Originally posted by wannabe
Guys -
Evolution "disprove" God? Come on, think logically. First of all, "Nothing can be its own first cause."(Aquinas) If you didn't exist, could
you make yourself?
Hmm, seems you have just stated that your Bibles own teachings of God's existence is then false. Your teachings say God has always existed, yet you
say nothing can be it's own first. So, which one is it?
Originally posted by helen
Because God has always been there...........
The Bible tells us in genesis .....
Are you using God's book to prove God?
The stories of Gods of the old way - Appolo, Cronus, Rhea, etc - have been in written word longer than the Bible, thus making them real.
It can't be different rules of truth for each.
Originally posted by Noone
When talking about God's or 'God' you cannot apply laws of physics. Their very nature is that they are not bound to space and time,
..................... snip .........
A very profound point
Just wanted to point out, imo, some rational thinking (don't see that much any more, heh).
Originally posted by The Blade Runner
what about the possibility that we created ourselves, if you dont understand what i mean, i am not going to explain it....
If you are going to post the title of a theory, but with stipulation that it be understood without discussion , all you've accomplished is making
every reader to read your post in vain. A completely sensless and useless post.
Originally posted by marko
I really don't see how one can distinguish between God and an alien.
Hot damn !! More rational thinking !! WOOHOO !!! lolol.
Seriously, that is such a fine point you make. We have heard of both alien and God for countless years (of alien - look at ancient art & legends).
There are so many referrences of alien in the Bible it stumps me how hard core Bible believers do not see this .......... except that they are
indoctrinated to
not think.
Originally posted by Thorium233
There is a god and Jesus loves all of us.
And that statement is profitable to this discussion in what manner?
Originally posted by wannabe
"back when we were primitive"
How do you know we were primitive?Read Rene Noorbergen's book - it discusses a load of artifacts and archaeological phenomena that point to one
logical conclusion - our distant ancestors were at LEAST as far advanced as we are today.
So you have sources that do not entail me going out and buying a book? I have been around a good many years, and have not seen anything you speak of.
I have only seen evidence spear chuckin' grunts looking for food. If they were at least as advanced as man today, where is
anything showing
that? You can not tell me that evidence of this nature, should your claim be plausible, is only in one book that you cite.
Originally posted by wannabe
How long have you been on this board?
Just curious, how is that relative to this thread?
=================
That is all.
Over and out.
10-4
Roger Wilco.
Who is Roger anyway?
Eh, gimme a break, it's Saturday morning and I'm bored
OK!?!? lol
NN