It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Committee of 300 - the Book

page: 1
<<   2  3 >>

log in


posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 02:57 PM
I did a search for this book by Dr. John Coleman for another thread, looking for specific information I needed regarding the global financial meltdown we're experiencing. I found it on Scribd and downloaded it because it's such an important book for NWO research.

I did a search to see what's already on ATS about it, and got lots of results, but I did not see a thread devoted to the book itself.

First, I'll quote the first paragraph of the Foreward:

In my career as a professional intelligence officer, I had
many occasions to access highly classified documents, but during
service as a political science officer in the field in Angola, West
Africa, I had the opportunity to view a series of top secret
classified documents which were unusually explicit. What I saw
filled me with anger and resentment and launched me on a course
from which I have not deviated, namely to uncover what power it
is that controls and manages the British and United States

I am grateful for people who become angry when they see injustice and then put themselves out there at risk to themselves to do something about it.

I see that he states he was the first in the United States to educate the public about the Club of Rome:

On 30th April 1981, I wrote a monograph disclosing the
existence of the Club of Rome identifying it as a Committee of
3OO subversive body. This was the first mention of both of these
organizations in the United States. I warned readers not to be
fooled by the feeling that the article was far-fetched and I drew a
parallel between my article and the warning issued by the
Bavarian government when the secret plans of the Illuminati fell
into its hands. We shall return to the Club of Rome and the role of
the Committee of 300 in U.S. affairs later herein.

I have heard Alan Watt talk about the Club of Rome and their book The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome. He quotes them as saying "that should fit the bill." Watt is referring to their concocting global warming as an excuse to control the planet's resources.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 03:10 PM
This is comical!!

In the intelligence community, it is taught that the
best way to hide something is to place it in open view. As an
example of the foregoing, when Germany wanted to hide its prize
new Messerschmidt fighter plane in 1938, the aircraft was put on
display at the Paris Air Show. While secret agents and spies were
collecting information from hollow tree trunks and from behind
loose bricks in a wall, the information they sought was staring
them right in the face.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 03:55 PM
This is significant:

One needs to have a clear understanding of just why it is that nuclear power is so hated all over the world, and why the fake "environmentalist" movement, established and financially supported by the Club of Rome, was called upon to wage war on nuclear energy. With nuclear energy generating electricity in cheap and abundant supplies, Third World countries would gradually become independent of U.S. foreign aid and begin to assert their sovereignty. Nuclear generated electricity is THE key to bringing Third World countries out of their backward state, a state which the Committee of 300 has ordered to remain in position.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 04:10 PM
Regarding NATO:

. . . the Club of Rome and its financiers under the title of the German Marshall Fund were two highly-organized conspiratorial bodies operating under cover of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and that the majority of Club of Rome executives were drawn from NATO. The Club of Rome formulated all of what NATO claimed as its policies and, through the activities of Committee of 300 member Lord Carrington, was able to split NATO into two factions, a political (left wing) power group and its former military alliance.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 04:19 PM
The term "One World Government" is better:

The name, New World Order, is seen as something developed as a consequence of the Gulf War in 1991, whereas the One World Government is recognized as being centuries old. The New World Order is not new, it has been around and developing under one or another guise for a very long time but it is perceived as a DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUTURE, which is not the case; the New World Order is PAST AND PRESENT. That is why I said earlier that the term One World Government is, or ought to be, preferred.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 04:56 PM
Thanks for sharing this book

I will be checking it out later,

it sounds like a pretty good read.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 05:21 PM

Originally posted by InvisibleObserver
Thanks for sharing this book

I will be checking it out later,

it sounds like a pretty good read.

I look forward to your comments.

I'm hoping this book will help us connect dots, and maybe come up with ideas for solutions.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 09:57 PM
This list of the committee's plans is already posted on ATS, but I'll recap it here. I noticed that the number "13" is left off the list.

(1) A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their direction. . . .

(2) The utter destruction of all national identity and national pride.

(3) The destruction of religion and more especially the Christian religion, with the one exception, their own creation mentioned above.

(4) Control of each and every person through means of mind control and what Brzezinski call "technotronics" . . .

(5) An end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call "the postindustrial zero-growth society." Exempted are the computer and service industries. United States industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labor is available. Unemployables in the wake of industrial destruction will either become opium-heroin and or coc aine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination process we know today as Global 2000.

(6) Legalization of drugs and pornography.

(7) Depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in
Cambodia. . . .

