It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cloudbreak
I am certain just about every satellite that gets launched these days would have a $50 webcam built in, but why can't the public ever get this view of earth? The technology is basic. Is there a reason that no live, real-time video is offered, and the only view of earth that can be had is pretty much still shots, chosen specifically by various agencies?
Originally posted by cloudbreak
reply to post by RichardPrice
Yes that may be an issue, but surely there are some very lightweight, compact cams that can handle the contrast. I was just thinking, 30 years ago they beam back fairly good live (or slghtly delayed) TV images from the moon (or a studio depending on your belief), yet there doesn't seem to be anywhere that has live webcams of really cool things in space.
I am sure there are cameras on the mars explorer beaming back live streaming images. Likewise on all those probes they send out into space.
But it seems the general public are blocked from access.
What would be so difficult about getting a high-quality cam on any one of the sattellites? There is one on the space station, but it is 15-second shots. This is what it looks like, and to me is quite ridiculous the supposed view, when there is way better technology available. (The space station itself is obviously layerd on top, just to show its position supposedly, but the view is meant to be live and real).
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c4fbf01d90df.jpg[/atsimg]
Maybe there is too much 'traffic' in space, so real-time, live-streaming video is a no go.
NASA does have a cam too on the space station, but again, the field of view is very restricted, and the image quality very very poor.
Originally posted by cloudbreak
reply to post by RichardPrice
Well, because I am reasonably certain that costs could be controlled, and would for certain parties be viable business-wise.
I read some time ago a university had basically put a satellite in orbit on a million dollar budget. However, I don’t think a dedicated satellite for this purpose would be needed.
Streaming video could probably be converted to some sort of efficient frequency, then just picked up by existing groundstations and fed onto the Internet fairly easily. A solar-powered satellite could produce enough power I imagine to power the camera, while whoever owned the satellite would benefit from cost-sharing.
I thought maybe there is more to it than just cost issues. I had read (now I don’t know how true this is) that the amount of ‘unknown’ spaceships coming and going from earth, as well as in space in general, is staggering. Maybe there is some sort of limits put on space/earth surveillance for this reason. I’m not being conspiratorial, but I did have this thought.
Originally posted by cloudbreak
reply to post by RichardPrice
I'm not sure if this is being done on a commercial basis yet, but I also thought putting some high-powered webcams on commercial airplanes would be good too (with a view aspect facing down to the ground). I know they have Internet on some flights, so maybe this would be good for some airlines so users could just jump from plane to plane and see what's happening.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
I'm still at a loss as to your business case for doing it on a commercial basis however.