It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was the Texas dispute that provoked the Mexican War. Americans had settled in Texas, they didn’t assimilate, they became the majority, and seceded from Mexico in 1836.
That was not the first time that Mexico lost territory. Upon independence in 1821, Central America had been part of Mexico, but Mexico lost that territory in the 1820s. Funny, I never hear about a Mexican "reconquista" of Central America.
Even the Mexican Constitution doesn’t claim the Southwest! That’s right. The Mexican Constitution, in articles 42—48 spells out the extent of Mexican territory. It mentions Mexican islands, continental shelf, and airspace, Mexico’s 31 states and federal district, but it never mentions California, Texas or Arizona
Today our leaders apparently see no problem in merging us with Mexico, despite the differences between our societies.
They are merging our countries on several levels. At one level is the mass migration of Mexicans into the U.S. coupled with a multicultural ideology which encourages non-assimilation and retention of their Mexican identity. At another level, inter-governmental agreements are moving us closer to some sort of North American Union.
Due to a variety of factors (including national security), issues surrounding the U.S.-Mexico border have been in the forefront of discussion for many months. The precise number of Mexicans entering the U.S. illegally each year is impossible to accurately determine, but estimates average out to about 1 million. The motivation for the majority of illegal immigrants from Mexico is, as we are all aware by now, primarily economic.
The fact of illegal immigration presents us with an unappealing choice: either we must grant amnesty to immigrants who have come here illegally, or we must erect a barrier along our southern border that would be comparable to the Great Wall of China. Amnesty would reward criminality, and would make citizens of many who no doubt deserve it, but it would also grant the sacred rights of citizenship to a great many scoundrels and criminals who, having no respect for the laws of their own nation, have come to ours illegally, where they crowd our jails and prisons.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
ain't gonna happen as long as some of us
are still breathing.
Originally posted by manta78
reply to post by Jim Wolf
That's is some kind of statement to make.
Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
This addresses neither of my questions.
The fact of illegal immigration presents us with an unappealing choice: either we must grant amnesty to immigrants who have come here illegally, or we must erect a barrier along our southern border that would be comparable to the Great Wall of China.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
This addresses neither of my questions.
maybe not, but you sir should realize your
thread's intention was to only give 2 choices.
Add Mexico or All of Central America. You
denied anybody from giving you other choices.
So that means you have a fixed agenda for posting
this thread.
Originally posted by manta78
reply to post by RedmoonMWC
Even if the annexation issue ever came up for a vote on a formal basis, and was agreeable to a required percentage of Americans, and citizens of the Latin, Central and South American countries,(how probable is that?) I would ask just one question, and that is can we afford it?
And if you look at the definition of annexation in the traditional sense as mentioned here:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"1. the process by which an incorporated city expands its boundaries to include a specified area. The rules of annexation are established by state law and generally require a public ballot within the city and the area to be annexed. Other incorporated areas are generally protected from annexation by an adjacent city. Example: Annexation is generally sought by a city to expand its boundaries by taking in an area to which it may already be providing services.
Many unincorporated suburban areas, however, resist efforts to annex them into the city because of possibly higher tax rates and loss of local control over schools and other services."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And the current financial condition we are in right now in the United States, the answer is no.
[edit on 5-6-2010 by manta78]
Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
Mexico fits, the people of Mexico are voting with their feet by moving to the U.S. in record numbers and we are already providing services to them.