(8) Suppression of all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Committee. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments presently being scorned and ridiculed by the Committee and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the Committee's conception of "limited natural resources" right out of the window. A fusion torch properly used could create unlimited untappeed natural resources from the most
ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion and would benefit mankind in a manner which is as yet not even remotely comprehended by the public.

(9) Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people by the year 2000, people they call "useless eaters." The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title the "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050.

(10) To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. . . .

(11) To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then "managing" such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980. There will be more on FEMA as we proceed.

(12) To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already functioning which includes rock "music" . . . To continue to build up the cult of Christian fundamentalism begun by the British East India Company's servant, Darby, which will be misused to strengthen the Zionist state of Israel through
identifying with the Jews through the myth of "God's Chosen People" and by donating very substantial amounts of money to what they mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of Christianity.

(14) To press for the spread of religious cults such as the Moslem Brotherhood, Moslem fundamentalism, the Sikhs, and to carry out experiments of the Jim Jones and "Son of Sam" type of murders. It is worth noting that the late Ayatollah Khomeini was a creation of British Intelligence Military Intelligence Division 6, commonly known as M16, as I reported in my 1985 work, "What Really Happened In Iran."

(15) To export "religious liberation" ideas around the world so as to undermine all existing religions but more especially the Christian religion. . . .

(16) To cause a total collapse of the world's economies and engender total political chaos.

(17) To take control of all Foreign and domestic policies of the United States.

(18) To give the fullest support to supranational institutions such as the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the World Court and, as far as possible, make local institutions of lesser effect by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the United Nations.

(19) Penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign integrity of nations represented by them.

(20) Organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place. . . .

(21) Take control of education in America with the intent and purpose of utterly and completely destroying it. . . .

Stewart Swerdlow talks about the plans the Illuminati have for a one-world religion. Alex Jones talks about the one-world government with one central bank, and the eugenics program, among other things, that the globalists want. Alan Watt often quotes Brzezinski as saying we will not be able to think for ourselves; we'll expect the mainstream media to do it for us. Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, former Senior Policy Advisor in the U.S. Department of Education, is a whistle-blower on the deliberate lowering of educational standards in the U.S.

posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 10:06 PM

In the intelligence community, it is taught that the best way to hide something is to place it in open view.

That is true
The best place to hide something IS right in front of you.
S&F thank you for your post

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 06:03 AM

Originally posted by Mary Rose
I have heard Alan Watt talk about the Club of Rome and their book The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome. He quotes them as saying "that should fit the bill." Watt is referring to their concocting global warming as an excuse to control the planet's resources.

In the Foreward to The First Global Revolution it is stated that their first publication, The Limits to Growth, appeared in 1972 as a report to (rather than by) the Club of Rome. It says that the study was commissioned by the Club and that the report and the controversy it generated immediately gave the Club of Rome worldwide visibility.

It says that since 1972, the Club has published eighteen reports, including Mankind at the Turning Point, which was a computerised growth model and included a strong warning in terms of money and human suffering which would result from delays in taking action.

I remember that there was a lot of discussion about over-population in the 70s. And I think even among conspiracy theorists, some people believe we are over-populated. I think it's hard to have an intelligent discussion about it because where can we go for reliable information?

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 03:44 PM
Concerning Zbigniew Brzezinski:

The "Solidarity" movement was a creation of the Committee of 300's Zbigniew Brzezinski, who chose the name for the "trade union" and selected its office holders and organizers. Solidarity is no "labor" movement, although Gdansk shipyard workers were used to launch it, but rather, it was a high-profile POLITCAL organization, created to bring forced changes in preparation for the advent of the One World Government. . . .

Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled "The Technotronic Era," it was commissioned by the Club of Rome. The book is an open announcement of the manner and methods to be used to control the United States in the future. It also gave notice of cloning and "robotoids," i.e. people who acted like people and who seemed to be people, but who were not. Brzezinski, speaking for the Committee of 300 said the United States was moving "into an era unlike any of its predecessors; we were moving toward a technotronic era that could easily become a dictatorship." I reported fully on "the Technotronic Era" in 1981 and mentioned it in my newsletters a number of times.

Brzezinski went on to say that our society "is now in an information revolution based on amusement focus, spectator spectacles (saturation coverage by television of sporting events) which provide an opiate for an increasingly purposeless mass." Was Brzezinski another seer and a prophet? Could he see into the future? The answer is NO; what he wrote in his book was simply copied from the Committee of 300's blueprint given to the Club of Rome for execution. . . .

What could be more sobering than this?

