Of course we all know over-population is primarily a 3rd world problem due to lack of family planning, lack of education, lack of self-worth, lack of entertainment, lack of any decent jobs...LACK OF EVERYTHING other than having sex and performing ancient rituals. Everyone is responsible for their plight including europeans and americans that rather exploit them for cheap labor and their collective stupidity rather than help them get ahead.

So the elite rather than confront the root causes of each problem directly prefer the backdoor approach of letting nature and HAARP do the dirty work. They look good wearing a 3-piece armani suit and driving in their porsche/lamborghini while pretending everything is cool and under control.

Indeed everything is "under control" but not by the elite or the people, it is under satan's control. Does not "illuminatti" mean "the enlightened ones" deriving their light from lucifer? Lucifer as in THE DEVIL?

[edit on 7-6-2010 by EarthCitizen07]



posted on Jun, 7 2010 @ 10:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by Morgan Le Fay
Yea, the acronym SS having two meanings, apparently. Well if that's the case, let's start with David Rockefeller and all the elder Rothschilds. Since it is primarily the elite of their caliber which are creating the circumstances for these issues, and are pushing eugenics policies and implementing health(death)care which implies in essence forced euthanasia after one gets to a certain cut-off age, they can be the first bags of air to go the way of the policies they're pushing.

[edit on 6-6-2010 by Morgan Le Fay]


I have seen lots of people on ATS and elsewhere overtly support forced eugenics and natural disasters as "a necessary means to rid the planet of useless eaters".

If we who care about the enviroment and each other are "useless eaters" or "a bunch of monkeys that need to be tossed off the planet" then what does that make the elite scum who cannot make a single good decision it seems? Oh the irony! If there actually was an over-population problem then why would they hide their intentions till the end rather than confront the public and tell us what needs to be done? I would definitely support a maximum 3 child policy and make it very hard for those that want more children this way in 50-100 years the worlds population would gradually decline rather increase.

Of course we all know over-population is primarily a 3rd world problem due to lack of family planning, lack of education, lack of self-worth, lack of entertainment, lack of any decent jobs...LACK OF EVERYTHING other than having sex and performing ancient rituals. Everyone is responsible for their plight including europeans and americans that rather exploit them for cheap labor and their collective stupidity rather than help them get ahead.

So the elite rather than confront the root causes of each problem directly prefer the backdoor approach of letting nature and HAARP do the dirty work. They look good wearing a 3-piece armani suit and driving in their porsche/lamborghini while pretending everything is cool and under control.

Indeed everything is "under control" but not by the elite or the people, it is under satan's control. Does not "illuminatti" mean "the enlightened ones" deriving their light from lucifer? Lucifer as in THE DEVIL?

[edit on 7-6-2010 by EarthCitizen07]


It's nice to know at least there are some who've at least thought through all of the factors of the issue at hand. The merit of a society, IMO, can be judged by how they treat their children and elderly. And we're royally BLOWING IT.



posted on Jun, 7 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
I think I'm with the OP and "going green".

The whole right/left conservative/liberal paradigm is done to death.

There is no scarcity of any natural resource, there is no overpopulation. The retirement age does not have to be raised they need to stop stealing money.

Privitization does not work. The corporations run things now and you want to make them stronger. Yet you also claim to be against Obama.

Wake up people, Obama's a tool, the conservative viewpoint is propaganda, and scarcity is fictional.

I mean really the truth can't get any simpler.



posted on Jun, 7 2010 @ 11:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 


This is been planned for many years even before Obama, the privatization of SS and Medicare is been in the table for a long time, Wall street wants to those two entitlement programs as they are a steady influx of tax payer funds.

I opened a thread on this a few weeks ago

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Remember all this privatization is to fall in the hands of the fat rats in wall street.

Now with the blunder they have done to our economy, people retirements, people savings, homes and more, they now wants congress to give them more

Can you trust the fat rats?



new topics

top topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join