It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
For trying to change the system from within
I'm coming now, I'm coming to reward them
First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin
I'm guided by a signal in the heavens
I'm guided by this birthmark on my skin
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons
First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
If someone is a conspiracy theorist, they're going to see whatever they want to see in these messages. This is becuase conspiracy theorists aren't out to learn the truth about anything. They're out to connect the dots out of a bunch of unrelated events to form the picture they themselves want to see, like a Rorschach test.
The song refers to the "naivety and narcissism" of the West German Red Army Faction, "...designer terrorism by celebrity terrorists, as much about radical chic as about real politics."
"First We Take Manhattan" is a song written by Leonard Cohen. It was originally recorded by Jennifer Warnes on her 1987 album Famous Blue Raincoat, which consisted entirely of songs written or co-written by Cohen.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
And you are on this conspiracy board, to point that out to people?
You've got a lot of nerve coming here to insult a large part of the ATS community.
At least we are connecting dots, what are you doing?
I'm here to point out just how badly you're being raped by these damned fool conspiracy websites
Originally posted by Point of No Return
Such arrogance. I think I can judge what's BS, and what's not, for myself.
If you don't appreciate the fact that I'm pointing this out to you, well, I can't help that.
If someone is a conspiracy theorist, they're going to see whatever they want to see in these messages. This is becuase conspiracy theorists aren't out to learn the truth about anything. They're out to connect the dots out of a bunch of unrelated events to form the picture they themselves want to see, like a Rorschach test.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
You are trolling obviously, you generalize all conspiracy theorists, on a conspiracy site. You insult or ridicule a large part of the community on the very nature of the community itself, therefore, you are a big fat troll.
The only thing I generalize about conspiracy theorists is that they're otherwise intelligent people and that deep down I know they mean well, but they're simply getting all their information off these self serving conspiracy web sites.
If someone is a conspiracy theorist, they're going to see whatever they want to see in these messages. This is becuase conspiracy theorists aren't out to learn the truth about anything. They're out to connect the dots out of a bunch of unrelated events to form the picture they themselves want to see, like a Rorschach test.
Here's a thought for you to consider- Rather than my actually insulting you, are you simply perceiving my attack on these conspiracy claims as a personal attack on you yourself?
I have the truth and the facts on my side so I don't need to insult or ridicule anyone
"Silverstein ordered them to 'pull it'", and other bogus claims that's been debunked time after time after time after time
You conspiracy people certainly aren't stupid, it's simply the case you accept whatever you read on those damned fool conspiracy web sites as gospel without checking to see if their rubbish is even true.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Unless you didn't know, most of this board's members are conspirasy theorists in one way or the other. This is a c-o-n-s-p-i-r-a-c-y website.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
Deep down they mean well? So generally they mean harm?
"Silverstein ordered them to 'pull it'", and other bogus claims that's been debunked time after time after time after time
By whom? The debunk attempts are bogus themselves.
What about taking the gov's word as gospel?
Actually, ATS is one of the biggest, if not the biggest conspiracy site out there.
Is ATS one of those "damned fool conspiracy sites"?
Pathetic!
Yelling, "conspiracy" without tangible evidence to back it up is fostering false public unrest. It's akin to yelling, "fire" in a crowded movie theater. The intention to protect people from being burned up may be there, but being crushed in a stampede ain't any better.
We've already had one case where one 9/11 conspiracy theorist drove cross country to shoot up the Pentagon so you can see right away how horrobly irresponsible these "the gov't is out to murder us all" conspiracy stories can be.
Case in point- Silverstein's "Pull it" quote. do a Google search on the original quote, and you'll see that Silverstein didn't say HE ordered WTC 7 to be pulled. He said THE NY FIRE DEPARTMENT ordered WTC 7 to be pulled.
Remember, Silverstein says this means to withdraw fire fighters from a dangerous area. It's your conspiracy web sites who say this means to blow up with controlled demolitions.
Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated plainly in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish WTC 7 late in the afternoon of 9/11. In the documentary "America Rebuilds", aired September 2002, Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." [wmv download]
In the same program a cleanup worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6: "... we're getting ready to pull the building six." [wmv download] There can be little doubt as to how the word "pull" is being used in this context.