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 05:06 PM
Regarding Milton Friedman:

It is worth noting that Von Hayek - who is a founder member of Heritage - used his student, Milton Friedman, to preside over the Club of Rome's plans to deindustrialise America using the Reagan presidency to accelerate the collapse of first the steel industry, and then the auto and housing industries, for example.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 05:25 PM
Regarding the Anti-Defamation League (ADL):

Another group representative at the December 1980 Washington meetings with "observer status" was John Graham, also known as "Irwin Suall," head of the fact-finding committee of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADL is an outright British intelligence operation run by all three branches of British
intelligence, that is, M16 and the JIO. Suall's extensive bag of dirty tricks was garnered from the sewers of the East End of London. Suall is still a member of the super-secret SIS, an elite James Bond type of operation. Let nobody underestimate the power of the ADL, nor its long reach.

I had never heard of the JIO so I did a search.

Wikipedia says that the JIO:

The Joint Intelligence Organsiation (JIO) was a former Australian government intelligence agency. . .

I'm not sure what Dr Coleman means by all three branches while listing two.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 06:16 PM
Regarding the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA):

For the record, nothing that happens in the U.S. happens without the sanction of the RIIA. It is a continuing and ongoing agreement first OPENLY entered into (there were many such secret agreements before that) by Churchill and Roosevelt in 1938, under the terms of which U.S. intelligence services are obliged to share intelligence secrets with British intelligence.

This is the basis of the so-called "special relationship" between the two countries about which Churchill and Lord Halifax boasted and which "special relationship" was responsible for the U.S. fighting the Gulf War against Iraq for and on behalf of British interests, more especially British Petroleum, one of the most important companies in the Committee of 300 in which Queen Elizabeth's immediate family has a big stake. No intelligence activity has taken place since 1938 except through this special joint command structure.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 06:56 PM
Regarding the use of an agent provocateur:

. . . Philip Agee joined the CIA after graduating from Notre Dame where he was inducted into its Jesuit Freemason ring. Agee first came to my attention in 1968 as the intelligence officer behind the riots at the University of Mexico. One of the most important things about the Mexican student riots was that they occurred at the same time as student rioting in New York, Bonn, Prague and West Berlin. With the coordination expertise and its special intelligence network of which INTERPOL is an integral part, it is not as difficult as it might seem at first sight for the Committee to set in motion carefully timed global actions, whether they be student rioting or deposing leaders of supposedly sovereign nations. It is all in a day's work for the "Olympians."

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:16 PM
John Colemans work, as 'interesting' as it may seem, is unsourced an totally unverifiable. He makes claims that are just vague enough to appear to be prescient, yet not in any way definitive enough to be called on to be useful in any fashion, IMO.

I found that in his writings he makes many assumptions, and errors that, given a little research, wouldn't be there.

Take this for example.. You cite

Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled "The Technotronic Era,"

Yet, Brzezinski wrote no such book. The closest titled work of his would be "Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era" (note the spelling differences)

While i appreciate Dr. Coleman's enthusiasm in his lectures as well as his writings, i have also read his work entitled "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations," I simply found too many of his conclusions, assumptions and assertions to be either too far out or simply too incredible too be taken as being all-together factual.

I really cannot add any more than i did in a previous post about Dr Coleman's research subjects.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:24 PM

Originally posted by And Why
Take this for example.. You cite

Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled "The Technotronic Era,"

Yet, Brzezinski wrote no such book. The closest titled work of his would be "Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era" (note the spelling differences)

This is a distinction without a difference.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 07:29 PM
I am reading this book right now thanks to a link in the OP so it was convenient to see this thread pop up again as I resurfaced for air because I now have so many questions regarding this book and the main one is what do you think are the chances that there could be some truth to this?

Forgive me for asking and I mean no melodrama but this book is so shocking and actually so petrifying regarding the total depths that a secret society with a global reach would sink to in order to hold on to and expand power and perpetrate their plans at our expense I found myself becoming tight in my limbs with a worried trepidation that I have brought up daughters into such a world.

It is in a word, ‘Nuts’ and in being nuts it cannot be true can it that such a nightmare is among us and manipulates every single aspect of our lives? It is as if George Orwell was only partially accurate when he penned his book and he would have been more accurate had he written a 1984 that described sleepwalking everyone to slavery and battlefield, fooled everyone into thinking that the free world they think is free is only a illusion.

The masters who really own everything in some manner, shape and form have skilfully manipulated information and education to the point where reality has cracked wide open and before we know it we have grown up believing the hype so completely that we think that slavery, this life is freedom when it is not.

I should be afraid with these thoughts bubbling up but I am not as fear is not something I try to give wings to if I can help it because when death has lost its authority what is there really to be afraid of? So no, I am not afraid but I am anguished at such hate and depravity aimed at me without even seeing me. From reading this book I am left with a sinking feeling that there is no hope because what point is there to anything if this is true and can we really ever beat such a thing even with vast numbers, skill and will?

Anyway I dived into reading it after downloading the PDF version and to be honest, what I expected to find was a typical miscellany of conspiracy nightmares intricately cobbled together to create an Orwellian scene of such proportions that I would feel like I would want to go to my bed and sleep with one eye open and the light on.

The horror thus in reading was to discover from the authors point of view that much of anything that happens in the world from wars to financial collapses and social upheavals have all been intricately planned years if not decades in advance by the committee of 300, the Club of Rome, the Bilderbergers and so on for reasons that have all to do with removing our freedoms in everything from love, to work to plans for our futures.

Which particular group that carries out the acts is not so much important as to discovering who specifically is involved in handing out these orders. For these things to happen there would need to be a vast infrastructure, sleepers, mercenaries, outsourcing companies that clear the jobs to a myriad of so many different administrators of misery that my head is spinning with the complexities of it all.

It cannot be true can it?

They would all be in on the game and in being in on the game it seems that this force levelled at us is much larger then we might think and from reading the levels they sink to, they will sacrifice anything to see their plans advance.

I have a feeling that if this is true and with all the horror in the world and the way it all seems to connect with someone’s agenda it could be true. Really then if it is true then what chance would we have against such a monstrous machine that thinks of us as useless eaters and thus can decide our fate for us and plan for our genocide in the long term?

The thought that there is a powerhouse of total contempt aimed at society just because we exist in large numbers is a possibility that really has been causing me some anguish because I had always held onto a hope that we could fight this, we could one day throw low-life minds like this out of their oak panelled offices and into the streets and then pick ourselves up, take stock and then try to make things better.

My emotions from reading this book are in a state of unenthusiastic flux because I am left with a dreadful sense that the infrastructure is too large for even an organised people to resist, the people involved with being a part of the monster are too numerous and what’s more they have vast knowledge from finance, biology to social psychology and access enough to subvert law and military against a people.

They have so much leverage over world leaders that much seems obvious to me but I thought – hoped even that I was probably just hopelessly paranoid. Sadly no, I think there is something to this because much of what has happened in recent years from war to disease to stock markets strife and social pain could have been planned out in a smoky room with funds and will no obstacle to inflicting world wide misery. How many are a part of the game and do we really want to find out?

What chance do we have other than to be a big fat target on some guy’s foresight as he takes aim from the darkness as you walk your dog or take out the rubbish and worse could ending you be worth harming your family too – I would think the answer to that is a definite yes.

I am not done reading yet but even so, a piece of me wishes I had not bothered – my thoughts are scattered by the contents therein. Do you think the subject matter within this book could be true and if so – how could a people ever hope to resist such a thing?

Enquiring minds really would be interested in some opinions in that regard.

[edit on 5-6-2010 by SmokeJaguar67]

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 08:02 PM
reply to post by SmokeJaguar67

I have been retired for four years now so I have had a great deal of time to research and absorb the horror of the realities in this book. I believe it to be true.

I feel that the hope lies in the beautiful human spirit that will keep showing itself as those like Dr Coleman continue to speak out and people like us continue to listen and then look for ways to help. I am a supporter of Alex Jones. He is making progress waking people up. Once a critical mass of people wake up, then we can join together and refuse to cooperate with the controllers. We also need to be supporting ideas for monetary reform so that we're not at the mercy of the controllers for that necessity of life: money. I like Ellen Brown's ideas in Web of Debt.

Thank you very much for your post.

posted on Jun, 5 2010 @ 08:02 PM
reply to post by SmokeJaguar67

To tell you the truth,when I first started looking into these things,I,too,was shocked at how all-pervasive it has been and how we,as mere humans are unable to stop it.

The only way it makes any sense at all is to see it through the word of God,and that this is all in effect the workings of Satan to deceive and enslave the whole world.

Consider this,"You will know them by their fruits!"

I hope and pray that your study leads you to consider these things in light of the Word of God and that He will comfort you in all you are coming to grasp with.

While the conspiracy may be larger than most would care to realize,it is actually far simpler to understand in light of God's wisdom He desires for us to seek.

There is a reason the Bible has been mocked and derided,and the message now is equated with "Hate-Speech". If people can't see a satanic agenda in that,then their eyes are truly blind.

I know many will not see it this way,but no offense is intended,I assure you.

[edit on 5-6-2010 by On the Edge]

new topics

top topics

<<   2  3 >>

log in