Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Curious that they took guns from the Israeli's opened fire and not 1 Israeli solider died, they would have gone for head shots to kill, if they were
I saw the weapons removed from the ship so it is obvious the people were not pacifists.
But this is spin, both sides are spinning this.
Yeah, I saw the "weapons" too. As a matter of fact, those "weapons" weren't "weapons" at all. It was stuff that was laying around the ship
that were used for self defense when they were illegally fired upon by the psychopathic Israelis. Anyone that calls those tools weapons are simply
making excuses for the Israelis because they don't want to believe the situation that is occurring right before their eyes. Or, they're just simply
You're trying to complain that the people who were fired upon were not Pacifists??? Let me tell you right now...Pacifism goes out the window when
someone is firing bullets at you. Would you have preferred that they didn't defend themselves at all so that the Israelis could have gotten a higher
body count??? And not a single ONE of those activists had guns, knives, or anything of the sort. They had tools that were already on the ship that
they used to defend themselves.
There's no spin here. Israel was CAUGHT RED-Handed doing what Israel does best...terrorism...plain and simple. Need I drop a reminder here...
It was the Europeans that were on board that caused the public outrage after viewing what the Israelis did to INNOCENT people. Imagine what would
have happened if the Israelis had accidentally killed ONE OF THE EUROPEANS. OH MY GOD...The UK would already be at war with Israel, and America would
be back peddling as usual trying to save face as their little brother commences to getting their butts kicked by the European Union. But, as it
were, Israel only killed a few "WORTHLESS" Muslims, so people like YOU can rest easy and place the blame back on the Western made Boogeyman of the
Islamic faith without having to lose a seconds worth of sleep.
So, let me get this straight... in this age, even self defense is viewed upon by the "hopelessly brainwashed" as aggression, and something as simple
as a pipe from aboard a ship can be considered a "viable" weapon against machine guns being wielded by highly trained COMMANDOS. Is that close? Am
I representing your opinion with accuracy here?
HAVE YOU LISTENED TO YOURSELF???
This is the reason why Ireland even sent an additional ship just to see what the Israelis would do. As a matter of fact, Israel had NO RIGHT to even
attack that ship because it had not yet entered THEIR territory. If you choose to remain blind, at least have your story straight.
There was not a single Israeli commando that lost their lives, but 9 Muslims did. So, where's the SPIN??? Maybe you're forgetting that there were
IMPARTIAL people who saw this atrocity which included WHITE Europeans and Westernized Media Professionals who were SICK to their stomachs because of
the Israeli aggression that they had to witness while sharing this boat with activists and Turks. There's no spin here except Israeli lack of
admittance to their psychosis.
Weapons...LOL. You mean like the WMD that we found in IRAQ??? It seems you're quick to believe anything that the media tells you...as long as it
fits with your predetermined view of reality.
Final example: Lets say someone were to come to your home with a 9 millimeter and start shooting while attempting to break into your house. They make
their way into your home, and somehow you're able to neutralize the assailant by smashing a lamp over his head because its the only thing at your
disposal. The next thing that you know, you're being arrested in your own home for defending yourself against this lunatic. Then the lunatic
decides to sue you because of your act of aggression against him. The next thing that you know, you're having to explain your side of the story to
the American public for nothing more than trying to protect you and your family. That's right. Now, you're the criminal. Now, you're the one
that is viewed as aggressive because someone claimed that you were simply adding your own, "SPIN" to the story. Believe it or not, this exact
scenario has happened before because people LIKE YOU have made it possible for a CRIMINAL to get away with MURDER because of the subjective way that
they CHOOSE to view the story, as opposed to looking at the HARD facts that surround the event. Those commandos didn't even get a splinter, while
people died and were injured on the other side of the coin.
I bet you're the type of person that claims that there are two sides of a story when a woman gets raped as well. "Spin," as you call it. Tell me,
when a woman gets raped...DOES SHE DESERVE IT??? Does she cease to be a pacifist, in your eyes, when she has the AUDACITY to defend herself against
the advances of a lunatic??? Was she asking for it???
Why don't you put that into perspective and come again when you've applied some critical thought to this situation.
Much love to all...
[edit on 5-6-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]