So who does this? Certainly not me.
If this place were a true conspiracy web site, they'd have banned me a long time ago.
I don't particularly care if you think I'm pathetic, or if I'm an idiot, or if I go around kicking pregnant dogs.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Unless you didn't know, most of this board's members are conspirasy theorists in one way or the other. This is a c-o-n-s-p-i-r-a-c-y website.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
Do you deny that conspiracies have ever existed in human history?
Already one case! How convenient for you.
Some people go crazy for whatever reason. I think the white house has also been shot at before 911, for whatever other reason by some guy.
Did I claim anything that was disputing that?
Jeah, that's what Silverstein says. They said they ordered to "pull it".
Not "pull them out", or "pull them", no "pull IT".
"Pull it", a demolition term.
In the same program a cleanup worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6: "... we're getting ready to pull the building six." [wmv download] There can be little doubt as to how the word "pull" is being used in this context.
No, you just believe the OS. I can't see how an objective person could not see at least one thing very wrong with the OS.
These conspiracies you're describing are so monstrously sinister and would require so many co-conspirators to pull off, that it's practically guaranteed it would be exposed, if not from whistleblowing, then from clumsiness. Sheesh, Bush can't even out a CIA agent in retribution without hordes of journalists tracing it back to him.
That does not disprove the fact that these ridiculous 9/11 conspiracy stories are attracting unsavory charactors for the extreme antiestablishment outlet it provides them.
Case in point- Silverstein's "Pull it" quote. do a Google search on the original quote, and you'll see that Silverstein didn't say HE ordered WTC 7 to be pulled. He said THE NY FIRE DEPARTMENT ordered WTC 7 to be pulled.
Noone but the conspiracy people has ever claimed "pull it" is a demolition term. that's another bit of rubbish these conspiracy web sites are using to muddy the waters.
pull down 1. To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building.
Mostly, becuase the "evidence" you're using to justify your reasons for the "OS being very wrong" is mostly bovine scatology being spoon fed to you by these damned fool web sites to deliberately get you all paranoid over shadows.
Doesn't it strike you just a little odd that despite my supposedly being a troller, I know all your own conspiracy claims better than you do?
If someone is a conspiracy theorist, they're going to see whatever they want to see in these messages. This is becuase conspiracy theorists aren't out to learn the truth about anything. They're out to connect the dots out of a bunch of unrelated events to form the picture they themselves want to see, like a Rorschach test.
Of course not. There have been lots of conspiracies- Watergate, Iran-Contra, Tea Dome scandal, the $64,000 question TV show fraud,
hese conspiracies you're describing are so monstrously sinister and would require so many co-conspirators to pull off, that it's practically guaranteed it would be exposed, if not from whistleblowing
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Unless you didn't know, most of this board's members are conspirasy theorists in one way or the other. This is a c-o-n-s-p-i-r-a-c-y website.
No, actaully, this place is more of a conspiracy clearing house, where the proponents of any and every conspiracy from 9/11 to JFK to moon landing hoaxes can come and discuss them.
ATS Background: The Popularity of "Alternative Topics"
While "conspiracy theorists" are often derided or the target of jokes, the fact remains that Americans love a good conspiracy theory. Many of the more popular and highest grossing movies are based on core ideas of UFO's, government conspiracies and related coverups. The phenomenon of the "X-Files" television show and "Da Vinci Code" novel and movie are excellent examples of how these topics have a inherent soft spot in the culture.
The Internet has provided millions of people the means to examine their attraction to conspiracy theories and share their thoughts, observations, and speculative ideas with like-minded individuals around the globe. Indeed, many have postulated that we're seeing a renaissance of conspiracy theory speculation because of the Internet. Magnified by our often troubling current events of terrorist attacks, 9/11, and political turmoil; Web sites that feature discussion boards invariably have one or more sections that touch on some core conspiracy themes. In fact, it's normal to perform a search-engine search on topics such as 9/11 and discover nearly 90% of the first 1,000 returns are conspiracy-theory-related. There has never been a better time for a professional approach toward encouraging discussion and debate on conspiracy and related "alternative topics."