 |
|
Topic started on 9-6-2004 @ 07:47 PM by Catfish
|
I hear a lot of stuff from a lot of people, that you americans just accept whatever the media dishes out to you, without question. Or is it just some
of them??
But Id like the opinion of the actual populace, before I make conclusions.
im sure fellow ATS members can help me understand the US media more....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-6-2004 @ 07:57 PM by WaStEdDeAtH777
|
Well, you my friend are stereotyping a whole country based on a few people on a CONSPIRACY board. No one here (from what I know) is a brainwashed
maniac. Why else would they be here? Enlightenment is what I come here for, personally. I don't watch TV (less it be Spongebob Squarepants or
Family Guy) because it serves me no purpose other than to show me what the Newscasters want me to see. I am one of many, but I'm sure there's
people who follow blindly. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-6-2004 @ 07:58 PM by kaoscreator
|
Ah the media has a way of twisting stories to bring in more viewers. It's the dog eat dog way of the world. Make your story more exciting and get
more viewing, get more viewers, make more money.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 09:06 AM by Jonna
|
For many people in the US this does seem to be the case, but not for all. I do watch the televised news, but am the opposite as I automatically think
everything is a twisted truth or just a flat out lie. If I think that the information is relevant to me or important in some way, I find further
information through the different sources (usually international) or at ATS.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 09:59 AM by echosounder
|
You have pretty much answered your own question by posting it on a sight that guarantees a certain flavour of response.
Any mainstream media outlet is regulated by an agency of one type or another ie: FCC which just happens to be.....OH MY GOD a government agency.
Take for example an opinion poll, if a government wanted to run a poll asking a question about whether or not people thought the government was doing
a good job and have a positive spin on it, the best place to take that poll would be D.C. itself. Basically a much higher percentage of the people
they asked would work for the government and therefore would answer in the positive.
What I am trying to illustrate is that by asking the question here, as Wasteddeath pointed out, ON A CONSPIRACY site, you have set yourself up to get
a predetermined answer. Of course almost everyone here is going tell you that they never take anything the mainstream media feeds them at face value
because we all assume it has been filtered and watered down so much before we get the goods that it rarely resembles the truth. And the truth is what
we are all here trying to find.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 10:05 AM by TheBandit795
|
Yet, still I've seen the following argument way to often here on a consipracy site: "If that is true, then why haven't I seen it in the
evening news?" or "that would've major news by now, so it's not real/doesn't exist " etc...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 10:17 AM by theRiverGoddess
|
I HARDLY believe a thing I SEE on TV......sitcoms AND the news seam the SAME to me.
I have a background in film making.....and I KNOW first hand how to make THINGS look SO REAL! and its all very simple.....so easy to set up and get
others to BELIEVE whatever you want them to believe. They can even SEE it with theyre own eyes!......no I dont trust the NEWS process via the
television set.
So me? believe the news media? no way. Not on your life.
I stopped watching the news over 10 years ago, and I dont miss a thing.
I make a VERY big point of NOT watching espescially during ELECTION times.
Sadly....I have family members who believe every single thing they see on the news........they swallow it up hook line and sinker!
I like to listen to the radio for news.... PBS stations....and the like.
IF some station was to start up a "GOOD NEWS OF THE WORLD" and report on how the dog made toast for grandma would I watch......HAPPY HAPPY JOY
JOY!!! things ya know? then....and ONLY then, could they count me in as a 'watcher'..........
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 12:40 PM by el_topo
|
Originally posted by theRiverGoddess
IF some station was to start up a "GOOD NEWS OF THE WORLD" and report on how the dog made toast for grandma would I watch 
I'd watch that channel too! I'm always amazed at the way people automatically believe something they see in the news, in print, on TV or even on
the net. I would never believe something that a stranger off the street walked up a told me, so I'm not going to believe complete strangers who tell
me something through the TV either. People should realize that the media is a business, they are in the business to make money so they stay around,
and that money will always be their chief concern. Therefore you should understand everything they do is colored by that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 02:58 PM by echosounder
|
Originally posted by TheBandit795
Yet, still I've seen the following argument way to often here on a consipracy site: "If that is true, then why haven't I seen it in the
evening news?" or "that would've major news by now, so it's not real/doesn't exist " etc... 
Bang on Bandit I posted this comment on another thread.
The irony (if I'm using the word correctly) is that now more than ever we question the information we are fed by the White House's information
disemination centre known as CNN, we question any information given to us by the authorities but in the end we find any conspiracy theory hard to
accept until those same authorities admit that any given one is true.
And worse yet if they ever did come clean a whole new round of theories would evolve explaining that the admissions are disinformation to sheild us
from another even deeper darker secret.
[edit on 10-6-2004 by echosounder]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2004 @ 03:41 PM by websurfer
|
Yes, is there a reason not to. If it's on CNN then it has credibility, if its on www.drudgereport.com then I have doubts. It all depends what
channel its on. I have my doubts about the local media, because it was proposed that OJ Simpson was a mass serial rapist/murderer. I didn't
actually follow it closely at the time, because I was like 15 or 16 and had no interest in the news. It was amazing how quickly people jumped to
conclusions and labeled him a mass murderer. Then it occured to me, had he had not been a professional football (American form of rugby not to be
confused with the beautiful game), player there would be no interest. No one would have carred, because it happens all the time in the news. Hence
creating lost revenue for the media. OJ Simpson was more like a figure head that the media used to generate revenue.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2004 @ 02:54 AM by cloud
|
i only observe the news when i see fit...which is close to never, for i figured that all news is means nothing, except to further the political gains
of whoever is in control. it all goes to nothing in the end.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |