It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bush unprotected as he boarded Air Force One on 9/11

page: 2
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 01:18 PM
link   
BoneZ, just saw your subsequent post so no reply necessary, thanks.




posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 01:19 PM
link   
*delete*







[edit on 5-6-2010 by _BoneZ_]



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Clearly the President was aware of the danger he was in, as well as the source of that danger. He was on his way to the green room for a little schooling.

It is good to remind the world exactly how such unquestioned by the media 'change', any change, became possible. The media are complicit in this disaster, and the one that followed.

Anyone with any real aspirations of restoring our Republic, best stay out of politics.

There are a kajillion ways that zionists control our leaders. A kajillion...



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 03:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Rafe_
 





Airforce one went without a squadron to protect it on that day wich is putting it lightly,odd enough. Add to that ,the fact that bush just sat there for almost half a hour after hearing about the second plane crashing into one of the WTC's and the fact that he lied about it a couple of days later claiming he saw the first plane hit live on TV while he was actually sitting in the class room that day for all to see.


Odd enough? Prior to 9/11, there was NEVER a "squadron" covering Air Force One. Nothing ODD about it in the slightest. Then you bring up the drivel that he sat there for a half hour after the second attack?

Do ANY of the "truthers" ever do any accurate research???



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...Good grief you conspiracy people...


Funny but aren't you the one who seems to think there is a conspiracy to blame the 9-11 attacks on the US government?

Doesn't that make you a conspiracy person? I mean you are on a conspiracy forum trying to claim we're all in it together in a so called 'truther movement' to put blame for the attacks on Bush and co.

To me you seem more rabid and desperate than any of the 'truthers' to point fingers at people and claim they have ulterior motives.
You seem to live in this forum, you must have a very empty life to have so much time to spend here commenting on every post and spreading the lies of the OS.

You are the ultimate conspiracy theorist...



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by Rafe_
 





Airforce one went without a squadron to protect it on that day wich is putting it lightly,odd enough. Add to that ,the fact that bush just sat there for almost half a hour after hearing about the second plane crashing into one of the WTC's and the fact that he lied about it a couple of days later claiming he saw the first plane hit live on TV while he was actually sitting in the class room that day for all to see.


Odd enough? Prior to 9/11, there was NEVER a "squadron" covering Air Force One. Nothing ODD about it in the slightest. Then you bring up the drivel that he sat there for a half hour after the second attack?

Do ANY of the "truthers" ever do any accurate research???



There usually is no a escort because USUALLY there arent multiple hostile craft in U.S airspace.Your argument simply does not make much of a point.


There where 4 planes reported in restricted airspace over american soil.2 of them crashed into the WTC's and one suposedly into the pentagon all while Bush was sitting in a elementary school where he was anounced to be weeks in advance.

Couple that with to so called confusion as to wich threats where real and wich ones where not thanks to the all those excersises being held in the air all over the country i would say !hell yeah! ,amazingly strange that the presidential plane did not have a escort.


He did sit there for almost half a hour after hearing the news.He even took the time to chat with the teacher afterwards,You dont have take my word for it ,its all on tape so go ahead and pretend it is not so.

He would not have needed more then 2 minutes to make a calm excuse and exit without "scaring" the class.



But then again acording to you he did not lie when he said he had seen the plain crash into the building before he went into that classroom wich makes matters even worse.



I have still not seen anyone here refute the points i made.

[edit on 5-6-2010 by Rafe_]



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

Thanks for revealing the above, Six. I see all of your posts are strictly in the 9/11 forum. That makes one wonder about agendas.



Care to elaborate on this further? What do you think my "agenda" is here?



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:56 PM
link   
I believe this thread has been THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED !!!
(Thanks to weedwhacker.)
The signs of desperation by some people are pathetic.

So, would we agree, HOAX??

NEXT...




posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rafe_
There where 4 planes reported in restricted airspace over american soil.


Clearly you don´t know what "restricted airspace" is.
The hijacked planes on 9/11 were not flying in restricted airspace.




posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 08:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by rush969
I believe this thread has been THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED !!!
(Thanks to weedwhacker.)
The signs of desperation by some people are pathetic.

So, would we agree, HOAX??

NEXT...



Like i said i have not seen anyone refute what i posted in here ,you are more then welcome to give it a try tho.







Originally posted by rush969

Originally posted by Rafe_
There where 4 planes reported in restricted airspace over american soil.


Clearly you don´t know what "restricted airspace" is.
The hijacked planes on 9/11 were not flying in restricted airspace.




Would you care to eleborate on that?


Since when was the area over NYC where these plaines flew and crashed not ever restriced?

[edit on 5-6-2010 by Rafe_]



posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Rafe_
 


" ...after the SS agent whispered to him that a plain had hit the WTC,The second plane according to the whitehouse report.

It is also safe to say that the whitehouse report on this is correct as we all know the look on George's face when the SS agent whispered in his ear to tell him about this. "


No offense but , Andrew Card , who whispered into Bush's ear , was CHIEF OF STAFF , not a SS agent .

Also , it was a story about a pet goat , not a little sheep .



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 07:57 AM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


Applause!!



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 08:34 AM
link   
reply to post by GoodOlDave
 



GoodOlDave, i have seen your signature at the bottom of your posts that 9/11 was NOT an inside job and that the "attacks" were carried out by 19 hijackers from Saudi Arabia, well why is it the case that 7 of those the FBI claimed to have been hijackers are actually alive and well??? and why has the FBI never corrected there list? And why has the 9/11 commission report include the names of 7 " hijackers" that are alive and well??

You may or may not be aware that the FBI wanted list which has Osama Bin Laden included makes nor reference to th 9/11 events and does not state that bin laden is wanted in connection with these events.

An FBI spokesman when asked why there was no reference to 9/11 on Bin Ladens wanted poster stated that the reason there was no mentin of it on the poster was beacuse the FBI had no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, and that REMAINS the case today, still no evidence that he was in anyway behind these events, other than a a video of OBL, that has proven to be a fake as it is clearly not Bin Laden in the video. I will of course be waiting to hear what evidence you can present that proves without doubt that Bin Laden was responsible, if you have any that is.

Also another point that seems very odd is that a passport of one of these apparent hijackers was able to survive the impact into the WTC the huge fireball that resulted from that, flew across the air and landed in a street a few blocks away totally intact and was handed to a NYPD detective by a member of the public, i mean how far fetched can it get.

WTC 7 was so badly damaged that it fell down and freefall speed or thats what people would have us believe, it is the first time in history that 3 buildings collapsed at near free fall speed as a result of fire, you should also note that WTC7 does not even get a mention in the 911 commission report, very odd once again.

I mean i could go on and on about the things that simply dont make any sense with the whole 911 event but i dont think it would make much odds to you, you are blind if you cannot see the obvious, if you take the word of your government and the official version of events of 911 as stated by the 911 commission then quite frankly you have been duped and brainwahsed into believing what they want you to believe.

Research the issue, the events and draw your own conclusions based on what you find out, NOT what the US government tells you happened. I simply do not accept that this was a terror attack by Al Qaeda and nothing i have seen or read from official sources makes me think otherwise. wake up my friend.



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 09:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by SpecialAgent25
Research the issue, the events and draw your own conclusions based on what you find out, NOT what the US government tells you happened. I simply do not accept that this was a terror attack by Al Qaeda and nothing i have seen or read from official sources makes me think otherwise. wake up my friend.


Special Agent 25... Welcome to 2010! 99% of your off topic post was debunked back in 2006.



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chance321
It may appear that way, but you can bet they had snipers all over keeping an eye out for trouble.

And what if they overlooked that one Al Qaeda sniper with a clear shot?


Can't remember where, but I remember him throwing out the first pitch for a baseball game after 9/11, no Secret Service near him on the mound, but you can bet there were plenty of snipers cover his back.

Was this ball throw during a "surprise terrorist attack" too?



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Saytan75
Should there be someone on his arm like he's being led up the isle?

Um, yeah! There was "surprise" terror attack going at the time.

I mean no one thought the Pentagon would be hit, right?



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six Sigma
ATH911...

You obviously have never been part of the preparation of a Presidential visit. I have. I have worked hand in hand with the USSS on 4 occasions. Twice so far with the Obama administration.

How many times during a terrorist attack?

.



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ATH911
 


Sigh...another day in the lives of EVERY President, and Air Force One...the level of security REMAINS THE SAME, at all times...




Which one of those was during a terrorist attack also?



Typically at the bottom of the airstairs (not shown in OP...wonder why???):

What good would guards do at the bottom of the stairs if the President is exposed going up the stairs:



and especially when he turns to wave at the crowed right before he enters the plane?



If you were an Al Qaeda sniper on 9/11 scoping the airport, when would you take the shot?



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
Oh, well....BTW, I saw the source of the OP photos, so they really aren't in question, it was a point to make, though. Anywho, from the SAME source, THIS photo was not submitted in the OP (Again, I wonder why?....):



Do you see the President unguarded and exposed in that photo?

Please use a little common sense next time weedwhacker.

[edit on 6-6-2010 by ATH911]



posted on Jun, 6 2010 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ATH911

Originally posted by Six Sigma
ATH911...

You obviously have never been part of the preparation of a Presidential visit. I have. I have worked hand in hand with the USSS on 4 occasions. Twice so far with the Obama administration.

How many times during a terrorist attack?

.


Strawman.

For obvious reasons, I can not get into the specifics of what precautions are taken for a Presidential visit. What I CAN tell you that each and every visit takes WEEKS of preparations and THOUSANDS of dollars.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Sorry.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join