Originally posted by thedarklingthrush
It's the most reliable up to date information on the subject.
And all that means, in reality, is nothing. Secret programs do not post detailed status reports.
I also think its just a pretty good case that Russia can't domestically match the capabilities of what a 5th generation fighter should be. (I am
saying it should match the f-22)
It flew without new systems.
Thats your evidence? It didn't fly with them from the start, so Russia cannot do it? Pitifull really.
If you're gonna bash my information why don't you post some yourself all I see is you claiming I'm wrong with no proof. Why don't you tell me why
I'm wrong?
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm saying you are relying on unreliable sources of data and your own opinions, and I am saying that that is a
mistake. You have dismissed the PAK-FA out of hand on the basis of some very questionable information.
A rebuttal does not need evidence of the opposite, it just needs valid arguments as to why your position is faulty.
Take a look at where the F-22 program was when the first production prototype flew, and you will see that it is pretty much in the same position as
the PAK-FA is today - a position which you are claiming is evidence of incapability.